Final AP Poll

This board would literally just be me posting 'lol' and 'ded' about 50 times in each game thread. Not because I'd be coming around here anymore, but because I have that automated now and I'm too lazy to stop it.
This post seems like something you'd automate too though. So really there's no way to know if I'm talking to you or your robot.
 
We've finished ranked at 8-4 (2001?).and now unranked at 9-4. SEC media bias is the only reason GT did not finish the season in the top 25. This is why it's BS when some of our own fans say "preseason rankings don't matter". They clearly do and have an adverse effect on schools not in the SEC.
 
Honestly I bet most voters wouldn't even be able to tell you our final record.
 
None of this matters if we clean up in early 2017. We get the Vols. FSU gets Bama. Wolfpack gets the Gamecocks. Clemson without Deshaun gets Auburn in week 2.

Win 3 of those 4, and the early rankings will get hammered. The entire season will be a delight with all the spin, and ESPN will be forced to act like it knew from the beginning that the ACC has been just as good as the SEC for years.
 
Win 3 of those 4, and the early rankings will get hammered. The entire season will be a delight with all the spin, and ESPN will be forced to act like it knew from the beginning that the ACC has been just as good as the SEC for years.

No way that happens. The headlines yesterday on ESPN were:

"Clemson beats Bama by being Bama"
"Did Clemson win or did Bama lose?"
"Way too early 2017 Top 25: Bama, FSU"

ESPN has too much at stake financially to admit that the SEC *might* not be as good as they initially hoped, and I don't foresee a change in their the constant droning of the SEC mantra. If the ACC does take 3/4 games, they'll chalk the losses up as flukes or just ignore in depth coverage as always. Hell, they'll probably even talk about how good the SEC will be in 2018 because "look at those recruiting classes! CHA!"
 
I'd recommission her back with my robot penis.
i_have_the_weirdest_boner_right_now_344.jpg
 
Honestly, most posters here fail the Turing test so it wouldn't have to pass that high a threshold.
Plus, I mean, the Turing test is exactly what the robot will be expecting. We need something else, something it'll never see coming. Maybe a pregnancy test? A drug screen?
 
Back
Top