BarrelORum
Mediocre Poster
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2002
- Messages
- 16,274
A. You're an idiot
B. A squared
Dude, you've been on a roll the last 24 hours giving people öööö... I kinda like it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A. You're an idiot
B. A squared
Unc absolutely deserves to be in if they win. No one is really debating this though, right?
People are saying a 2-loss Stanford team that wins the Pac XII would jump them.
If UNC wins and all others hold serve I think the playoff looks like this:
#1) Bama
#2) Iowa
#3) OU
#4) Stanford
#5) UNC
#6) MSU
#7) Ohio State
#8) Clemson
I'm not saying I agree with it. I think UNC is a really good team, which is really ironic (am I using this right?) given the pre-season picks, etc.
Gonna be a lot of holding calls and personal fouls on UNC this weekend if the ACC office is thinking the same
That is an excellent point. Clearly a system where the conference would be biased toward one team over another is a flawed system.
Like accidentally giving one team a 5th down?
Maybe I'm remembering incorrectly but I don't recall the ACC officials really screwing us over last year and they'd have had similar motivations to do so with regard to getting a team in the playoff.
The tin foil is thick with this one.
They didn't really have to. Unfortunately FSU played their only perfect game of the season against us. Turnover-wise, at least.
Gonna be a lot of holding calls and personal fouls on UNC this weekend if the ACC office is thinking the same
Next year will be a 3-0 final score game between a 7-5 Syracuse vs 8-4 Pitt in front of 1,200 people in a rainstorm of biblical proportions.
We are the ACC. We aren't allowed to have nice things.