I heard from a VERY reliable source
that when the Peach negotiated with the ACC to become the league's 2nd Bowl (behind the BCS), a handshake agreement was made that the Peach would take the ACCCG loser as long as the CG was in Jax. That's not in writing anywhere, but I know that a gentlemen's agreement on this matter was reached before the ACC agreed to elevate the Peach Bowl's status. Sooooo, the real villain in the piece is our hometown bowl which wants the Dawggies and therefore does not want us, and certainly doesn't want Wake because of ticket sales issues. And I wouldn't be surprised to see the Gator Bowl folks spill the beans about this sidebar deal if the ACC forces them to take the loser...
pocket_watch said:In defense of the Gator Bowl, the cg loser is supposed to go to the Peach, while the winner of course goes on to the OB.
Either the Peach or the league is to blame. If the ACC had more nerve, they would coerce the Peach to take the league runner up at all costs.
I don't blame the Gator Bowl.
that when the Peach negotiated with the ACC to become the league's 2nd Bowl (behind the BCS), a handshake agreement was made that the Peach would take the ACCCG loser as long as the CG was in Jax. That's not in writing anywhere, but I know that a gentlemen's agreement on this matter was reached before the ACC agreed to elevate the Peach Bowl's status. Sooooo, the real villain in the piece is our hometown bowl which wants the Dawggies and therefore does not want us, and certainly doesn't want Wake because of ticket sales issues. And I wouldn't be surprised to see the Gator Bowl folks spill the beans about this sidebar deal if the ACC forces them to take the loser...