GTWannaBee
Dodd-Like
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2006
- Messages
- 7,663
Again, that is hilarious coming from you.You literally use the “I’m rubber you’re glue” technique that every kid uses when they’re 5.
Again, that is hilarious coming from you.You literally use the “I’m rubber you’re glue” technique that every kid uses when they’re 5.
Isn't interesting how CPJ won? He went to two Orange Bowls, Peach Bowl, Gator Bowl. Think about this....The Arizona Wildcats have never been to the Rose Bowl, ever..... CPJ took Georgia Tech to two Orange Bowls... Yet somehow CPJ left Georgia Tech in a mess? I call BS on the excuse makers!Don't kid yourself, if we have another losing season there will be people on here blaming CPJ and the TO. They will do it forever. I can hear it now when CGC's contract runs out "he just couldn't overcome the mess CPJ left".
Congratulations, you can name players that left. Not all were ill-fitted. Do you know what a Venn diagram is? There are multiple circles, and sometimes they overlap.I wouldn’t consider Juanyeh, Tariq, Mason, Deveney, Ivey, McGowan, Swilling, Walker, etc. ill fitting
You’re literally doing it againAgain, that is hilarious coming from you.
You’re saying the players that left were ill fitting. I wouldn’t consider a lot of our starters that were all conference and all Americans ill fitting. Maybe our back ups, but every team has back ups, going all the way back to heisman days.Congratulations, you can name players that left. Not all were ill-fitted. Do you know what a Venn diagram is? There are multiple circles, and sometimes they overlap.
No, I said that ill-fitted players left, which is not the same as saying that the players that left are ill-fitting. Maybe you're dyslexicYou’re saying the players that left were ill fitting.
You're making it seem as though the players that left were ill fitting, which is far from the truth.No, I said that ill-fitted players left, which is not the same as saying that the players that left are ill-fitting. Maybe you're dyslexic
Your poor comprehension is not my problem. You've outed yourself as stupid when you had the dyslexic route to save faceYou're making it seem as though the players that left were ill fitting, which is far from the truth.
That isn't poor interpretation. If you're talking about bench warmers, you're a moron. Nobody cares about the benchwarmers.Your poor interpretation is not my fault. You've outed yourself as stupid when you had the dyslexic route to save face
No one is talking about benchwarmers, something else you pulled out of thin air.That isn't poor interpretation. If you're talking about bench warmers, you're a moron. Nobody cares about the benchwarmers.
I think I speak on behalf of everyone when I say this but…No one is talking about benchwarmers, something else you pulled out of thin air.
Here's some reading
Association fallacy
The association fallacy, also known as guilt by association, is an informal fallacy that is committed when a person, belief, or group is attacked or defended on the basis that it has something in common with a positively or negatively viewed person, belief, or group. It is, to an extent, a form...rationalwiki.org
He gets called out for dumb öööö on the regular then leaves for a day or two. I'm thinking it's just a fetish at this pointI think I speak on behalf of everyone when I say this but…
you two need to kiss and make up. I will call the principal’s office.
Well those are the only players that left that were ill fitting, so I don't see what you're trying to sayNo one is talking about benchwarmers, something else you pulled out of thin air.
Here's some reading
Association fallacy
The association fallacy, also known as guilt by association, is an informal fallacy that is committed when a person, belief, or group is attacked or defended on the basis that it has something in common with a positively or negatively viewed person, belief, or group. It is, to an extent, a form...rationalwiki.org
who is saying 5 wins is acceptable? I posted what I think could happen, not what I want to happen. Maybe I misunderstood the point of the thread, though.
If we go 6-6 I would want to give him year 5, absolutely. We just have to see progress from the consecutive losing seasons. If I were AD, he would keep his job at 5-7. That is two more wins than in the past three seasons. At 4-8 I would lean toward making a change unless our compete level against all levels of competition was clearly improved. At 3-9 or worse in year 4, it has to be the end.