A look at OC Chip Long’s Offense and why it works!

GTFLETCH said:
Chip Long is installing a run-first, up-tempo, pro-style offense! Long’s offensive philosophies center around the unit being in the QB's hands to make the right choice.

“One of my favorite runs is the G-Scheme; it gives us the opportunity to [take advantage of the defense overplaying Naked Playactions]… [This] is probably our most explosive run play for the last 10 years… defenses don’t see this anymore” – Chip Long

Things to Know about Chip Long:

1. “G-Scheme”, G-Scheme is an uncommon old school running play. The G-Scheme involves a “G-Block” which just refers to a trap of a defensive end/end-man-line-of-scrimmage by the play-side guard. Chip Long is reintroducing, or repackaging, depending on your point of view, a football play that is generally only living today in the Wing-T offense. The main difference between Old School G-scheme and Chip’s verision is that it is ran out of Pistol. Chip will sometimes attach one of his fast screens as a pre-snap check on the defense’s formation. It is a minor point that if he does attach a fast screen, the G-Scheme will be ran away from the screen, with the Adjuster being pre-snap read, as you kinda want your players actually blocking on the side of what is essentially a sweep play. Unlike the old school G-Scheme in the Wing-T Down play, the QB for the Jackets will just receive the snap and hand-off to the running back. The running back won’t do an option relationship, instead he will simply run at an aiming point outside of the Tight end. The Tight end is supposed to sell outside zone action, before releasing past the defensive end onto a linebacker. One variation that can be made is for the pulling guard to be given a “force call” which just means that he will not trap the DE, but instead destroy the player responsible for turning the offense away from the sideline.


This video is an example of a pistol G-Scheme run


This video is a nice example of an under center 2-TE formation


This video is from the Pistol with two TE lined up at the same side.



2. "Pin & Pull" , Coach Long will be using a gap/zone family offspring run called the Pin & Pull to threaten the edge. Pin & Pull is a “dynamic” run, in which virtually any linemen can be the puller or down-blocker depending on the defensive alignment. Pin & Pull is especially interesting because the linemen will be moving laterally which will allow more time to be given on RPO pass options before any technical football rules are violated. Basically the Frontside follows “zone rules” to determine blockers and pullers. That means that if you are covered you Down block, and if you are uncovered you pull. The Backside, similar to the G-scheme is sometimes blocked true zone, and sometimes follow frontside rules.

The first clip is Pin & Pull.


The second clip is a Pull read.


This is a Pin & Pull with the Frontside receiver setting up for a crack block

- YouTube

Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.
youtu.be youtu.be

This Pin & Pull lineup has a backside bubble screen attached

- YouTube

Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.
youtu.be youtu.be

3. "RPOs and The Option", Chip Long describes himself as ‘Pro-Style’ (if you look at the linemen’s stance there is no doubt), however he does run some “Triple Option” in his offense. Please remeber that a “throw” on a RPO is considered a “run” and If you are not a fan of bubbles for some reason, you are (somewhat) in luck. Coach Long greatly prefers to run fast screens instead of bubbles, back on topic: understanding RPOs with three reads. First level read – Read of a defensive linemen (or sometimes end-man-line-of-scrimmage) to determine whether to give/keep the ball. Second level RPO – Read of a backer to determine whether to throw the ball. Third level RPO – Read of a defensive back (safety, cornerback, etc) to determine whether to throw the ball. Double Option – A Chip Long term for a play in which only the ‘Adjuster’ is in conflict with a front side screen. The quarterback options are to Mesh Throw or to Hand Off. Triple Option – A Chip Long term for a play where a first level defender is put in conflict and also the adjuster. The quarterback’s options are to Hand Off, Mesh Run, and Mesh Throw.

3A. General RPOs: These routes are based on the coverage that they will expect to see at that down or distance that week. For man-aligned outside-leverage, double slants are the obvious choice. For quarters, Long said he wanted either a curl or go by the outside receiver and a 5 yard speed out by the inner receiver. It is generally understood that quarters is a matchup zone, with heavy run responsibilities for corners and safeties.

A Double Slants clip
https://youtu.be/z2uAvU5noHw

A single slant clip
https://youtu.be/sFtnrCsseY0

Out/Go clip the QB hits the out
https://youtu.be/mjOp65Rp0Uw

Out/Go clip the QB is able to hit the Go
https://youtu.be/rIMcKtkwb7s

Chip Long can also threaten the same areas as the Out/Go using an inline TE or an H-back by the Arrow/Go. These plays are particularly important as they both force and punish the defense for loading the box

The first clip is an arrow by the inline TE
https://youtu.be/Y4jjBOWlZBQ

The second clip is essentially an arrow from an H
https://youtu.be/kvnr7MYtyNI

3B. Double Option is where only the Adjuster is in conflict. The most common Double Option Coach Long uses is called a Fire 4.

The following clip is a perfect example of a Fire 4 call with a Turn To
https://youtu.be/_0gUtOTCjW8

3C. Triple Option: There are generally two forms of TO in RPO; 2nd level TO and 3rd level TO. The TO combines a read of a 1st-level-defender (defensive linemen) with a 2nd-level-defender (backer) or a 3rd-level-defender (defensive back). The more common by far is the 2nd-level because it is more reliable, but a third-level has greater big play potential.

the defensive end sits, causing the QB to hand off
https://youtu.be/buv8Ww238pw

the defensive end crashes, but the Adjuster stays with the screen which causes the QB run
https://youtu.be/ULzq6M1b5x8

A good example third-level triple option RPO
https://youtu.be/SV6aLZ9jYeE

4. "Playaction" Coach Long uses two different categories of playaction. The first is called “Naked” play action and it involves the QB running toward the perimeter without any protectors, often in the face of a defensive end. The second is what most think of “normal” playaction. Within standard playaction, Long used varying degrees of fakes , with some having the QB turn his back to the defenders and others just being a very light fake.


The first clip is an example of where the Flat route was thrown out of playaction
https://youtu.be/HxFp7DVAcXw

The second clip is an example of the Comeback route being thrown out of playaction
https://youtu.be/9kjFIQsKCYY



Taking shots down field coming from play-action, RPOs based off of game-planning what coverage they expect from their opponent from film, inside zone allowing running backs to hit the A backside to the B backside, an emphasis on a short passing game, tight ends in motion and an offensive line showcasing pulling guards, pin and pull and G-scheme are all examples of offensive philosophies and ideas that Long will bring to the FLATS. Tight ends are in motion a lot because defenses try to key on them for the run, but he uses them a lot for deception, as well. The alley defender determines a lot of the offense, as every play has more than one option. Whether that is the SAM, nickel corner or tight safety. A short passing game is to encourage the tempo of the offense. Condensed routes allow for receivers to get lined up fast whether they get the ball or not, and it also keeps defenses on their heels for double moves. He would run power every play if he has the line to do it — he loves physical football. Go Jackets!
Click to expand...

Chris Weinke understands offense too. I’d be happy with Chip Long or Weinke as HC. But if Collins is fired it’s unlikely any of the current staff will be retained.
 
Tampa Jacket said:
Chris Weinke understands offense too. I’d be happy with Chip Long or Weinke as HC. But if Collins is fired it’s unlikely any of the current staff will be retained.
Click to expand...
When Bill Lewis was fired, George Oleary was on staff. So hopefully the AD has a plan.
 
In 2021 Georgia Tech finished 92nd out of 130 FBS team in average yards (367.3) and 96th in points (23.8). On average, Chip Long’s offenses threw the ball about 5% more often than before he arrived. For referenced, GT’s rush rate was 51% in 2021, so look for something closer to 45% next season. We play Clemson first in 2022. In 2021 Tulane faced Oklahoma during week 1 and lost 40-35. Tulane was aggressive in that game and had some really good concepts and a few interesting spins on some concepts lots of teams are running. Watch below if you want to see what Georgia Tech's offense could look like in 2022.

 
GTFLETCH said:
In 2021 Georgia Tech finished 92nd out of 130 FBS team in average yards (367.3) and 96th in points (23.8). On average, Chip Long’s offenses threw the ball about 5% more often than before he arrived. For referenced, GT’s rush rate was 51% in 2021, so look for something closer to 45% next season. We play Clemson first in 2022. In 2021 Tulane faced Oklahoma during week 1 and lost 40-35. Tulane was aggressive in that game and had some really good concepts and a few interesting spins on some concepts lots of teams are running. Watch below if you want to see what Georgia Tech's offense could look like in 2022.

Click to expand...

You seem bipolar. Seek medical help.
 
GTFLETCH said:
In 2021 Georgia Tech finished 92nd out of 130 FBS team in average yards (367.3) and 96th in points (23.8). On average, Chip Long’s offenses threw the ball about 5% more often than before he arrived. For referenced, GT’s rush rate was 51% in 2021, so look for something closer to 45% next season. We play Clemson first in 2022. In 2021 Tulane faced Oklahoma during week 1 and lost 40-35. Tulane was aggressive in that game and had some really good concepts and a few interesting spins on some concepts lots of teams are running. Watch below if you want to see what Georgia Tech's offense could look like in 2022.

Click to expand...


I watched most of the OU-Tulane game last year and recall being impressed with their offensive game plan. They were aggressive and found a lot of holes in the defense. Granted, I don’t think OU has played decent defense in a decade.
 
GTFLETCH said:
In 2021 Georgia Tech finished 92nd out of 130 FBS team in average yards (367.3) and 96th in points (23.8). On average, Chip Long’s offenses threw the ball about 5% more often than before he arrived. For referenced, GT’s rush rate was 51% in 2021, so look for something closer to 45% next season. We play Clemson first in 2022. In 2021 Tulane faced Oklahoma during week 1 and lost 40-35. Tulane was aggressive in that game and had some really good concepts and a few interesting spins on some concepts lots of teams are running. Watch below if you want to see what Georgia Tech's offense could look like in 2022.

Click to expand...

That was excellent.
 
Diseqc said:
You seem bipolar. Seek medical help.
Click to expand...
Oh look. On this page in this thread we have someone is a GT FANatic being a fanatic and someone who is a douche being a douche.
 
Last edited:
daBuzz said:
Oh look. On this page in this thread we have someone is a GT FANatic being a fanatic and someone who is a douche being a douche.
Click to expand...
You mean the same guy being a fanatic in this thread yet starting 10 other “Collins sucks” threads. Once again you’re a retard.
 
Diseqc said:
You mean the same guy being a fanatic in this thread yet starting 10 other “Collins sucks” threads. Once again you’re a retard.
Click to expand...
Ahh so because he doesn't like Collins, he's supposed to bitch about it in every thread and not be excited about anything else?
I'm well aware of his postings about Collins. But that doesn't mean the guy can't be excited about the potential for Long's offense.
 
GTFLETCH said:
In 2021 Georgia Tech finished 92nd out of 130 FBS team in average yards (367.3) and 96th in points (23.8). On average, Chip Long’s offenses threw the ball about 5% more often than before he arrived. For referenced, GT’s rush rate was 51% in 2021, so look for something closer to 45% next season. We play Clemson first in 2022. In 2021 Tulane faced Oklahoma during week 1 and lost 40-35. Tulane was aggressive in that game and had some really good concepts and a few interesting spins on some concepts lots of teams are running. Watch below if you want to see what Georgia Tech's offense could look like in 2022.

Click to expand...


Looks familiar

Mesh
giphy.gif


giphy.gif

giphy.gif

giphy.gif


Snag
giphy.gif

Will we execute better is the question?
 
GTFLETCH said:
In 2021 Georgia Tech finished 92nd out of 130 FBS team in average yards (367.3) and 96th in points (23.8).
Click to expand...
Ok, where was Tulane?
73rd and 74th
On average, Chip Long’s offenses threw the ball about 5% more often than before he arrived. For referenced, GT’s rush rate was 51% in 2021, so look for something closer to 45% next season.
Click to expand...
No, wrong

GT- 786 offensive plays, 444 rushes, 56.5%, 57th ranked rushing offense
Tulane- 823 offensive plays, 447 rushes, 54.3%, 60th

We play Clemson first in 2022. In 2021 Tulane faced Oklahoma during week 1 and lost 40-35. Tulane was aggressive in that game and had some really good concepts and a few interesting spins on some concepts lots of teams are running. Watch below if you want to see what Georgia Tech's offense could look like in 2022.

Click to expand...


As IBB points out, we've done a lot of this same exact stuff. Ability to execute and TE utilization are going to be the only distinguishing factors. There's also the rest of the 2021 Tulane season to look at and it's much less impressive.

If you want to do some data analytics, show us TE utilization (catches, targets, plays in 12 personnel, etc) at Memphis, ND, and Tulane during Long’s tenures as well as us with Pnode and compare against offensive production. I would expect THAT to draw a meaningful distinction between what we see and to explain the relative successes from Long and lack of at Tulane. Then we should ask ourselves if we're in a more similar position to Tulane or ND when it comes to the TE room.
 
Also, if you want to know why I get so put off by pointless stat chasing, look at Michigan State from last year.
Record: 11-2
Final Rank: 9
Offense: 42nd total, 38th scoring, 47th passing, 53rd rushing
Defense: 111th total, 54th scoring, 130th passing (dead last, we were 121st), 15th rushing

BTW, we traded our DL coach for their DB coach. #winning
 
BainbridgeJacket said:
Ok, where was Tulane?
73rd and 74th

No, wrong

GT- 786 offensive plays, 444 rushes, 56.5%, 57th ranked rushing offense
Tulane- 823 offensive plays, 447 rushes, 54.3%, 60th




From what I understand Tulane had a fraction of the practice time as everyone else due to a hurricane
Click to expand...
 
ibeeballin said:
Looks familiar

Mesh
giphy.gif


giphy.gif

giphy.gif

giphy.gif


Snag
giphy.gif

Will we execute better is the question?
Click to expand...
What is interesting is you are taking plays from multiple games to compare to an entire gameplay from one game. When you look at a GT game, say Pitt and compare the scheme and play calling to say a Chip Long games (Tulane vs Oklahoma) you can clearly see the difference.
 
BainbridgeJacket said:
As IBB points out, we've done a lot of this same exact stuff.
Click to expand...

Yes IBB has taken a few plays from multiple games to say that what CDP called and schemes was/is the same as Chip Longs offense.

I have posted offense Highlights from the GT/Pitt game and the Tulane/Oklahoma game. Go ahead and cut up both of those highlights and point out the same plays. If you watch those my money is on that folks can see that Chip Longs scheme and play calling is different then CDP.
 
Last edited:
BainbridgeJacket said:
Ok, where was Tulane?
73rd and 74th
Click to expand...


2021 (3-9) Georgia Tech Total Offense ranking: #92 -Games: 12 -Plays 786 -Total yards 4408 - yds per play 5.61 - TD 33 - Yds Per game- 367.3

2021 (2-10) Tulane Total Offense ranking: #73 -Games: 12 -Plays 823 -Total yards 4638 - yds per play 5.64 - TD 42 - Yds Per game- 386.5


 
GTFLETCH said:
What is interesting is you are taking plays from multiple games to compare to an entire gameplay from one game. When you look at a GT game, say Pitt and compare the scheme and play calling to say a Chip Long games (Tulane vs Oklahoma) you can clearly see the difference.
Click to expand...

Contrary to popular belief, our coaches actually schemed and devised plans on the opponent . Mesh was one of base passing concepts under CDP. You take what the defense gives you. Why would we run mesh constantly vs. when their defensive game plan doesn’t suggest that would be good concept?

But since you asked for Pitt. When we did run mesh and this was the result
giphy.gif
 
ibeeballin said:
Contrary to popular belief, our coaches actually schemed and devised plans on the opponent . Mesh was one of base passing concepts under CDP. You take what the defense gives you. Why would we run mesh constantly vs. when their defensive game plan doesn’t suggest that would be good concept?

But since you asked for Pitt. When we did run mesh and this was the result
giphy.gif
Click to expand...
Thank goodness we have a new OC! I still think you should rewatch the GT/Pitt game and then the Tulane/Okla games and you will understand that while Chip Long's offense runs some similar concepts to the spread that Patenaude used, it has more motion, more tight ends and more under the center concepts in short-yardage and the red zone as well as more power running play concepts that all play into the Jackets' current personnel. IMHO!
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top