savbandjacket
Dr. SBJ
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2006
- Messages
- 30,196
Apparently Dodd is also the father of the defeatist attitude that too many of our fans have.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Apparently Dodd is also the father of the defeatist attitude that too many of our fans have.
Dodd's Luck said:About the middle of the season (1966), Dodd knew he was going to quit. "I just could not compete with those damn state universities", he said. . . . "They could take these same boys that we couldn't take, who wanted to come and play for me. And it just broke me down.
"I couldn't beat 'em. You can just outcoach 'em some of the time, even when they have better players. But you can't outcoach 'em all of the time, brother. Better football players will beat you."
I reallyhateddisliked Curry for his comments when he left (and taking credit for some of the players on the 1990 team during an in-game interview during The Sting), I only warmed back up to him after reading Dodd's book where Dodd explained (in Braine like fashion) why Curry should have taken the job.
It will always be Grant Field to me.
Also, öööö E$PN for not mentioning that the 1928 and 1952 teams are considered MNCs as well.
With the advent of football factories all around him, and the incoming integration
The next paragraph from what I quoted from Dodd's book a few post above:Can I get some education on the above. Admittedly I'm, not too familiar with Dodd's attitude towards integration and its impact on GT.
Are you suggesting that once other schools decided to integrate, Dodd realized the good times were up? Or he was decidedly against integration?
Dodd's Luck said:The impending racial integration of southern universities and southern football also figured into his decision. Initially, that would only further hamper the football program at Tech. Many of the black players who would have become available to previously segregated southern football schools had had separate, but hardly equal, educations. Thus, many of them would not be prepared academically for Tech, either for admittance or for doing the schoolwork. So Tech would be at a further recruiting disadvantage.
It had absolutely NOTHING to do with his attitude about anything. In fact, Dodd never had any problem playing against integrated teams when others did. He simply knew that the bigger state universities would throw the calculus books at those kids with even more fervor.Can I get some education on the above. Admittedly I'm, not too familiar with Dodd's attitude towards integration and its impact on GT.
Are you suggesting that once other schools decided to integrate, Dodd realized the good times were up? Or he was decidedly against integration?
If Dodd’s attitude about Tech was such that he encouraged our coaches (who were also alums) to take jobs elsewhere so they could be “big time,” I see absolutely no reason why his name should be on our stadium. He should get the same recognition as Alexander - a courtyard.
I must have missed where Curry went to ND.He was encouraging a friend to take the most distinguished and revered job in the profession. Dodd is by far the best thing ever to happen to Georgia Tech football. To name the stadium after him was the least we could do.
I must have missed where Curry went to ND.
I would give this a hundred likes if I could. Only an idiot would trash the greatest thing Tech ever hadHe was encouraging a friend to take the most distinguished and revered job in the profession. Dodd is by far the best thing ever to happen to Georgia Tech football. To name the stadium after him was the least we could do.
Dodd was a man of enormous ego. It was a trait that made him an all-American quarterback, and a great coach. There is an undeniable component of making Bud Carson his successor to preserve his legacy. Just like Vince Dooley being followed by Ray Goff.If Dodd’s attitude about Tech was such that he encouraged our coaches (who were also alums) to take jobs elsewhere so they could be “big time,” I see absolutely no reason why his name should be on our stadium. He should get the same recognition as Alexander - a courtyard.
Dodd was the best thing ever to happen to Georgia Tech football, and a case could be made that he was the best thing ever to happen to Georgia Tech, period. He was a factor in the perfect storm of Atlanta's rise as a city, a communication and technology hub of an entire region. His excellence in sports tapped a burgeoning market that, for the first time since reconstruction, could beat its chest as a bona fide winner. His relentless PR extolling the academic prowess of his players, while indeed self-serving, it spread the reputation of the Institute throughout the entire country. For a decade or more, Georgia Tech was the place to be, the place to go, and was establishing itself as a partner in the industrial Renaissance of the New South. Even our rivals had to acknowledge: "those brainiacs can play football."He was encouraging a friend to take the most distinguished and revered job in the profession. Dodd is by far the best thing ever to happen to Georgia Tech football. To name the stadium after him was the least we could do.
Well said. For the brainiacs on here that think his name should be taken off the stadium, I offer two things:Dodd was the best thing ever to happen to Georgia Tech football, and a case could be made that he was the best thing ever to happen to Georgia Tech, period. He was a factor in the perfect storm of Atlanta's rise as a city, a communication and technology hub of an entire region. His excellence in sports tapped a burgeoning market that, for the first time since reconstruction, could beat its chest as a bona fide winner. His relentless PR extolling the academic prowess of his players, while indeed self-serving, it spread the reputation of the Institute throughout the entire country. For a decade or more, Georgia Tech was the place to be, the place to go, and was establishing itself as a partner in the industrial Renaissance of the New South. Even our rivals had to acknowledge: "those brainiacs can play football."
Can I get some education on the above. Admittedly I'm, not too familiar with Dodd's attitude towards integration and its impact on GT.
Are you suggesting that once other schools decided to integrate, Dodd realized the good times were up? Or he was decidedly against integration?
I like it.From the time I've spent reading ST I know there are a lot of guys who have actual real memories of Dodd, but what if his name was stripped off the stadium and replaced with Coca-Cola or something else to bring in advertising dollars to help the program. "X" Stadium at Historic Grant Field. He has a statue. He has a coaching award with is name. Lots of other Dodd stuff. Let the GTAA make some marketing money and fuel the program back to perennial power. Might take some heat initially, but if the money is well spent a few extra wins will make it all forgotten. That how it works, right? Winning cures everything!
Even Savannah was more important throughout much of history. Sherman burned Atlanta for good measure, but Savannah was the prize and Lincoln's Christmas gift.