BOWLS

[77GTFan]

He was certainly a defenseless player with that big hit. The guy did get him with a shoulder. He also went helmet to helmet.

 

[JoeCakeEater]

Lol, what?? How the hell do you reverse that?

 

[cymdiggity]

I can handle a ref missing the call in real-time much better than a review where I see something that would be targeting 9 out of 10 times reversed. That erodes confidence in the game.

I kinda feel the opposite -- I wish they could review every call so we can end the BS. I think they did make the right call there in the end, but I know in my heart GT would've been hosed in that situation lol. Why is targetting reviewable but not DPI or facemasks for instance

 

[jts1207]

Horse fn öööö

 

[ElCidBUZZingFAN]

Isn’t the rule it is supposed to be where the ball crosses the out of bounds line? If so, easy call short. It is just never spotted that way

They used that new line öööö. They have the same öööö you and I see.


CFB is crap. Haha.

 

[GTCrew4b]

I kinda feel the opposite -- I wish they could review every call so we can end the BS. I think they did make the right call there in the end, but I know in my heart GT would've been hosed in that situation lol. Why is targetting reviewable but not DPI or facemasks for instance

Probably because of the impact of the ejection.

 

[andrew]

I go back to my comment in the earlier game. Call targeting in real time. Mark the penalty. No review. For those who believe review is always about getting it right, you are naive. Review gives officials’ bias opportunity to affect outcomes. I don’t believe many officials blatantly cheat. But they do have biases. Coach Steve Logan said it well, “Believe me, the officials know who is supposed to win.” I can handle a ref missing the call in real-time much better than a review where I see something that would be targeting 9 out of 10 times reversed. That erodes confidence in the game.

But they got it right in this case thanks to review.

 

[jts1207]

Now all the sudden they got 40 fn camera angles

 

[77GTFan]

To hell with replay. Cheating beyond belief.

 

[Supersize that order mutt]

At least they called the dropped backwards pass right

 

[aeromech]

What are the odds we ever see that 'spot the ball' technology again?

 

[GTCrew4b]

But they got it right in this case thanks to review.

Was he not hit in the head or neck area? Is that not part of the rule anymore?

 

[ScionOfSouthland]

What are the odds we ever see that 'spot the ball' technology again?

First time I ever saw it!

 

[coit]

What are the odds we ever see that 'spot the ball' technology again?

What’s funny to me is that if that was at the goal line it would not be a touchdown because the ball would cross the goal line outside the pylon. But in this case, crossing the line to gain “outside the pylon” is OK.

Stupid as hell.

 

[aeromech]

Was he not hit in the head or neck area? Is that not part of the rule anymore?

Maybe the concussion was due to simulated pressure?

 

[gtfan088]

Ohio State needs to go ahead and put them away this drive. No safe 'ball control' nonsense.

 

[GoJackets89]

What are the odds we ever see that 'spot the ball' technology again?

Yeah, I've never seen that bullshit.

 

[The Jacket]

mm chikim

 

[GTBandit22]

Was he not hit in the head or neck area? Is that not part of the rule anymore?

We have had it called on us for launching at a defenseless player. Yet another judgement call for them to choose which way it impacts the game

 

[The Jacket]

Dumbass doesn't need a face anyway.