KEY IS MY HEADCOACH!!!

Head coach

  • Keep Key

    Votes: 115 66.9%
  • Hire someone else

    Votes: 57 33.1%

  • Total voters
    172
  • Poll closed .
Proven winners.
This obsession some have with Art Briles is ööööing retarded. He hasn't coached any meaningful football in 7 years and the last coaching he did in the states he got the school in trouble by using ineligible players and they had a better year the next year he was gone. Put all of his scandal stuff aside and it's just stupid based on recent performance
 
This obsession some have with Art Briles is ööööing retarded. He hasn't coached any meaningful football in 7 years and the last coaching he did in the states he got the school in trouble by using ineligible players and they had a better year the next year he was gone. Put all of his scandal stuff aside and it's just stupid based on recent performance
Sorry if it hurt your fee fees
 
We are competent under Key. Vast improvement.

Imagine if we paid our tight ends like UGa does..
 
no matter who we get, its going to be 3 years before we know if we ööööed up.


00e70166-a00f-4531-80b5-04525779e773_text.gif
Not necessarily. We could know a lot sooner. More accurate is it's going to be 3 years before we try again.
 
I really don't get how 4-4 and losses at home vs ööööty Miami and Virginia teams warrants an easy decision. Not saying I'm completely anti-Key, but too many people seem to be riding him after an average set of performances at best. The wins were all pretty ugly and close as well.
I don't know many that are saying it's easy to choose Key, they seem to me to be just saying it's a decision that can make sense. Both have their negative points. Key lost a tough game to UVA when his starting QB went out and the (then) #2 just wasn't ready. Certainly not good, but in the course of things this season, understandable. Miami simply has better personnel and the O decided to give the ball to them 4x. Part of that problem was that we were somehow picked to win that game - it was always a long shot. Again, no ugly loss is good, but we lose that game 4 of 5 times anyway. You cannot dismiss them, but neither should we make them determinative.
Chadwell, at the end of his 4th full season - with his coaches and his players, just got absolutely boat-raced by the major competition in his own conference. You can't possibly undersell that, but it should not be determinative either. However, when you look deeper at his W/L, you see he's racked up the numbers largely against bad teams. The ACC has come of those, but Tech has UGAg, Clemson, ND, FSU, UNC, and a few OOC's like Ole Miss, UT, etc. It's just a much tougher league. If he cannot, in his 4th season, hang with JMU then how is he going to scale up to what he would face at Tech week after week? That is my concern. Plus... it's just a whole new start-over. I'm tired of starting over.
 
This obsession some have with Art Briles is ööööing retarded. He hasn't coached any meaningful football in 7 years and the last coaching he did in the states he got the school in trouble by using ineligible players and they had a better year the next year he was gone. Put all of his scandal stuff aside and it's just stupid based on recent performance
And almost every single high-powered spread offense in college football is a carbon-copy of his, to this day
 
I’ve watched our Oline under perform since Key joined Collins here. It’s hard for me to forget the job I believe he’s done with that group. With that said, he has earned my respect with what he did as interim HC. Is not fair to forget that either. When I step back and look at the entirety of our schedule, it’s difficult not to recognize how bad our conference was this year and yet we still didn’t make a bowl game. Keeping him is a nice story, but I have to believe there is a better option but I couldn’t tell you who that is. At the end of the day, we need a large NIL collective to support whoever the next coach is. That’s probably as or more important at this time. Whatever happens Long can’t be calling plays next year.
 
I don't know many that are saying it's easy to choose Key, they seem to me to be just saying it's a decision that can make sense. Both have their negative points. Key lost a tough game to UVA when his starting QB went out and the (then) #2 just wasn't ready. Certainly not good, but in the course of things this season, understandable. Miami simply has better personnel and the O decided to give the ball to them 4x. Part of that problem was that we were somehow picked to win that game - it was always a long shot. Again, no ugly loss is good, but we lose that game 4 of 5 times anyway. You cannot dismiss them, but neither should we make them determinative.
Chadwell, at the end of his 4th full season - with his coaches and his players, just got absolutely boat-raced by the major competition in his own conference. You can't possibly undersell that, but it should not be determinative either. However, when you look deeper at his W/L, you see he's racked up the numbers largely against bad teams. The ACC has come of those, but Tech has UGAg, Clemson, ND, FSU, UNC, and a few OOC's like Ole Miss, UT, etc. It's just a much tougher league. If he cannot, in his 4th season, hang with JMU then how is he going to scale up to what he would face at Tech week after week? That is my concern. Plus... it's just a whole new start-over. I'm tired of starting over.
This very thread title weakens the argument of your first sentence.
 
Back
Top