What a Thread !!! How did we get from the original "Duke" issue to the coaching issue again... anyway... I think its great to have all of the different opinions that we do... and from what I have read, all have merit... I agree with Beeware, to an extent, I too do not think that the coaching change was handled correctly by Braine... I was disappointed, but that is only based on what I know... I do think Braine made the right hire, not because CG is God, but because I think he was the better candidate for the job... O'Leary did leave alot of talent.. but we also had alot of talent last year, even the experts thought so, but we learned that it was possible to lose with exceptional talent... I have also learned that coaching is more of a key than most want to realize (Lou Holtz has had two straight 8+ win seasons, something SC didnt do but 4 times since 1892)... to me, the bottom line is that I dont have to like the way Braine handled things, but I give my full support to the new staff, and I do think that a few years from now we will be glad to have had Gailey...
Now, as far as the original post ... I think the Duke and losing perception all boils down to expectations.. if you expect to win, you will find a way to win.. .if you expect and accept losing, then you probably will.... GT accepted losing after the Dodd years... and wanted to blame it on everything from academics, coaches, to lack of facilities, whatever... but the bottom line is, I dont think anyone really cared about winning.. I do believe that if winning were expected... the administration, fanbase, alumni, etc. would have done something to stop the bleeding... In my own opinion, from 1967 until the time that Homer Rice came on campus.. we had a poor showing in terms of our AD... the job just wasnt done, and as a result, most accepted losing.