GTROY
Damn Good Rat
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2005
- Messages
- 1,296
Well, that's the point. You may hate to hear it but it is reality.
BC or Wake can have the same record and yet not get the same attention for the conference. And if our conference gets positive attention then that is good for us.
I'd hate to win the ACC and have it mean as much as winning Conference USA. We need the perception of the ACC to be better because the polls determine the BCS order and the polls are all perception.
The media doesn't think the ACC is any good unless one of those key programs is good. They'll overlook the bottom feeders in a conference as long as it has a few top programs that they recognize and perceive as quality.
It takes YEARS of great performance to change perceptions and think of a program as a top program. But once you have that perception it also takes years to lose it. If UVA or Duke has a great year, then it will be an oddity. If FSU has that same year then it gets much more attention.
I want GT to do well, obviously. But it will be better for us (in the eyes of the voting press and coaches) if we do well against an FSU team that is strong than if we do well against a barely bowl eligible FSU.
Unfair? You bet!
But, until we have a playoff, perception is critical to the success of the program. And we haven't been good enough long enough to carry our own cachet.
I've got an idea. How about we just concentrate on winning and not worry about how good the other teams are?