law_bee
Dodd-Like
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2001
- Messages
- 6,399
AJC has some more info on alleged rape
http://www.ajc.com/metro/content/metro/atlanta/stories/2008/06/30/georgia_tech_tarrant_rape.html
1. "I drank alcohol at the party so it wasn't hard for him to get me to go to his room," that statement alone from the V may rise to reasonable doubt
2. two different statements from the V MAY BE a problem as well
3. It appears that V argues D was kissing V consensually until it got down to vaginal area. If this is V's statement then this will be a problem for the state as well. Although technically a female or male can say NO at anytime juries do not always see it that way.
4. Forced oral sex (D on V) is going to be difficult to prove w/o bruising on arms and legs IMO
If the defense lawyer does a good job I think the defense has a decent chance.
I just looked this lawyer up and he is in Garland and Samuel's office so it appears D has hired best the best firm around. Ed Garland is the best lawyer in GA IMO
JUST TO BE CLEAR I DON'T KNOW WHAT HAPPENED I AM JUST GIVING MY OPINION BASED ON NEWS ACCOUNTS IN THE PUBLIC MEDIA
http://www.ajc.com/metro/content/metro/atlanta/stories/2008/06/30/georgia_tech_tarrant_rape.html
Here is the problem's for the state IMOThe woman made two statements to police, the first on the morning of the incident and the second, more detailed statement almost a month later, on May 20, after she returned from her home in Tennessee. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution does not identify victims of sexual assault.
She said she had her guard down that night.
"I drank alcohol at the party so it wasn't hard for him to get me to go to his room," she wrote in her first statement.
But once she got to Tarrant's room and he began touching her, she told him to stop because she had a boyfriend. He said that's when the oral sex ended. She said he soon started again and continued despite her continued pleas to stop.
1. "I drank alcohol at the party so it wasn't hard for him to get me to go to his room," that statement alone from the V may rise to reasonable doubt
2. two different statements from the V MAY BE a problem as well
3. It appears that V argues D was kissing V consensually until it got down to vaginal area. If this is V's statement then this will be a problem for the state as well. Although technically a female or male can say NO at anytime juries do not always see it that way.
4. Forced oral sex (D on V) is going to be difficult to prove w/o bruising on arms and legs IMO
If the defense lawyer does a good job I think the defense has a decent chance.
I just looked this lawyer up and he is in Garland and Samuel's office so it appears D has hired best the best firm around. Ed Garland is the best lawyer in GA IMO
JUST TO BE CLEAR I DON'T KNOW WHAT HAPPENED I AM JUST GIVING MY OPINION BASED ON NEWS ACCOUNTS IN THE PUBLIC MEDIA