Longestdays
Flats Noob
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2011
- Messages
- 742
You have to intentionally engage high and low. This was not intentional as it is obvious who each person is intending to engage. This might have been hard to see live....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes. It is. A player went low while another blocked high. He whiffed his assignment.That LB was coming right at the mesh and must be cut off. 62 must cut off 25. This is not a chop block.
Yes. It is. A player went low while another blocked high. He whiffed his assignment.
Late hits on the sidelines generally aren't intentional either. Nor are false starts. Perhaps we could start explaining to the refs when we intentionally want to be penalized.Is intentionality a part of the rule? What's the literal rule?
And he chop blocked the VT player with our center. Are you blind?wrong...
62 impeded 25 from killing the mesh and did his job.
And he chop blocked the VT player with our center. Are you blind?
I just wish he had played at this level for 4 yearsGoing to miss Shamire. You could see the fear in #54
Tell me why it isn't a chop. The LB had no effect on the direction of the left tackle. He dove straight ahead into the knees of a player being blocked high, you arrogant know it all prick. It is an obvious chop. Give me your ööööing reason why it isn't.I am not but you don't know the rules.
So any incidental contact below the waist is a chop block if someone else is blocking... not true.