Reminder: Vote Romney

My parents got one of these calls at their house, but from the Obama campaign. I think those people need better calling sheets; making pitches to registered Republicans probably isn't going to bear much fruit.

One I could live with. Two I could understand. But four? And they were pretty much evenly spaced at 2 hours.

It didn't work. I voted for McCain.
 
GREAT GAWD AWMIGHTY! I drop all kinds of ripe political bait tryin' to git some dialog going on the off topics forum and then I come here and there's a 4 page political thread on the freakin' football forum!


Consider dropping in on this thread:

http://www.stingtalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=24954

Where Geeteelee equates all liberals to Hitler, going strait for Godwin's Law in the top post.


Beej. Please.

I did no such thing. I quoted from and linked to the Amazon review of the book.

Besides that, neither the reviewer nor the author claims anything remotely like that. The point of the book is liberalism is far more facist in its actions than are conservatives, even though calling conservatives "Nazis" has been du rigor for the netroots crowd.

Please don't put words in my mouth. The ol' fogster has pretty much stuffed it full.
 
1. I never said what I believe just giving the definition

2. Do some research and look up the word in the dictionary

Definition (link)

1.a particular personage or power, variously identified or explained, who is conceived of as appearing in the world as the principal antagonist of Christ. 2.(sometimes lowercase
thinsp.png
) an opponent of Christ; a person or power antagonistic to Christ. 3.(often lowercase
thinsp.png
) a disbeliever in Christ.
4.(often lowercase
thinsp.png
) a false Christ.

If you want to believe im an idiot for givin a correct definition(according to the dictionary) then go ahead but to say that Jesus is the antichrist is even more stupid than anything i said. What he isn't going to believe in himself? I never said that Jews or anybody else is the antichrist because i have no idea what they believe. Just saying that disbelievers in christ can be called antichrist which is not saying they are the Antichrist.

and if you look up "maggot" it will tell you its a bundle of sticks, does that make it right? no

also, you are pointing at a 4th definition which is wrong on its face, as any idiot can tell that ANTI is latin for AGAINST so unless not believing iin Christ makes you AGAINST Christ, which is NOT a logical conclusion, then the definition is OBVIOUSLY false and clearly another Christian way to demonize "non believers" as infidels worthy of death

by the way, the Christian "god" was assumed from Judaism, just ask Jesus, who was a Jew (and never converted). most of his teachings have been shown to come from the Essene (sp?) Jewish sect from when came the Dead Sea scrolls, which have been shown to contain many of the teachings that Jesus espoused after returning from parts unknown
 
This is the liberal way. Next thing people will try and convince you that the holocaust didn't exist. Definetly not a laughing matter.

i agree that its no laughing matter, but to say that this is the "liberal way" wtf are you talking about. the american nazis were all ultra conservative businessmen, now they are right-wing Xenophobes, liberal has very little to do with it. in fact, most Jews tend to be more "liberal" voting than "conservative". it is the ultra-conservatives that want to maintain "values" like whiteness and christiandom as key principals of the US, and other right-wingers like the Freedom parties of Europe (like our Libertarian party) who are full of neo-nazis. And further right-wingers like Iran's president who deny the Holocaust.

your comment is antithetic and plain false
 
and if you look up "maggot" it will tell you its a bundle of sticks, does that make it right? no

also, you are pointing at a 4th definition which is wrong on its face, as any idiot can tell that ANTI is latin for AGAINST so unless not believing iin Christ makes you AGAINST Christ, which is NOT a logical conclusion, then the definition is OBVIOUSLY false and clearly another Christian way to demonize "non believers" as infidels worthy of death

by the way, the Christian "god" was assumed from Judaism, just ask Jesus, who was a Jew (and never converted). most of his teachings have been shown to come from the Essene (sp?) Jewish sect from when came the Dead Sea scrolls, which have been shown to contain many of the teachings that Jesus espoused after returning from parts unknown
I never said what religion I was or what I believe your just assuming and im not trying to demonize anybody. My sociology professor pointed this out to my class one day and it has stuck in my brain since and i figured i would share while people were talking about it. Take it how you want bro but im not trying to demoralize or demonize anyone.
 
Psychopaths for PAUL!!

I LOVE LOW TAXES, NOT HAVING MY MONEY DESTROYED BY A FAULTY NON-GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATION, A STABLE FOREIGN POLICY, AND CAN THINK OUTSIDE OF WHAT THE NEWS TELLS ME TO THINK!

I AM ABSOF***INGLUTELY CRAZY!!!
 
Define God. You seem to imply "Christian God," to which I reply Jews can get elected just fine.

I sincerely doubt that. But then again, I also doubted that a black man could ever get elected and certainly no one can deny that Obama is a candidate with a serious chance of winning...but there's a lot more black people in this country than Jews.
 
I voted for who I thought would give use the highest body count of muslim extremists...
 
I sincerely doubt that. But then again, I also doubted that a black man could ever get elected and certainly no one can deny that Obama is a candidate with a serious chance of winning...but there's a lot more black people in this country than Jews.

Jews are also only about 1 percent of the population.

It's amazing really the amount of power and wealth they have. No, I'm NOT peddling some Zionist conspiracy theory. I'm just crediting them for their intelligence and hard work.

Joe Lieberman was also a few votes in Ohio away from being Vice President.
 
If anyone's watching the coverage and is wondering why Georgia hasn't been called yet, it's because of the metro area. Only about 1/7 of Fulton county precincts have reported in so far, and Huckabee is running fairly well behind Romney and McCain in Fulton. He's also 3rd in DeKalb and Cobb, and second in Gwinnett. Those last three counties have reported about 2/3 - 3/4 of their totals; most of the rest of Georgia appears to have reported nearly 90-100% of their totals.

Just some amateur analysis there for you. Trying to add some substance to this thread.

EDIT: Should probably cite my source, the Secretary of State's office. http://sos.georgia.gov/elections/election_results/2008_0205/00101.htm

The count was about 70% when I posted, it will obviously be constantly updating as time goes by; the networks are running about 10% ahead of this count.

EDIT 2: Oh f--k you Fox. So I guess it's Huckabee after all. I mean seriously, I worked at this post and then you go and ruin it for me like 5 minutes later.
 
the road to serfdom

If any of you actually want to read a legit book on how we arrive at totalitarian governments, pick up F.A. Hayek's Road to Serfdom (central planning leads to fascism).

If you want to understand what a free society looks like, read Nozick, Friedman, and Hayek until you can rip Rawls vision to shreds. Those folks are legit. Unlike some of the books/folks mentioned above.

Until then, for the first time, I hope visitors don't see this thread. It's an embarrassment.

p.s. If you are obsessed with the rapture/antichrist/etc you have serious issues. It's hard enough to try to follow Jesus without taking up the 19th century interpretations of the "rapture." The Jehovah's Witnesses are ready when you are.
 
Re: the road to serfdom

If you want to understand what a free society looks like, read Nozick, Friedman, and Hayek until you can rip Rawls vision to shreds.
Rawls is a bona-fide moron; his "veil of ignorance" argument is pure socialist garbage.
 
Back
Top