Season Ticket Holder Locations

GTROY said:
Front row of Swarm, right behind the T in TECH. Ah, it'll be my last season as a student.

The way I see it, I'm paying $25,000 a year for front row tickets to football games and floor seats to bball games.
Click to expand...

YEAH BUDDY, LIGHTWEIGHT.

EVERYBODY WANNA BE A TECH FAN, BUT DON'T NOBODY WANNA PAY THESE HEAVY ASS FEES.

I'LL DO ITTTTTT. BOOOOOOOOO.

reference for 99% of you:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hxa_kj2aBCU
 
thwg said:
I bought 4 this seaosn instead of 8 so there are 4 good seats on 35YL LW if anyone wants them. My cost went down significantly and I fugure I'll just scalp if I need more tickets. Unfortunately, GTAA, makes less but I couldn't justify the cost as this point in this economy.
Click to expand...

I'm usually slow, so I ask your patience in advance, but just exactly how does GTAA make less because you bought 4 less tickets on the 35 yard line?
 
Vespid said:
I'm usually slow, so I ask your patience in advance, but just exactly how does GTAA make less because you bought 4 less tickets on the 35 yard line?
Click to expand...

Because season tickets are not sold out.
 
GTKyle said:
Because season tickets are not sold out.
Click to expand...

Well, I would be willing to bet those four seats in the Tech Fund area 35 yard line lower west got gobbled up pretty quick as soon as the deadline passed. So somebody else will pay the seat licensing fee he didn't pay and buy the four seats he didn't buy. So that's a net zero. He said he will buy four others when needed from scalpers, thus supporting even more tix sales as a second party purchaser. We already have sold more full season tix than the last non uga home game season, so looks like a net win for GTAA to me. :grin:
 
Vespid said:
Well, I would be willing to bet those four seats in the Tech Fund area 35 yard line lower west got gobbled up pretty quick as soon as the deadline passed. So somebody else will pay the seat licensing fee he didn't pay and buy the four seats he didn't buy. So that's a net zero. He said he will buy four others when needed from scalpers, thus supporting even more tix sales as a second party purchaser. We already have sold more full season tix than the last non uga home game season, so looks like a net win for GTAA to me. :grin:
Click to expand...
Yeah but

4 tickets paid for > 4 tickets that may be paid for
 
Vespid said:
Well, I would be willing to bet those four seats in the Tech Fund area 35 yard line lower west got gobbled up pretty quick as soon as the deadline passed. So somebody else will pay the seat licensing fee he didn't pay and buy the four seats he didn't buy. So that's a net zero. He said he will buy four others when needed from scalpers, thus supporting even more tix sales as a second party purchaser. We already have sold more full season tix than the last non uga home game season, so looks like a net win for GTAA to me. :grin:
Click to expand...

You are assuming that the 4 unpurchased seats will be purchased by a person who previously did not have season tickets. If this is the case then it is a net zero.

However, if the person who purchases these seats moves from another location then there is a hole where their seats were. Assuming then someone moves up to fill their seats then there is another hole.

The only way this comes out to a zero sum is if we have one new season ticketholder that replaces the seats of the last person to move up.
 
mts315 said:
You are assuming that the 4 unpurchased seats will be purchased by a person who previously did not have season tickets. If this is the case then it is a net zero.

However, if the person who purchases these seats moves from another location then there is a hole where their seats were. Assuming then someone moves up to fill their seats then there is another hole.

The only way this comes out to a zero sum is if we have one new season ticketholder that replaces the seats of the last person to move up.
Click to expand...

you are also making assumptions, such as that all the people would pay the same amount. Say person A used to buy the seats, but now gave them up. another person purchases the seats, but this person, person B, cares more than person A about WHERE in the section he sits and thus gives money to the AT Fund to get his points up. Thereby, GTAA would get increased revenue from those 4 seats, even though it is "net zero" on the total number of sold seats (assuming your assumptions to be the case).

it is more complex than simply number of seats, because there is the variable option to pay to AT Fund to get higher priority within the different sections
 
Finally got my Jackets Nest tickets today. I think I put it off for too long though. All I could manage is section 210. It doesn't appear to be great seats but for $150 a piece I'll still take it. Anyone know how the view is from 210? Row 13 I believe.
 
BuzzCzar said:
you are also making assumptions, such as that all the people would pay the same amount. Say person A used to buy the seats, but now gave them up. another person purchases the seats, but this person, person B, cares more than person A about WHERE in the section he sits and thus gives money to the AT Fund to get his points up. Thereby, GTAA would get increased revenue from those 4 seats, even though it is "net zero" on the total number of sold seats (assuming your assumptions to be the case).

it is more complex than simply number of seats, because there is the variable option to pay to AT Fund to get higher priority within the different sections
Click to expand...

I thought AT points didn't matter for season tickets anymore?
 
Someone on the Hive a little while back actually wrote an excel spreadsheet that could tell you how good your seats were, based on trigonometry.

I wish I still had that link.
 
Section 227. I'm partly inebriated and don't remember my row, but I'd be glad to meet some of you guys this year.
 
Section 215, Row 12

Sounds like they need to rename the Jacket's Nest to the StingTalk Nest.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top