Alabama has won 6 of the last 12 national championships. Clemson has positioned itself right there with Alabama. The top 10 recruiting schools haven’t change in 10 years. This isn’t going to widen the gap because the gap is already ridiculous.That’s wrong in my opinion too.
if any of you think that this kind of stuff is good for Georgia Tech athletics I respectfully disagree. This will only further widen the gap between the haves and the have-nots. The gap between the University of Georgia, Clemson and Georgia Tech football just got even wider.
instead of getting a win against one of those programs every 4-5 years it will be once or twice in a lifetime.
That’s wrong in my opinion too.
if any of you think that this kind of stuff is good for Georgia Tech athletics I respectfully disagree. This will only further widen the gap between the haves and the have-nots. The gap between the University of Georgia, Clemson and Georgia Tech football just got even wider.
instead of getting a win against one of those programs every 4-5 years it will be once or twice in a lifetime.
Alabama has won 6 of the last 12 national championships. Clemson has positioned itself right there with Alabama. The top 10 recruiting schools haven’t change in 10 years. This isn’t going to widen the gap because the gap is already ridiculous.
Alternatively, institutions like Tech can compete for those players by promising them a base amount of money that should satisfy most of their needs and wants, and make up for the 3-4 years of money differentials they may earn from an Alabama, through the value of a Tech degree which would earn them far more in the decades of productive working years post even the longest NFL career they could possibly have.Yea, it’s bad for Tech. Those paying players can now do it legally. The bagmen will be more brazen and the money being thrown around by the factories will be more obvious.
Alternatively, institutions like Tech can compete for those players by promising them a base amount of money that should satisfy most of their needs and wants, and make up for the 3-4 years of money differentials they may earn from an Alabama, through the value of a Tech degree which would earn them far more in the decades of productive working years post even the longest NFL career they could possibly have.
I think you know the answer to that.If there is no limit, can a booster just give the money to a sports agent and go ahead and have the kid under contract and say he is used to advertise the sports agent's business?
Im with you. I want to still care but I find I just really don’t anymore. Every day I get closer to walking away from college football and not looking back.
Wrong forum?When you precede your business proposition in a public posting with "this is basically a way to make paying players tax deductible", I just think "time to see a lawyer".
I've got one piece of Onward Reserve gear:Onward Reserve is a men's apparel brand launched by Georgia graduate TJ Callaway, popular in SEC and Southern circles. Kirby Smart, Trevor Lawrence and Jake Fromm have all been spotted in Onward Reserve gear, and so Callaway is leveraging the new rules to market to dudes of a certain demographic.
Certain demographics? What could go wrong lol
Anything that shakes up the s***show we have now is a good thing. The dark money is what's killing CFB. Let players get paid in the light of day, and the bagmen have to ramp up their game to keep the players flowing, hopefully unsustainably so.
Not being snarky but when was college football ever "pure"? Was it better for you when you just assumed those Bama or UGA players were getting paid but didn't know for sure? Did you ever think a majority of football players were real students? Now the CFP era seems to have changed things for the worse, unexpectedly, so if that's what you're belly aching about then I agree. The old saying be careful what you wish for has come true and now college football is scrambling to fix the mess.Every day I get closer to walking away from college football and not looking back.