http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/feioff
Would like to see the final stats, but looking at these stats is pretty unbelievable. GT's OFEI (opponent-adjusted offensive efficiency) is .968, with the next best at .722 (Auburn) and .718 (Oregon). You can also see where we compare to Oregon in explosive drives (drives averaging >10 yards/play) and methodical drives (percentage of drives with more than 10 plays). I do not pretend to understand the details behind these stats, especially FEI, thoroughly, but basically they suggest that GT has the most efficient offense, Oregon has a very efficient and more explosive offense, and GT has the most methodical offense. Typical fans and media love explosive offense, probably because it appears to suggest the ability to score more points more often.
In this day and age, it still amazes me that I can go on the most prolific sports website in the country and offenses and defenses are ranked by points scored and points allowed, which are basically just vacuum statistics that have no meaning other than the stat itself. Assuming no field goals, would you rather have an offense that scores 6 touchdowns on 9 possessions or an offense that scores 9 touchdowns on 15 possessions? The answer is pretty clear statistically, but it is even more clear when you factor in other considerations, such as the theory that a tired offense scores against a tired defense more often than a rested offense scores against a rested defense. Meaning, if you have 9 possessions a game and the opponent has 8-10, the defense will be on the field for less snaps than the defense of the team that has 14-16 possessions to defend against.
I imagine I am preaching to the choir here, but at some point one would hope the media could actually give value to meaningful rather than arbitrary statistics. I'm sure that will happen about as soon as Joe Simpson accepts that OPS is more meaningful than batting average.