I stopped taking the story seriously when the article invoked the provisions of Title IX in a rape investigation.
If I'm an idiot for not understanding the nexus then fine but it sounds to me like they are trying to drop the biggest hammer in the history of hammers down on these kids just to make the point to the entire universe that Minnesota is not Baylor.
I obviously don't know the details but trying to turn a rape investigation into a civil rights case sounds a bit over the top. Besides, the players themselves are not governed by Title 9 - the university is.
I also noted that the coach is siding with the players. That is not always a good sign [/Briles] but in this case, I think it probably is.
One more question. If not playing in the bowl has a materially detrimental economic impact on a player's NFL draft status and that player is subsequently cleared of any suspicion of wrongdoing, can that player then file a reverse discrimination suit against Minnesota and the NCAA?
To be honest, i don't really care whether it's rape, sexual assault or what. If i am the coach of a team where 10 guys öööö a girl I'm kicking all of them off the team anyway. That's not how you act and it's not something that needs to be associated with my school or team.