Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
why do you have ties in there?
Who are the 5 teams we "lost" to in the round-robin?
Predictor Poll said:#1: ('CLEM', [126, 0, 0, 3627])
#2: ('GT', [125, 1, 0, 4758])
#3: ('OSU', [124, 2, 0, 5536])
#4: ('ALA', [123, 3, 0, 4121])
#5: ('MISS', [120, 6, 0, 3945])
#6: ('USC', [120, 6, 0, 3285])
#7: ('FLA', [120, 6, 0, 3123])
#8: ('TCU', [119, 7, 0, 3528])
#9: ('ARK', [119, 7, 0, 2199])
#10: ('UGA', [118, 8, 0, 3308])
#11: ('FSU', [116, 10, 0, 3335])
#12: ('ORE', [115, 11, 0, 3992])
#13: ('MSU', [115, 11, 0, 3300])
#14: ('MIA', [113, 13, 0, 2829])
#15: ('MSST', [112, 14, 0, 2255])
#16: ('BC', [110, 16, 0, 2452])
#17: ('UCLA', [110, 16, 0, 2041])
#18: ('LSU', [109, 17, 0, 1413])
#19: ('BAY', [108, 18, 0, 3744])
#20: ('LT', [106, 20, 0, 3185])
#21: ('STAN', [106, 20, 0, 1447])
#22: ('NCST', [105, 21, 0, 2308])
#23: ('OKLA', [105, 21, 0, 1787])
#24: ('BYU', [103, 23, 0, 1983])
#25: ('CSU', [101, 25, 0, 2242])
Predictor said:CLEM vs LOU(+6)
Week 3 of 2014
CLEM - Offense
Yardage: 394 ypg
Performance: 11 (higher is better)
Scoring: 32
Efficiency: 12 (lower is better)
Performance: 21 (higher is better)
CLEM - Defense
Yardage: 249 ypg allowed
Performance: 79 (higher is better)
Scoring: 14
Efficiency: 17 (higher is better)
Performance: 23 (higher is better)
LOU - Offense
Yardage: 436 ypg
Performance: 16 (higher is better)
Scoring: 33
Efficiency: 13 (lower is better)
Performance: 7 (higher is better)
LOU - Defense
Yardage: 371 ypg allowed
Performance: 15 (higher is better)
Scoring: 32
Efficiency: 11 (higher is better)
Performance: -14 (higher is better)
Prediction:
Pure statistical: CLEM 34 (328 yards), LOU 9 (146 yards)
CLEM best case: CLEM 44 (387 yards), LOU 3 (63 yards)
LOU best case: CLEM 23 (266 yards), LOU 18 (292 yards)
CLEM talent: 10803
LOU talent: 6316
CLEM talent of schedule: 3343
LOU talent of schedule: 8279
Suggested talent adjustment: 2% towards LOU best case
Final: CLEM 34 (327 yards), LOU 9 (149 yards)
Predictor said:FSU vs BC(+8.5)
Week 3 of 2014
FSU - Offense
Yardage: 439 ypg
Performance: 35 (higher is better)
Scoring: 35
Efficiency: 12 (lower is better)
Performance: 21 (higher is better)
FSU - Defense
Yardage: 353 ypg allowed
Performance: 17 (higher is better)
Scoring: 22
Efficiency: 15 (higher is better)
Performance: 33 (higher is better)
BC - Offense
Yardage: 337 ypg
Performance: -5 (higher is better)
Scoring: 32
Efficiency: 10 (lower is better)
Performance: 29 (higher is better)
BC - Defense
Yardage: 235 ypg allowed
Performance: 64 (higher is better)
Scoring: 16
Efficiency: 14 (higher is better)
Performance: 2 (higher is better)
Prediction:
Pure statistical: FSU 19 (228 yards), BC 23 (283 yards)
FSU best case: FSU 28 (317 yards), BC 18 (256 yards)
BC best case: FSU 11 (135 yards), BC 32 (332 yards)
FSU talent: 12366
BC talent: 4933
FSU talent of schedule: 6335
BC talent of schedule: 5097
Suggested talent adjustment: 43% towards FSU best case
Final: FSU 23 (266 yards), BC 21 (271 yards)
Predictor said:ILL vs UNC(-9.5)
Week 3 of 2014
ILL - Offense
Yardage: 321 ypg
Performance: 3 (higher is better)
Scoring: 28
Efficiency: 11 (lower is better)
Performance: 22 (higher is better)
ILL - Defense
Yardage: 363 ypg allowed
Performance: 8 (higher is better)
Scoring: 20
Efficiency: 17 (higher is better)
Performance: 36 (higher is better)
UNC - Offense
Yardage: 412 ypg
Performance: 32 (higher is better)
Scoring: 29
Efficiency: 13 (lower is better)
Performance: 13 (higher is better)
UNC - Defense
Yardage: 410 ypg allowed
Performance: 3 (higher is better)
Scoring: 28
Efficiency: 14 (higher is better)
Performance: 15 (higher is better)
Prediction:
Pure statistical: ILL 27 (368 yards), UNC 25 (454 yards)
ILL best case: ILL 37 (430 yards), UNC 19 (374 yards)
UNC best case: ILL 19 (307 yards), UNC 32 (509 yards)
ILL talent: 4972
UNC talent: 7429
ILL talent of schedule: 5423
UNC talent of schedule: 3920
Suggested talent adjustment: 4% towards UNC best case
Final: ILL 27 (365 yards), UNC 25 (457 yards)
Predictor said:NW vs DUKE(-3.5)
Week 3 of 2014
NW - Offense
Yardage: 374 ypg
Performance: 9 (higher is better)
Scoring: 22
Efficiency: 16 (lower is better)
Performance: -20 (higher is better)
NW - Defense
Yardage: 325 ypg allowed
Performance: 26 (higher is better)
Scoring: 18
Efficiency: 17 (higher is better)
Performance: 11 (higher is better)
DUKE - Offense
Yardage: 418 ypg
Performance: 15 (higher is better)
Scoring: 32
Efficiency: 12 (lower is better)
Performance: 10 (higher is better)
DUKE - Defense
Yardage: 340 ypg allowed
Performance: 4 (higher is better)
Scoring: 18
Efficiency: 18 (higher is better)
Performance: 16 (higher is better)
Prediction:
Pure statistical: NW 17 (366 yards), DUKE 22 (336 yards)
NW best case: NW 19 (385 yards), DUKE 21 (289 yards)
DUKE best case: NW 15 (351 yards), DUKE 24 (377 yards)
NW talent: 4378
DUKE talent: 4312
NW talent of schedule: 6536
DUKE talent of schedule: 4557
Suggested talent adjustment: 10% towards NW best case
Final: NW 18 (368 yards), DUKE 22 (331 yards)
Predictor said:ORE vs GAST(+45.5)
Week 3 of 2014
ORE - Offense
Yardage: 546 ypg
Performance: 43 (higher is better)
Scoring: 46
Efficiency: 11 (lower is better)
Performance: 29 (higher is better)
ORE - Defense
Yardage: 376 ypg allowed
Performance: 7 (higher is better)
Scoring: 22
Efficiency: 16 (higher is better)
Performance: 16 (higher is better)
GAST - Offense
Yardage: 331 ypg
Performance: -14 (higher is better)
Scoring: 17
Efficiency: 18 (lower is better)
Performance: -46 (higher is better)
GAST - Defense
Yardage: 482 ypg allowed
Performance: -12 (higher is better)
Scoring: 37
Efficiency: 12 (higher is better)
Performance: -6 (higher is better)
Prediction:
Pure statistical: ORE 74 (726 yards), GAST 14 (300 yards)
ORE best case: ORE 89 (852 yards), GAST 13 (267 yards)
GAST best case: ORE 55 (611 yards), GAST 15 (326 yards)
ORE talent: 9293
GAST talent: 600
ORE talent of schedule: 5386
GAST talent of schedule: 2976
Suggested talent adjustment: 55% towards ORE best case
Final: ORE 82 (796 yards), GAST 13 (281 yards)
Predictor said:UGA vs SCAR(+16.5)
Week 3 of 2014
UGA - Offense
Yardage: 462 ypg
Performance: 26 (higher is better)
Scoring: 38
Efficiency: 12 (lower is better)
Performance: 20 (higher is better)
UGA - Defense
Yardage: 349 ypg allowed
Performance: 15 (higher is better)
Scoring: 18
Efficiency: 19 (higher is better)
Performance: 48 (higher is better)
SCAR - Offense
Yardage: 462 ypg
Performance: 40 (higher is better)
Scoring: 23
Efficiency: 20 (lower is better)
Performance: -30 (higher is better)
SCAR - Defense
Yardage: 444 ypg allowed
Performance: -14 (higher is better)
Scoring: 21
Efficiency: 20 (higher is better)
Performance: 74 (higher is better)
Prediction:
Pure statistical: UGA 25 (591 yards), SCAR 14 (479 yards)
UGA best case: UGA 33 (651 yards), SCAR 12 (394 yards)
SCAR best case: UGA 20 (529 yards), SCAR 19 (595 yards)
UGA talent: 11371
SCAR talent: 9211
UGA talent of schedule: 5972
SCAR talent of schedule: 8597
Suggested talent adjustment: 2% towards SCAR best case
Final: UGA 25 (590 yards), SCAR 14 (482 yards)
Predictor said:AUB vs LSU(-6.5)
Week 3 of 2014
AUB - Offense
Yardage: 436 ypg
Performance: 25 (higher is better)
Scoring: 29
Efficiency: 14 (lower is better)
Performance: 13 (higher is better)
AUB - Defense
Yardage: 452 ypg allowed
Performance: 0 (higher is better)
Scoring: 30
Efficiency: 14 (higher is better)
Performance: 20 (higher is better)
LSU - Offense
Yardage: 280 ypg
Performance: -25 (higher is better)
Scoring: 13
Efficiency: 20 (lower is better)
Performance: -3 (higher is better)
LSU - Defense
Yardage: 289 ypg allowed
Performance: 51 (higher is better)
Scoring: 15
Efficiency: 18 (higher is better)
Performance: 37 (higher is better)
Prediction:
Pure statistical: AUB 15 (273 yards), LSU 15 (289 yards)
AUB best case: AUB 23 (362 yards), LSU 8 (207 yards)
LSU best case: AUB 9 (199 yards), LSU 23 (338 yards)
AUB talent: 11480
LSU talent: 11816
AUB talent of schedule: 7343
LSU talent of schedule: 9800
Suggested talent adjustment: 13% towards LSU best case
Final: AUB 14 (262 yards), LSU 16 (296 yards)
Predictor said:ALA vs MISS(+6.5)
Week 3 of 2014
ALA - Offense
Yardage: 469 ypg
Performance: 36 (higher is better)
Scoring: 36
Efficiency: 13 (lower is better)
Performance: 22 (higher is better)
ALA - Defense
Yardage: 342 ypg allowed
Performance: 21 (higher is better)
Scoring: 18
Efficiency: 18 (higher is better)
Performance: 31 (higher is better)
MISS - Offense
Yardage: 549 ypg
Performance: 45 (higher is better)
Scoring: 43
Efficiency: 12 (lower is better)
Performance: 23 (higher is better)
MISS - Defense
Yardage: 326 ypg allowed
Performance: 22 (higher is better)
Scoring: 17
Efficiency: 18 (higher is better)
Performance: 17 (higher is better)
Prediction:
Pure statistical: ALA 26 (429 yards), MISS 29 (510 yards)
ALA best case: ALA 30 (535 yards), MISS 21 (425 yards)
MISS best case: ALA 21 (362 yards), MISS 34 (683 yards)
ALA talent: 14716
MISS talent: 8889
ALA talent of schedule: 6436
MISS talent of schedule: 4809
Suggested talent adjustment: 37% towards ALA best case
Final: ALA 28 (469 yards), MISS 26 (478 yards)
Predictor said:VT vs PUR(+6)
Week 3 of 2014
VT - Offense
Yardage: 371 ypg
Performance: 10 (higher is better)
Scoring: 23
Efficiency: 16 (lower is better)
Performance: -6 (higher is better)
VT - Defense
Yardage: 332 ypg allowed
Performance: 20 (higher is better)
Scoring: 19
Efficiency: 17 (higher is better)
Performance: 42 (higher is better)
PUR - Offense
Yardage: 369 ypg
Performance: -3 (higher is better)
Scoring: 21
Efficiency: 17 (lower is better)
Performance: -19 (higher is better)
PUR - Defense
Yardage: 385 ypg allowed
Performance: 2 (higher is better)
Scoring: 30
Efficiency: 12 (higher is better)
Performance: -12 (higher is better)
Prediction:
Pure statistical: VT 32 (403 yards), PUR 12 (278 yards)
VT best case: VT 40 (427 yards), PUR 9 (250 yards)
PUR best case: VT 26 (363 yards), PUR 15 (317 yards)
VT talent: 7716
PUR talent: 4559
VT talent of schedule: 5484
PUR talent of schedule: 4594
Suggested talent adjustment: 20% towards VT best case
Final: VT 33 (408 yards), PUR 11 (272 yards)
Predictor said:NEB vs MIA(-3.5)
Week 3 of 2014
NEB - Offense
Yardage: 358 ypg
Performance: 2 (higher is better)
Scoring: 28
Efficiency: 12 (lower is better)
Performance: 12 (higher is better)
NEB - Defense
Yardage: 417 ypg allowed
Performance: -5 (higher is better)
Scoring: 27
Efficiency: 15 (higher is better)
Performance: 9 (higher is better)
MIA - Offense
Yardage: 450 ypg
Performance: 20 (higher is better)
Scoring: 37
Efficiency: 12 (lower is better)
Performance: 20 (higher is better)
MIA - Defense
Yardage: 312 ypg allowed
Performance: 41 (higher is better)
Scoring: 21
Efficiency: 14 (higher is better)
Performance: 12 (higher is better)
Prediction:
Pure statistical: NEB 16 (233 yards), MIA 38 (520 yards)
NEB best case: NEB 24 (320 yards), MIA 34 (478 yards)
MIA best case: NEB 12 (189 yards), MIA 40 (573 yards)
NEB talent: 8056
MIA talent: 8588
NEB talent of schedule: 4394
MIA talent of schedule: 5587
Suggested talent adjustment: 8% towards MIA best case
Final: NEB 16 (229 yards), MIA 38 (525 yards)
Predictor said:TTU vs ARK(-11.5)
Week 3 of 2014
TTU - Offense
Yardage: 592 ypg
Performance: 50 (higher is better)
Scoring: 41
Efficiency: 14 (lower is better)
Performance: 5 (higher is better)
TTU - Defense
Yardage: 546 ypg allowed
Performance: -22 (higher is better)
Scoring: 36
Efficiency: 14 (higher is better)
Performance: 7 (higher is better)
ARK - Offense
Yardage: 344 ypg
Performance: 0 (higher is better)
Scoring: 21
Efficiency: 15 (lower is better)
Performance: 5 (higher is better)
ARK - Defense
Yardage: 291 ypg allowed
Performance: 53 (higher is better)
Scoring: 11
Efficiency: 26 (higher is better)
Performance: 84 (higher is better)
Prediction:
Pure statistical: TTU 13 (394 yards), ARK 32 (524 yards)
TTU best case: TTU 21 (577 yards), ARK 17 (416 yards)
ARK best case: TTU 6 (276 yards), ARK 46 (679 yards)
TTU talent: 6795
ARK talent: 7357
TTU talent of schedule: 5388
ARK talent of schedule: 6420
Suggested talent adjustment: 7% towards ARK best case
Final: TTU 13 (384 yards), ARK 33 (536 yards)
Predictor said:MEM vs BGSU(+3)
Week 3 of 2014
MEM - Offense
Yardage: 452 ypg
Performance: 8 (higher is better)
Scoring: 40
Efficiency: 11 (lower is better)
Performance: 23 (higher is better)
MEM - Defense
Yardage: 322 ypg allowed
Performance: 6 (higher is better)
Scoring: 14
Efficiency: 22 (higher is better)
Performance: 36 (higher is better)
BGSU - Offense
Yardage: 449 ypg
Performance: 13 (higher is better)
Scoring: 28
Efficiency: 16 (lower is better)
Performance: -8 (higher is better)
BGSU - Defense
Yardage: 445 ypg allowed
Performance: -15 (higher is better)
Scoring: 33
Efficiency: 13 (higher is better)
Performance: -2 (higher is better)
Prediction:
Pure statistical: MEM 46 (530 yards), BGSU 17 (405 yards)
MEM best case: MEM 56 (561 yards), BGSU 10 (346 yards)
BGSU best case: MEM 33 (483 yards), BGSU 25 (485 yards)
MEM talent: 3260
BGSU talent: 2532
MEM talent of schedule: 3144
BGSU talent of schedule: 3997
Suggested talent adjustment: 0% towards BGSU best case
Final: MEM 46 (529 yards), BGSU 17 (405 yards)
Predictor said:USF vs MD(-7)
Week 3 of 2014
USF - Offense
Yardage: 321 ypg
Performance: -11 (higher is better)
Scoring: 17
Efficiency: 18 (lower is better)
Performance: -26 (higher is better)
USF - Defense
Yardage: 330 ypg allowed
Performance: 30 (higher is better)
Scoring: 20
Efficiency: 15 (higher is better)
Performance: 19 (higher is better)
MD - Offense
Yardage: 339 ypg
Performance: -4 (higher is better)
Scoring: 28
Efficiency: 11 (lower is better)
Performance: 16 (higher is better)
MD - Defense
Yardage: 418 ypg allowed
Performance: -13 (higher is better)
Scoring: 30
Efficiency: 13 (higher is better)
Performance: -1 (higher is better)
Prediction:
Pure statistical: USF 23 (372 yards), MD 17 (244 yards)
USF best case: USF 30 (426 yards), MD 13 (214 yards)
MD best case: USF 17 (328 yards), MD 23 (314 yards)
USF talent: 5138
MD talent: 5801
USF talent of schedule: 4476
MD talent of schedule: 5328
Suggested talent adjustment: 7% towards MD best case
Final: USF 22 (369 yards), MD 17 (249 yards)
Predictor said:FLA vs UK(+3)
Week 3 of 2014
FLA - Offense
Yardage: 392 ypg
Performance: -1 (higher is better)
Scoring: 36
Efficiency: 10 (lower is better)
Performance: 27 (higher is better)
FLA - Defense
Yardage: 304 ypg allowed
Performance: 46 (higher is better)
Scoring: 14
Efficiency: 20 (higher is better)
Performance: 39 (higher is better)
UK - Offense
Yardage: 342 ypg
Performance: -8 (higher is better)
Scoring: 27
Efficiency: 12 (lower is better)
Performance: 25 (higher is better)
UK - Defense
Yardage: 475 ypg allowed
Performance: -11 (higher is better)
Scoring: 38
Efficiency: 12 (higher is better)
Performance: -11 (higher is better)
Prediction:
Pure statistical: FLA 51 (465 yards), UK 14 (202 yards)
FLA best case: FLA 73 (523 yards), UK 9 (146 yards)
UK best case: FLA 33 (432 yards), UK 20 (286 yards)
FLA talent: 11297
UK talent: 6033
FLA talent of schedule: 6224
UK talent of schedule: 6194
Suggested talent adjustment: 26% towards FLA best case
Final: FLA 57 (480 yards), UK 13 (187 yards)
BYU vs UCLA(-17)
Week 3 of 2015
BYU - Offense
Yardage: 474 ypg
Performance: 12 (higher is better)
Scoring: 40
Efficiency: 11 (lower is better)
Performance: 15 (higher is better)
BYU - Defense
Yardage: 336 ypg allowed
Performance: 25 (higher is better)
Scoring: 19
Efficiency: 17 (higher is better)
Performance: 33 (higher is better)
UCLA - Offense
Yardage: 432 ypg
Performance: 5 (higher is better)
Scoring: 30
Efficiency: 14 (lower is better)
Performance: 11 (higher is better)
UCLA - Defense
Yardage: 322 ypg allowed
Performance: 31 (higher is better)
Scoring: 17
Efficiency: 18 (higher is better)
Performance: 32 (higher is better)
Prediction:
Pure statistical: BYU 18 (336 yards), UCLA 17 (322 yards)
BYU best case: BYU 23 (392 yards), UCLA 12 (269 yards)
UCLA best case: BYU 12 (263 yards), UCLA 23 (356 yards)
BYU talent: 4102
UCLA talent: 9043
BYU talent of schedule: 4163
UCLA talent of schedule: 7235
Suggested talent adjustment: 40% towards UCLA best case
Final: BYU 16 (307 yards), UCLA 19 (336 yards)
This one is more than 100% more valid.
Our lone loss is to Clemson who beats us 16 to 11.
What do you make of the FLA prediction?
Also, is that Louisiana Tech and Colorado State?
Seems like it's getting less accurate based on the fcs opener results than just simply using last year's data.
week 4?
The weekly game preview and the predictor will be back tomorrow. A combination of wounded butt, car problems, and a double workload this week have kept me from doing anything football related.
I'll do better next time, etc.
BTW I am straight.
BTW I am straight.
BTW I am straight.
The weekly game preview and the predictor will be back tomorrow. A combination of wounded butt, car problems, and a double workload this week have kept me from doing anything football related.
I'll do better next time, etc.
BTW I am straight.
The weekly game preview and the predictor will be back tomorrow. A combination of wounded butt, car problems, and a double workload this week have kept me from doing anything football related.
I'll do better next time, etc.
BTW I am straight.