Dawg Dismay

refrigeratormover said:
I asked Geetee to answer my question and he won't.

Knox, Tell us what you would do right at this minute if you were Drad?
Call up Dave Braine and tell him what a sumbitch he was for leaving me with this situation. Tell Gailey if he doesn't beat Georgia this year he should just hop into his car after the final whistle and drive far, far away.
 
knoxjacket said:
Tell Gailey if he doesn't beat Georgia this year he should just hop into his car after the final whistle and drive far, far away.

Thank you! This will be discussed at length when they meet shortly.

I think Drad has received enough emails from all of us that he understands this.

Now, I think you would agree we should move on and get ready for a good recruiting class and get these kids having a great offseason and ready for spring. Life's too short to keep bringing up the past.
 
RickyReck said:
I have been a GT fan for 65 years through thick and thin and facts are facts, your problem is you have given up and I will not. I believe GT's future is bright but I do not believe in quick fixes and when I believe CCG has been given enough time without the baggage he inherited then I'll say so but in the mean time I will not go on these public boards and insult the Insitute by calling The HC, no matter who it is, SA's, the AD or any other GT offical names, something that you seem to have a knack for.
Knox if you can't refute the facts why don't you just keep your mouth shut .
If you think running down the GT HC the way you go about it makes you a winner you're
LIVING IN FANTASY LAND

Funny thing knox when you don't have an answer you go to name calling. Facts are Facts.
Fans have never gotten GT in or out of predictments.
I'll bet you're a real tough guy too.
__________________


You quickly arealize that if you're not a "yes" CCG is the greatest man, you quickly get called out by the masses on this board....You hit the nail on the head in an earlier post...
 
RickyReck said:
Again you make my point you insult and name call rather than point out what I said that is not a matter of record or the truth.
I want GT to be the very best it can but I don't want demands put on any coach at GT that are not at least realistic nor do I want any coach replaced untill he's been given a chance to be successful without his hands bieng tied the last I checked there wasn't a long list of coaches jumping at the chance to become our head coach.

knox, how may I ask is that bad mouthing GT?
 
RickyReck said:
knox, how may I ask is that bad mouthing GT?
I don't want demands put on any coach at GT that are not at least realistic

You're saying it's unrealistic to expect Georgia Tech to beat Georgia or win the ACC. If that's not a slap in the face I don't know what is.

Tear down the program to build up the man.
 
Buzz, you could turn that question on its head and ask why Richt had to start a freshman when he had a senior with game experience on the team. In other words, why didn't Richt develop Terenshinski and Cox to at least be better than a true freshmen?
Florida: Remember that Richt was QB-rich with Greene and Shockley for a number of years. Therefore, it does not suprise me that Tereshinski (or any 3rd/4th stringer) didn't get much development or play time. This past season was the first time in probably 5 seasons that Richt was forced to really develop anyone beyond his primary starters of Greene and Shockley. After several mistakes (Cox) and/or injuries (Tereshinski) along the way this season, Stafford simply appears to be the more reliable and stable QB of the three. Call it fate or innate ability on the part of Stafford, but the Freshman won out in the end. I expect that Richt will develop him into a fairly complete package over the next few years while still maintaining a decent arsenal of backup QBs in case they are needed. UGA may be watching another Greene-in-the-making with Stafford.

Also, Cox is not too shabby. If I remember correctly, he came in to pull out a win for the second game that Stafford started when Richt pulled him for nonperformance. Notice the difference in philosophies between GT and UGA. Richt does not seem to hesitate to pull a nonperforming starter, if necessary.
 
Buzz Bomb said:
Florida: Remember that Richt was QB-rich with Greene and Shockley for a number of years. Therefore, it does not suprise me that Tereshinski (or any 3rd/4th stringer) didn't get much development or play time. This past season was the first time in probably 5 seasons that Richt was forced to really develop anyone beyond his primary starters of Greene and Shockley. After several mistakes (Cox) and/or injuries (Tereshinski) along the way this season, Stafford simply appears to be the more reliable and stable QB of the three. Call it fate or innate ability on the part of Stafford, but the Freshman won out in the end. I expect that Richt will develop him into a fairly complete package over the next few years while still maintaining a decent arsenal of backup QBs in case they are needed. UGA may be watching another Greene-in-the-making with Stafford.

Also, Cox is not too shabby. If I remember correctly, he came in to pull out a win for the second game that Stafford started when Richt pulled him for nonperformance. Notice the difference in philosophies between GT and UGA. Richt does not seem to hesitate to pull a nonperforming starter, if necessary.

My general point was that I think you're giving Richt too much credit and Gailey too much blame. This past year, Richt had one five star true freshman, a four star RS freshman and a four star (RS?) senior. Gailey had Reggie, who may not have gotten a single other offer to play QB, and Taylor, a QB who played only one year in HS and whose only other significant offer was from Boise State.

Now, there's definitely a discussion to be had about Chan's recruiting up until this year. I've never been one of those guys that thought recruiting rankings were worthless. So, if we were to compare Richt and Gailey in that department, Richt has definitely done better, academic restrictions or not.

However, the comparison between Richt and Gailey's QB development skills is much less certain. Up until the Georiga-Auburn game, Georgia was suffering greatly from poor QB play. The game before Auburn, a loss to Kentucky where Stafford threw three interception, is the quintessential example of ugag's troubles in the middle of the season. And these QB problems happened with Terenshinski, Cox and Stafford on the roster.

I won't defend GT's QB play, nor Chan's decision to stay with Reggie. But I will note GT's far inferior recruting success at the QB postion. Who knows whether Richt would have done a better job with Reggie and Taylor or whether Gailey would have done a better job with Terenshinski, Cox and Stafford.
 
My general point was that I think you're giving Richt too much credit and Gailey too much blame.
Florida: I'm definitely not a UGA supporter but I do respect and give Richt credit where credit is due. Since Chan has never beaten Richt as GT HC, I have to infer that Richt is definitely doing something right and deserves some level of credit for his achievements.

You and I both know that the recruiting argument could be carried to extremes when discussing UGA. Some of the players they manage to keep academically eligible would never stand even the slightest, remote chance of ever getting into Tech.
 
knoxjacket said:
You're saying it's unrealistic to expect Georgia Tech to beat Georgia or win the ACC.
.

You're spinning again knox.
I never said that, those are your words.
you are either spinning or name calling on every post.
 
Actually that is exactly what you said. You were sputtering off your usual foolish nonsense about UGA, good coaching, and us not being able to beat them.

You must be a real joy to be around with your defeatist attitude.
 
Spinning again knox thats not what I said and you know it.
What I posted was the truth and backed up with records not SPUTTERINGS.
You're like those on bo, you EDIT certain words out of a post to make it sound the way you want it to
 
RickyReck said:
Spinning again knox thats not what I said and you know it.
What I posted was the truth and backed up with records not SPUTTERINGS.
You're like those on bo, you EDIT certain words out of a post to make it sound the way you want it to
Umm, it's not the truth. We lost to Furman once. That doesn't mean we can't beat them. Perhaps in your old age you've lost track of time, but what happened in the 1960s has no bearing on today.

If Kentucky and Vanderbilt can beat Georgia, we should be able to.
 
I haven't spun anything, but I'm through with this. It's like talking to a brick wall.
 
Knox I love GT and I'm sure you do also but I will never allow you or anyone else to use what I have posted out of context. When you remove a few words you change the intire meaning of the post that is what you did and you know it.
 
Back
Top