The hedges see him coming

coit said:
I think to call UGA's loss a meltdown is a severe overreaction. Both teams showed the ability to strike back, and both teams showed the ability to get some stops today. UGA scored 5 times, we scored 4 times. It just so happens that we got more TDs. Paul made some gutsy calls today. Some worked, and some didn't.

Anyone that tries to place blame on any single player or coach is a ööööing idiot.
Click to expand...

they had a 13-pt lead and were running at will

then they failed on multiple drives to go anywhere, gave up big plays against us, and then they threw an interception to give us a chance.

kinda seems like a meltdown. a guy that came from Saban's 'organization is everything' approach might have learned something from him of that nature, but Smart has not shown all year any great ability to do so

they gave the game away, from their point of view
 
coit said:
Running at will? Did you even read the list of 10 consecutive runs with a 2.8 ypc average I posted?
Click to expand...

you probably should have kept reading before responding

also, i realize that you are really old; but to the rest of us, we still acknowledge the passage of time. thus, the "were running at will" and then they "failed on multiple drives to go anywhere"

perhaps you disagree that 6.3 yards per rush is not "running at will" (that figure includes your limited subset of selected plays)
perhaps you dont think that having 19 carries for 170 yards by one of your RBs is indicative of a good runing game
perhaps you disagree that having a 10-min advantage in time of possession infers a good running game
but if you do, i would have to say that you are a dumbass
 
BuzzCzar said:
you probably should have kept reading before responding

also, i realize that you are really old; but to the rest of us, we still acknowledge the passage of time. thus, the "were running at will" and then they "failed on multiple drives to go anywhere"

perhaps you disagree that 6.3 yards per rush is not "running at will" (that figure includes your limited subset of selected plays)
perhaps you dont think that having 19 carries for 170 yards by one of your RBs is indicative of a good runing game
perhaps you disagree that having a 10-min advantage in time of possession infers a good running game
but if you do, i would have to say that you are a dumbass
Click to expand...

I'm talking about the previous 10 rushing plays up to that point. Doesn't matter what happened earlier in the game. They were in a clear rushing situation. We knew that they were in a clear rushing situation. We stopped them. OC chose to do something different. Game theory. Not that hard to understand for most people.
 
coit said:
I'm talking about the previous 10 rushing plays up to that point. Doesn't matter what happened earlier in the game. They were in a clear rushing situation. We knew that they were in a clear rushing situation. We stopped them. OC chose to do something different. Game theory. Not that hard to understand for most people.
Click to expand...

it doesnt matter what happened before? only the last 10 plays mattered? wtf are you talking about? thats just plain stupid talk

also, you are ignoring the bigger picture, they didnt need to score. they didnt even need to get a first down, necessarily. if Gailey was their coach, they would have won that game, because he would have run it again and again or punted it deep.

they threw it and it got intercepted, when a turnover was the one thing that they had to avoid

game theory over

they outSmarted themselves, not us
 
southendzoneBEE said:
Still not a good call, with the lead, on 2nd down. Throw it on third down. But at the end of the day, Jesus Eason wasn't able to hit a wide open man.
Click to expand...

We got a break when Nauta was wide open on the final series and couldn't bring in that catch.
 
BuzzCzar said:
it doesnt matter what happened before? only the last 10 plays mattered? wtf are you talking about? thats just plain stupid talk

also, you are ignoring the bigger picture, they didnt need to score. they didnt even need to get a first down, necessarily. if Gailey was their coach, they would have won that game, because he would have run it again and again or punted it deep.

they threw it and it got intercepted, when a turnover was the one thing that they had to avoid

game theory over

they outSmarted themselves, not us
Click to expand...

For someone that claims to have played football you sure don't know very much. You think UGA is going to run the same plays with a lead late in the game that they are gonna run early on? You dumb.
 
swampsting said:
We got a break when Nauta was wide open on the final series and couldn't bring in that catch.
Click to expand...

He should have brought it in but it was also a bad throw -- he had to turn around to try to catch it.
 
coit said:
I think to call UGA's loss a meltdown is a severe overreaction. Both teams showed the ability to strike back, and both teams showed the ability to get some stops today. UGA scored 5 times, we scored 4 times. It just so happens that we got more TDs. Paul made some gutsy calls today. Some worked, and some didn't.

Anyone that tries to place blame on any single player or coach is a ööööing idiot.
Click to expand...

He was making fun of the dawgnation when he said "meltdown." Pull up an Uncle Lou vid.

Bark listed a number of things that Georgia should never do... as seen by the run of the mill dawg fan who then watches his team fail to live up to their preconceptions time and time again.
 
coit said:
No offense, but you know less than he does from my recollection.

I suggest you start a poll. I predict I will win. Just like I did in the fire Roof poll.
Click to expand...

giphy.gif
 
BuzzCzar said:
they had a 13-pt lead and were running at will

then they failed on multiple drives to go anywhere, gave up big plays against us, and then they threw an interception to give us a chance.

kinda seems like a meltdown. a guy that came from Saban's 'organization is everything' approach might have learned something from him of that nature, but Smart has not shown all year any great ability to do so

they gave the game away, from their point of view
Click to expand...

They do feel that way, I'm sure. It's all about timing, because when you think about it, we also failed on multiple drives to go anywhere, gave up big plays to them, and fumbled to start the half. Was really a very even game.
 
coit said:
For someone that claims to have played football you sure don't know very much. You think UGA is going to run the same plays with a lead late in the game that they are gonna run early on? You dumb.
Click to expand...

Why would they have to run the "same plays"? and why wouldnt they? we run many times the same plays over and over when they are working

Anyway, the point is that they should have kept running to keep the clock moving and to decrease the risk of a turnover. i think you are the dumb one if you dont see that with less than 2min to go in the game with a 6pt lead

If you wanna pass it, just throw it to the WR on the edge right on the line to play it safe, or run a pass play where a drop is an incomplete and not a pick

Im sure i played more football than you ever did, but that doesnt really have an impact on logic.

Feel free to have your opinion but calling others dumb just because they dont share your perspective is what is dumb
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top