Olgoldandwhie
Flats Noob
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2019
- Messages
- 788
Wake me when any of the big boys get penalized.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wake me when any of the big boys get penalized.
Wait until they find out there is somebody named Adidas giving our players warm up suits.ncaa about to come down hard on us.
All I really want to know is did we give the damn trophy back? I would have lost that like Kennedy’s brain.You guys haven't figured out yet that...
~it's ok to pay players
~it's ok to set up false classes and give out false grades
~it's ok to win at all costs
...but
~it's NOT ok for a player to receive $312 in apparel, never use it, and return it
If you didn't know that players are paid, then you have your head in the sand.
All I really want to know is did we give the damn trophy back? I would have lost that like Kennedy’s brain.
30% depending on the school. <10 % at Georgia Tech--half a dozen kids, or relatives, in any given year.I wonder what the percentage of players paid is
While obviously this violates NCAA rules on amateurism, it doesn't quite seem like the kind of payments-to-players that we usually get worked up about – because these payments were by an agent trying to woo players to choose him as their agent, not payments by schools or school boosters trying to woo players to sign with the school. Granted that the assistant coaches shouldn't have been facilitating the transfers, but it's really got nothing to do with the kind of booster shenanigans we clean-living Tech fans get self-righteous about.Illegally.
https://www.cbssports.com/college-f...-players-at-major-programs-from-2000-to-2014/
He has allegedly paid players to choose him as an agent. Players from Alabama, Notre Dame, Penn state, Michigan and others.
The colleges probably knew what he was doing and turned a blind eyeWhile obviously this violates NCAA rules on amateurism, it doesn't quite seem like the kind of payments-to-players that we usually get worked up about – because these payments were by an agent trying to woo players to choose him as their agent, not payments by schools or school boosters trying to woo players to sign with the school. Granted that the assistant coaches shouldn't have been facilitating the transfers, but it's really got nothing to do with the kind of booster shenanigans we clean-living Tech fans get self-righteous about.
Although I'm a big proponent of the amateurism principle, this kind of payment is really hard to get excited about. The kids aren't being paid by the school to play; they're receiving loans from agents trying to woo them as clients. Heaven knows when I was a law student the best students received all sorts of inducements from potential employers – not loans, but fancy dinners and parties and cushy summer jobs and the like – all things that would render us non-amateurs from the NCAA's perspective. I think this is fundamentally different from boosters/schools paying HS students to play football, provided the money is actually the agent's, and provided all schools give agents access (or not) equally. But this kind of thing should be allowed, within limits, without affecting your amateur status.The colleges probably knew what he was doing and turned a blind eye
I’m not arguing it should or shouldn’t be allowed, just that I’m sure the colleges know about it.Although I'm a big proponent of the amateurism principle, this kind of payment is really hard to get excited about. The kids aren't being paid by the school to play; they're receiving loans from agents trying to woo them as clients. Heaven knows when I was a law student the best students received all sorts of inducements from potential employers – not loans, but fancy dinners and parties and cushy summer jobs and the like – all things that would render us non-amateurs from the NCAA's perspective. I think this is fundamentally different from boosters/schools paying HS students to play football, provided the money is actually the agent's, and provided all schools give agents access (or not) equally. But this kind of thing should be allowed, within limits, without affecting your amateur status.
I don't think CFB is being ruined – this tension has existed from Day 1. For a long time giving scholarships was itself considered a threat to amateurism.I’m not arguing it should or shouldn’t be allowed, just that I’m sure the colleges know about it.
As for what should or shouldn’t be allowed, my argument is either make the rules such that discovering payment is easy and the penalties are so severe to deter the practice, or make paying legal and in the light. As it is, college football is being ruined.
I’d have to put a lot of thought into that. Financial disclosing requirements would be an idea of the top of my head.I don't think CFB is being ruined – this tension has existed from Day 1. For a long time giving scholarships was itself considered a threat to amateurism.
Anyhow, how do you make the rules such that discovering payment is easy?
For the S/A's?I’d have to put a lot of thought into that. Financial disclosing requirements would be an idea of the top of my head.
YeaFor the S/A's?
That seems pretty unfair to all the guys who aren't cheating. That's a level of intrusiveness that we wouldn't tolerate in almost any other arena.