Were you similarly bitching for the past 11 years when Coach Johnson failed to field a defense that had even a modicum of ability to stop the other teams? If not, then you're either a hypocrite, a dumbass or both. Hell, even in 2009 with 5 future NFL players starting on defense, we were forced to win games 50-48 or similar scores.
All of you saying that "Coach Johnson would have had a better offense than this" are absolutely correct. But I have eleven years of data to prove that he would have fielded a much poorer defense. And the players are essentially the same. So the same dumbasses (yeah...and by this, I'm definitely saying you're one of them) who are saying the coaches aren't doing their jobs because of the lack of offense are completely ignoring that the coaching staff took a defense that had 4 returning players and has made them much better. So making the "it's not talent" argument is actually proven incorrect by this. On defense, we didn't recruit for a defensive system that was vastly different from what everyone else is running...which has made it possible for us to have some actual hope that we will start to have some real defenses this year and in the near future. On offense, it's a bit harder to take a 295 guy who was recruited for a running offense and make him into a stud offensive linemen in only 4 games. Or to take a small framed A-back who can't catch and turn him into a slot receiver.
So, pick a side and stop being a little bitch. As for me, I choose to be a Tech fan and support the team and the coaching staff since they've only had 4 games to get an entirely new offensive system in place with players who weren't recruited for a passing offense. The same way I supported Johnson while he was here...because he was our coach and pulling against him would mean pulling against the team I love.