2021 Pre-Season Probability Poll Discussion Thread

[coit]

N Ill 0.9

Ken St 0.9

Clem 0.1

UNC 0.5

Pitt 0.5

Duke 0.9

UVA 0.5

VT 0.9

Miami 0.5

BC 0.5

ND 0.1

UGA 0.5

@coit my votes

Some serious strategic voting going on here. Or something.

 

[LegendaryGT]

Some serious strategic voting going on here. Or something.

I'm pretty awful at this kinda stuff.

 

[JoeCakeEater]

Kenn St - 0.9
Clem - 0.1
UNC - 0.3
Pitt - 0.6

 

[BrentwoodJacket]

Can you be more specific? I just spot checked and it looks right to me.

In the seasons predictions tab my entry has 0.3 in the Northern Illinois column. What does this represent?

 

[coit]

In the seasons predictions tab my entry has 0.3 in the Northern Illinois column. What does this represent?

I mentioned above that the Season Predictions tab has not been updated yet.

 

[BrentwoodJacket]

I mentioned above that the Season Predictions tab has not been updated yet.

OK. Thanks.

 

[coit]

The following folks are just missing 1 pick....

@00Burdell
@all4tech
@BainbridgeJacket
@BigCharlieStingEm90
@Bleedingyella
@crazyjacket
@FullMetalBuzz
@IslandJacket
@JJacket
@KrazieJacket
@MeatWrench
@pianoman

 

[MeatWrench]

Pitt - 0.5

 

[BainbridgeJacket]

The following folks are just missing 1 pick....

@00Burdell
@all4tech
@BainbridgeJacket
@BigCharlieStingEm90
@Bleedingyella
@crazyjacket
@FullMetalBuzz
@IslandJacket
@JJacket
@KrazieJacket
@MeatWrench
@pianoman

Pitt - 0.4

 

[00Burdell]

The following folks are just missing 1 pick....

@00Burdell

I checked the spreadsheet and apparently missed picking UNC. I dug up the thread but the poll closed Aug 15. Can you put me down for 0.2? Don't have a good vibe about this one.

 

[jacket67]

All picks must be submitted by 9 AM Saturday morning.

So people get to watch the UNC/VT game before they vote. Doesn't seem right.

 

[FullMetalBuzz]

@coit

uga 0.1

 

[Bleedingyella]

0.4 UNC

 

[KrazieJacket]

Beat duke .80

 

[JJacket]

Since we never were given the option to choose 1.0 the pole is fail. We have a 100% chance if beating KSU , not 90%

 

[GTWannaBee]

Since we never were given the option to choose 1.0 the pole is fail. We have a 100% chance if beating KSU , not 90%

I thought we had a 100% chance of beating Citadel until e we didn’t. I’d say 90% is correct.

 

[JJacket]

I thought we had a 100% chance of beating Citadel until e we didn’t. I’d say 90% is correct.

Still a fail. The probability of beating anyone, according to the moron who set up the pole, could never exceed .9 total, and that would be if everyone voted .9.
If you put the 1.0 in there, we might have ended up with a .91 chance of beating KSU. Pole fail

And there is a big difference in the team we are fielding now vs then.

 

[1982Jacket]

Since we never were given the option to choose 1.0 the pole is fail. We have a 100% chance if beating KSU , not 90%

By the same token, is the lack of an option to choose 0.0 also a fail? Which teams are you going to give the Jackets zero chance of beating?

 

[Techbert]

@coit can you check @cbee's picks?

Cuz I cannot believe that anyone would make the effort to answer the poll for every single game and still be that miserable of a cuss.

 

[JJacket]

By the same token, is the lack of an option to choose 0.0 also a fail? Which teams are you going to give the Jackets zero chance of beating?

GT never has a 0% chance of winning