I was afraid of VpissU yesterday...

Red Zone Stats

[/B]Aside: Amazingly, UVA is one of 3 teams with 100% red zone scoring.

If you think about how their offense is constructed, it's not that amazing. Huge OLine, solid RB, mobile QB and typically (I don't know it to be the case this season) a great TE.
 
If you think about how their offense is constructed, it's not that amazing. Huge OLine, solid RB, mobile QB and typically (I don't know it to be the case this season) a great TE.

There are only 3 teams in the country with 100% red zone point conversions. I would say that's pretty amazing no matter who it is.
 
If there was an emoticon for putting my head in my hands in complete embarassment, I would use that in my reply to this thread. Unfortunately, there isn't.
 
If there was an emoticon for putting my head in my hands in complete embarassment, I would use that in my reply to this thread. Unfortunately, there isn't.

BOR reading this thread:

china_needle404_675809c.jpg
 
But today I actually feel very good about this game.

Statistically they haven't done much better this season than we have:

GT O: 426.27 YPG
GT D: 385.12 YPG
VT O: 387.67 YPG
VT D: 316.33 YPG

We make the assumption that the GT O vs VT D and GT D vs VT O will balance out by averaging the yards per game allowed and gained:

GT expected yards: (426.67+310.53)/2 = 368.50
VT expected yards: (387.67+385.17)/2 = 386.42
Which gives VT a 17.92 yard advantage.

But that doesn't tell the whole story. How do the strengths of GT match up with the strengths of VT? How about ball control? How about Rush vs Pass tendencies?

GT rush O: 318 plays, 5.23 YPC
GT pass O: 75 plays, 11.97 YPA
GT rush D: 4.19 YPC
GT pass D: 8.01 YPA
GT plays allowed: 381
GT total plays: 393
VT rush O: 266 plays, 4.7 YPC
VT pass O: 109 plays, 9.86 YPA
VT rush D: 3.59 YPC
VT pass D: 6.07 YPA
VT plays allowed: 393
VT total plays: 375

First we find the average YPC and YPA by averaging allowed and gained yards.
Then we find the ratio of pass and rush plays to total plays a team uses.
Then you multiply the ratios by their respective expected values per play and add the results.
This gives you the expected yards per play by each team.
Then you find the average of the number of plays allowed and executed by opposing O vs D to establish ball control.
Finally, divide that by the number of games and you get your answer:

GT expected yards:
[(318/393)(5.23+3.59)/2+(75/393)(11.97+6.07)/2](393+393)/(2*6) = 348.48

VT expected yards:
[(266/375)(4.70+4.19)/2+(109/375)(9.86+8.01)/2](375+381)/(2*6) = 362.25

which gives VT a 13.77 yard avantage.
(ironically GT actually helps VT by allowing more plays than VT normally executes)

Then you have to throw strength of schedule in there courtesy of the Sagarin ratings:

The Sagarin rankings give VTs SOS a .7894 (#2 in the nation) value and GTs SOS a .7449 value (#15 in the nation).

So not really knowing how these values were computed I will try to apply them in some way that makes sense...

So I will normalize the rankings so that the average is 1 and see what the result is:

GT multiplier = .7447*2/(.7894+.7447 ) = .9709
VT multiplier = .7894*2/(.7894+.7447 ) = 1.0291
GT expected yards = 338.34
VT expected yards = 372.81

Which gives VT a 34.47 yard advantage.

I would say that home field advantage covers this alone, but throw in emotion, revenge, and what's at stake and I think GT could win handily.

Thoughts?


Thoughts??? Yes, you just got my ass dizzy as ****

But hey...I'm with ya

I concur if that's what youre asking
 
At some point Saturday night someone on the GT D will have to step up and make a game changing play or three. FSU might have a better O than VT but VT is much more of a complete team. We have a great chance at winning this football game but our margin for error is very thin. So I say everyone (except the players) take the next three days off of work or school to get your ***** mind right. Mandatory alcohol abuse for all stingtalk users...
 
Back
Top