Well, the "I heard" is really a table setter for an opinion. Who said it? But even if somebody said it, what is said is they wouldn't "play him". No mention of yanking a scholarship. This is done all the time everywhere and is completely ethical. A guy can stay, get his degree, and be cannon fodder. But he's not good enough to play. (One could extrapolate the argument to say it in fact can help a player who honestly feels he can play. He has notice and can go elsewhere to prove it.) I assume GT does as all major schools do after a season, evaluate each player and have a sit down in preparation for next season. And the problem would be, what?Two players left the team before spring practice: Cheeks and O'Reilly. I heard that one of these dismissals was not a mutual decision--the staff told the player they weren't going to play him.
Is it ethical to cut players like this, to make room for new players you oversigned? I am thinking no. I understand they were both set to graduate in spring, but if one of them was going to take up a scholarship in fall, they must have wanted to continue their education.
I'm sure some won't care but at Tech we have always believed in winning the right way.
GTFO Zulu; what an idiotic thread.
Stop making stuff up. Only think you're sure of is :ööööstir:
Ethical or unethical overposting by Zulu???
dumbass abounds
I stopped reading after you said, "I heard" with no link or cited source, but don't let me get in the way of you spreading unfounded rumors.
All of this.
The one thing unequivocally that former players say about CPJ is that he is honest and upfront with them.
Instead, we get zulu 'tardin' up the board w/this nonsense. Congrats, you got your reactions.
This thread is like questioning the Supreme Leader in North Korea. Sorry, CPJ is infallible and could not possibly do wrong--what was I thinking.
You must also consider that there may not be a graduate program at Tech that wants the kid either. Recall a few years ago when our MBA program, a top 20 national program, didn't admit some student-athletes although it had admitted others. Some transferred. There wasn't a problem with that, and the situation is largely analogous. The football scholarship is for an undergraduate education.
This thread is like questioning the Supreme Leader in North Korea. Sorry, CPJ is infallible and could not possibly do wrong--what was I thinking.
I remember we had a starting Guard that graduated and wanted to go to grad school but GT did not admit him to the MBA program. I forget his name. He was a false start machine though. Played his last year at Ga State I think.
Again, the kid in question will get his degree while on scholarship. If he wants another free year, why is it unethical to not allow it if we want to use the scholly on someone else? Answer the ööööing question or stop bleeding your vagina on the board.
We oversigned, then a kid was forced off the team without having done anything wrong (if the report is to be believed).
. It sounded bad on the surface:
Two players left the team before spring practice: Cheeks and O'Reilly. I heard* that one of these dismissals was not a mutual decision--the staff told the player they weren't going to play him.
Is it ethical to cut players like this, to make room for new players you oversigned? I am thinking no. I understand they were both set to graduate in spring, but if one of them was going to take up a scholarship in fall, they must have wanted to continue their education.
I'm sure some won't care but at Tech we have always believed in winning the right way.
*I'm told the source on this was a Rivals practice report.
Both were 5th year players who have finished their 4 year degrees...
false.
All of this.
The one thing unequivocally that former players say about CPJ is that he is honest and upfront with them.
.