Here's a thought

Don't kid yourself, if we have another losing season there will be people on here blaming CPJ and the TO. They will do it forever. I can hear it now when CGC's contract runs out "he just couldn't overcome the mess CPJ left".
Isn't interesting how CPJ won? He went to two Orange Bowls, Peach Bowl, Gator Bowl. Think about this....The Arizona Wildcats have never been to the Rose Bowl, ever..... CPJ took Georgia Tech to two Orange Bowls... Yet somehow CPJ left Georgia Tech in a mess? I call BS on the excuse makers!
 
I wouldn’t consider Juanyeh, Tariq, Mason, Deveney, Ivey, McGowan, Swilling, Walker, etc. ill fitting
Congratulations, you can name players that left. Not all were ill-fitted. Do you know what a Venn diagram is? There are multiple circles, and sometimes they overlap.
 
Congratulations, you can name players that left. Not all were ill-fitted. Do you know what a Venn diagram is? There are multiple circles, and sometimes they overlap.
You’re saying the players that left were ill fitting. I wouldn’t consider a lot of our starters that were all conference and all Americans ill fitting. Maybe our back ups, but every team has back ups, going all the way back to heisman days.
 
Nerd beefs! This is great.
I’d say we could start a thread where people just argue with each other but that happens on every thread anyways…over a coach who has been terrible for 3 seasons and one that’s been gone for 4 years…
 
No, I said that ill-fitted players left, which is not the same as saying that the players that left are ill-fitting. Maybe you're dyslexic
You're making it seem as though the players that left were ill fitting, which is far from the truth.
 
You're making it seem as though the players that left were ill fitting, which is far from the truth.
Your poor comprehension is not my problem. You've outed yourself as stupid when you had the dyslexic route to save face
 
Your poor interpretation is not my fault. You've outed yourself as stupid when you had the dyslexic route to save face
That isn't poor interpretation. If you're talking about bench warmers, you're a moron. Nobody cares about the benchwarmers.
 
That isn't poor interpretation. If you're talking about bench warmers, you're a moron. Nobody cares about the benchwarmers.
No one is talking about benchwarmers, something else you pulled out of thin air.

Here's some reading

 
No one is talking about benchwarmers, something else you pulled out of thin air.

Here's some reading

I think I speak on behalf of everyone when I say this but…

you two need to kiss and make up. I will call the principal’s office.
 
I think I speak on behalf of everyone when I say this but…

you two need to kiss and make up. I will call the principal’s office.
He gets called out for dumb öööö on the regular then leaves for a day or two. I'm thinking it's just a fetish at this point
 
No one is talking about benchwarmers, something else you pulled out of thin air.

Here's some reading

Well those are the only players that left that were ill fitting, so I don't see what you're trying to say
 
who is saying 5 wins is acceptable? I posted what I think could happen, not what I want to happen. Maybe I misunderstood the point of the thread, though.
If we go 6-6 I would want to give him year 5, absolutely. We just have to see progress from the consecutive losing seasons. If I were AD, he would keep his job at 5-7. That is two more wins than in the past three seasons. At 4-8 I would lean toward making a change unless our compete level against all levels of competition was clearly improved. At 3-9 or worse in year 4, it has to be the end.
 
With three wins and three great recruiting years, we’ve kept him…. Who needs five wins if we recruit well again this year? Exiting him is crazy talk!

3-9 and a top 50 recruiting class works for me!
 
Here's a thought, I don't give two öööös about what a person still rocking a Paul Johnson AV has to think
 
Back
Top