southendzoneBEE
Gailey-Like
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2009
- Messages
- 13,579
In all seriousness Taquan should be an aback and Oliver our qb.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It seems like a big deal to me that TO (apparently) can't throw the ball as well as TQM. We really need to complete those wide open 3d and 8 passes to be a competitive offense again.In all seriousness Taquan should be an aback and Oliver our qb.
Well if this is indeed true, we are ****ed at the QB position.It seems like a big deal to me that TO (apparently) can't throw the ball as well as TQM
Well if this is indeed true, we are ****ed at the QB position.
Know I do like the gifs of the plays you make. This one is perfect to show TM panicking and not trusting the blocking and play call.The forced pitch is so important. JT would force the pitch.
TQM made a lot of good pitches in the Pitt game. But football is a game of inches and GT needs every right read and perfect play it can get.
The big issue is when the defenders shoulders are pointed at the Aback but near the QB? Charge the defender and make him choose you or the ABack. Hopefully he will choose the QB as the pitch is money more often than the QB. Also, this puts the QB running in the right direction. There is nothing behind the QB but big hugging arms that want to give you a bear squeeze. Here is an example of where the force pitch is needed.
TQM needs to work through the hesitancy on "tight" pitches and forcing pitches. He should be looking to pitch... unless a 1st down is right there...
I'll get Taquon a job at my company upon graduation if he stops playing right now.
Would benefit the school more if you could get CPJ on board and away from GT instead.
I'm talking about a 50K entry level job for a Tech management alumnus. Not picking up CPJ's 3 million dollar salary.
And by the way, if you're only making $80k per year, you're a disgrace to your GT degree.
He looks like he was determined to run at the snap
CPJ had it on the playsheet but he left that back in the hotel room because he didn't want to cheat the announcers out of being able to say "Paul Johnson doesn't carry a playsheet".If you watch the the first video, the chasing end is totally set up for an end around. Do we even still do this anymore? I swear our playbook shrinks every year.
This isn't a triple option. The backside Aback is blocking inside out on the corner and the pitch goes to the BBack. If TM charges and options off the read key #40, then the pitch goes to Mason and #40 is out of the play. The playside Aback may have gotten enough of his linebacker for this to be a decent play - not sure if this one goes big even with a pitch. Mason would have had to run right behind Cottrell and beat the chipped linebacker plus whatever safety depending on the WR blocking. That said, 5 yards and operating the offense on schedule is a big difference than 1 clumsy yard.While I agree that TQM hasn’t displayed the ability to throw that really late pitch that JT5 did (sometimes you thought the play was over only to see the ball flying out of the defenders body), it doesn’t appear that the pitch was on the table in this play.
The A back is never looking for the pitch. He has his back to Marshall all the time. I guess we could have pitched it to the B back but #40 would have easily tackled him for a loss.
This looks like a designed play to me, with a hole being created down the middle for TM to use his speed. Unfortunately, it appears that the left tackle (73?) is unable to do anything to his man (and I think also gets onto the wrong side of him) which forces TM to go farther in the wrong direction giving the non play side LB who is basically lined up at the LOS enough time to come around and tackle him from the side.
It was thread where the LT kept floundering.This isn't a triple option. The backside Aback is blocking inside out on the corner and the pitch goes to the BBack. If TM charges and options off the read key #40, then the pitch goes to Mason and #40 is out of the play. The playside Aback may have gotten enough of his linebacker for this to be a decent play - not sure if this one goes big even with a pitch. Mason would have had to run right behind Cottrell and beat the chipped linebacker plus whatever safety depending on the WR blocking. That said, 5 yards and operating the offense on schedule is a big difference than 1 clumsy yard.
Not sure why people are busting on the left tackle. He owned his man, almost to the ground, and got leverage so when that play goes to the outside, his man is locked up. Their #40 is unblocked on purpose as he is the read.
What I see:
RT gets his man on a cut
RG doesn't get to the LB
C gets held up by the DT
LG slow off the snap, but was in position to block the LB that the RG couldn't get to - but the play went back inside.
LT gets his guy
ABack Cottrell gets his guy
ABack playside gets enough of his guy
Bback had good pitch relationship
WR - out of screen
IMO, this is what CPJ means by we need to be almost perfect. Everyone did a well enough job on this play for a decent gain, but no pitch means crap play.