AlabamaBuzz
Dodd-Like
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2009
- Messages
- 3,163
Yes, and these true freshman did one heck of a job slowing down Bammer's NFL receivers.....with that said, I am hoping they make youth mistakes against our option plays.....Go Jackets!!
They're likely benefiting from good DL pressure.
That actually worries me more. If they are starting as true freshmen in a program like VT, that means that they are exceptional talents.
I think they'd continue to do that if we dropped back to pass 15-20 times.
Of course they will. GT's pass protection isn't built like Alabama's OL.
I think the simple fact that we will have the year of experience we didn't have (sans the receiver position for the most part) in last year's game will pay dividends moving the ball outside this season.
We forget that we were essentially breaking in all new receivers and A-backs in the VPI game last year, and Orwin Smith left the game early in the second half.
Something people forget about our pass blocking is our OL splits for the option. That leaves wide lanes for a blitzing backer or agile DL to knife through.
VT usually backs off their corners a bit. Like against UNC, the comeback should be there most of the night.
Oregon's OL splits are wider than ours from what I've seen and they seem to do fine with pass protection.
I don't think they are any wider than us.
Oregon also runs a lot of screens and short drops to neutralize the defense pinning their ears back. We are usually taking shots deep which requires more time. Their OL is also better than ours. They are the best offense in the country, so comparing our pass pro to theirs is a pretty high standard of expectation.
Something people forget about our pass blocking is our OL splits for the option. That leaves wide lanes for a blitzing backer or agile DL to knife through.
If you ask CPJ about it, he'll say "We'll take what the defense gives us".