Interview with Wommack

Ranking my concerns about the team prior to reading this article:

1. DTs
2. Dave Wommack
3. OL
4. CBs

After reading this article, there may be a tie for top spot.
 
Can someone copy-paste the article in full? Blocked at work :(
 
Much of the attention Georgia Tech has received this preseason has been focused on Jonathan Dwyer and the Jackets' stable of running backs. If they're going to contend for the Coastal Division title, though, the defense will have to hold its weight, too, and the Jackets have to replace three of four starters up front. I caught up with defensive coordinator Dave Wommack to check in on the defense heading into summer camp.
ncf_i_wommack_200.jpg
Todd Kirkland/Icon SMI Entering 2009, Dave Wommack has some holes to fill on his defensive line. Are you changing anything? I've heard some rumblings about maybe a different scheme this year.
DW: We may change up some things a little bit, but I think it may be based [more] on personnel than it will anything else. We'll see when we get into two-a-days, but there's not going to be any drastic changes.
Are there things you saw in the spring on the defensive line that give you concerns that are forcing you to tinker with it?
DW: [He laughed]. Just inexperience. When you lose three guys to the draft, it's just a matter of inexperience. I think we've got some good, young guys that are coming up. They just haven't played very much. That's the biggest thing, but no, that's not why we're changing. It's really our experience is more in the secondary, maybe get more five DBs on the field more than anything else.
Yeah, tell me about that group a little bit. You have a lot of guys coming back, especially with Morgan Burnett.
DW: It kind of flips. Now your most-experienced players are guys that have played one year. I'm looking forward to the secondary. I think it will be a strength for us with Morgan leading the way.
What more can he do? What are you expecting from him this year?
DW: Really that's the thing that concerns me as much as anything, because Morgan wants to make every play. It's really, Morgan, stay within the framework of your defense. Don't let your eyes get you in trouble. The play is going to come your way. You're a featured stop for us on defense, so don't try to do more than what you need to do because the defense will break down. So I don't think it's so much asking him to do more, just really do what you've done. Don't try to do too much.

Who are some of the young players on the roster that Georgia Tech fans are going to get to know?

DW: One of them is a big guy, T.J. Barnes, a defensive lineman for us from Enterprise, Ala. He is a large human being. Last fall he got up to 363 and now we've got him down to about 340. He's a guy who needs to step up and play a major role for us. And then I think some younger linebackers, Steven Sylvester has come along, Malcolm Munroe has come along. A true freshman came in, Emmanuel Dieke, we call him Too Tall. He came in about 220 and thought for sure he was going to be a redshirt project. Man, he had a great spring. He's over 250 now and he's 6-[foot]-5 so I think those guys are going to be the guys you're going to see. Jerrard Tarrant will return. He was our best corner and had to sit out last season. He'll return this year. I know I'm leaving people out. There was a lot of young guys who didn't play last year who will be given an opportunity to play in the two-deep. It's hard to single them out right now, until you go through two-a-days, but there was a lot of progress made with those guys last spring as well.
How rusty is Jerrard Tarrant? What was he doing last year?
DW: He was going to school. He didn't practice at all last year, so, yeah, there was some rust to knock off, but he's young, and I thought he bounced back pretty well from the standpoint of after four or five days getting back to the swing of it and doing what we needed him to do. I thought he made a lot of progress that was noticeable. If not a first-teamer, he'll play a lot this year.
I imagine you have pretty high expectations for that linebacking corps. You've got a lot of guys back there, right?
DW: Yep, and so many of them were hurt last year it seemed like it was kind of a hit or miss deal with the linebackers. I don't know if any two of them got to play or three of them got to play more than a game or two, so hopefully we have more depth. I know we redshirted some guys, but you've got Brad [Jefferson], Anthony Barnes, and Sedric [Griffin] returning with experience. I think the key is to keep those guys on the field this year and bring the other guys along.
How much more comfortable is everybody in terms of the playbook, the scheme, now that this is your second year in the system?
DW: I think it makes a tremendous difference. Once they've been through it two springs now and then a whole year, they know what to expect and how to do the little things. They got thousands of reps in those things we didn't have before, and they know my personality and I know their personalities. I told them this spring, I thought there was a real closeness on this unit. It's not one of those deals where there's really one star that ones to shine. We've got some good players who care about each other and they've worked hard to this point.
I'm assuming your main concern for summer camp is going to be getting that D-line together?
DW: Well, it is, but I'm not trying to put anything on Giff Smith, our defensive line coach. He does a tremendous job, and he builds a relationship with those guys, and he brings a real passion and caring and wants to be good. I think they'll step up, but I'm not ignorant enough to sit here and think you're going to replace those guys overnight. There will be some times we'll have to load the box, bring more players into the box against the run just because of that, I'm sure at times. But that's fine, too. And then you go on and your secondary is more experienced and your linebackers are more experienced. Every year in college you're going to lose a group, especially when you don't have the depth. Until we get in there and have guys like a piece of the puzzle and step right in, it's going to be important for us to stay healthy this year.
 
Ranking my concerns about the team prior to reading this article:

1. DTs
2. Dave Wommack
3. OL
4. CBs

After reading this article, there may be a tie for top spot.
Point out to me where Wommack said anything really dumb or disturbing in this. I'd be worried if he actually started talking strategy.
 
Ranking my concerns about the team prior to reading this article:

1. DTs
2. Dave Wommack
3. OL
4. CBs

After reading this article, there may be a tie for top spot.

What? Why is Wommack such a concern? What was it specifically in that article that makes you worried? Last year he did a very good job. Hell we found out that our secondary is a strength, which it never was under Tenuta. Wommack actually develops these guys instead of blitzing 24-7 to cover up a weakness. Does anyone even recognize what Wommack accomplished at Southern Miss? Because if you don't know what he did at Southern Miss, you just need to STFU. The guy is a solid DC.
 
Apparently I am the only guy in this thread that watched the last 5 games of last season, or at least, the only guy in this thread that understood what he was seeing from the defense.

If Wommack doesn't see the need for change in his scheme, he doesn't understand that OCs had adjusted to his scheme by the end of the year, and were trashing it. Even Miami and Nix would have scored a lot of points if they could have completed passes to very open receivers.

Tenuta did so much more with no more talent than Wommack had last year. Tenuta understood how to hide talent deficiencies. Wommack did not do that last year, and this interview does not express concern over the way the year ended. If that doesn't concern you, you have your head up your butt.

Maybe Wommack has plans that he does not want to air publicly. That would be smart, and I hope it's true. However, last year's performance--and failure to adjust-- suggests otherwise.

By the comments in this thread, Stingtalk posters continue to demostrate the lowest football IQs of all the GT boards. Most people who have football knowledge have moved away from this board because they are attacked by posters who love to swim in their self created mire of ignorance. Most Stingtalk regulars are like a bunch of backwoods close minded inbreads who cast dispersions on outsiders due to a fear of their own inadequacies.

I'll let you go back to things you know about, like uniform colors and intro songs.
 
Most Stingtalk regulars are like a bunch of backwoods close minded inbreads who cast dispersions on outsiders due to a fear of their own inadequacies.

You are in serious need of professional help.
 
You know your argument might of been able to convince people of your opinion until you threw in those last few sentences.
 
Apparently I am the only guy in this thread that watched the last 5 games of last season, or at least, the only guy in this thread that understood what he was seeing from the defense.

If Wommack doesn't see the need for change in his scheme, he doesn't understand that OCs had adjusted to his scheme by the end of the year, and were trashing it. Even Miami and Nix would have scored a lot of points if they could have completed passes to very open receivers.

Tenuta did so much more with no more talent than Wommack had last year. Tenuta understood how to hide talent deficiencies. Wommack did not do that last year, and this interview does not express concern over the way the year ended. If that doesn't concern you, you have your head up your butt.

Maybe Wommack has plans that he does not want to air publicly. That would be smart, and I hope it's true. However, last year's performance--and failure to adjust-- suggests otherwise.

By the comments in this thread, Stingtalk posters continue to demostrate the lowest football IQs of all the GT boards. Most people who have football knowledge have moved away from this board because they are attacked by posters who love to swim in their self created mire of ignorance. Most Stingtalk regulars are like a bunch of backwoods close minded inbreads who cast dispersions on outsiders due to a fear of their own inadequacies.

I'll let you go back to things you know about, like uniform colors and intro songs.

I can tell from your response that you have a hard time evaluating what you see on the football field. Its funny how you toss out insults when you don;t know dick about what you are talking about. If you think the hive and bbuzzoff have high football IQ's, then that tells me all I need to know.

LSU's point production was due to mostly special teams screw ups and an ineffective offense.

UGA was probably a top 5 offense in the country, and when we needed to stop them, we managed to get it done to win the game.

UNC, again, poor special teams and poor offensive control.

What other games did you look at genius? Seriously? Which ones? What Wommack did infinitely better than Tenuta was adjust. He also managed to use our secondary where we led the league in INTS. Tenuta never developed or adjusted. If Tenuta's scheme didn't work, we got the **** blown out of us everytime.

Are you familiar with Wommack's work at Southern Miss? Do you recall those defenses in the late 90's, 2000, and 2001?
 
By the comments in this thread, Stingtalk posters continue to demostrate the lowest football IQs of all the GT boards. Most people who have football knowledge have moved away from this board because they are attacked by posters who love to swim in their self created mire of ignorance. Most Stingtalk regulars are like a bunch of backwoods close minded inbreads who cast dispersions on outsiders due to a fear of their own inadequacies.

Beeware is that you? Dumbass.
 
I do remember quite a few wide open receivers during the FSU and Miami games.
 
I do remember quite a few wide open receivers during the FSU and Miami games.

Then again, you can't always say its the offenses fault for not getting the wide open receivers. I remember one time where Miami had two wide open receivers. Didn't do them any good cause Marve was busy running for his life from Derrick Morgan.
 
]Tenuta never developed or adjusted. If Tenuta's scheme didn't work, we got the **** blown out of us everytime
At the end of last season I noticed that there was really not a game in which an offense just totally picked apart our defense, something that happened at least once (or more) a year with Tenuta. Tenuta's D played many incredible games for us, and won us a fair share of games too, but there was always a game or two every season where they were just completely picked apart.
 
It's too early to judge Wommack for the most part. We can't imagine what kind of difficulty the defensive players might of faced switching from Tenuta to Wommack. Comparatively to what other people run, changing from Tenuta's defense to a traditional one could be liked to a school going from running the our offense to running Gailey's offense.
 
Back
Top