Transition from Option running team to pass first team...

Discussion in 'Football' started by Walton, Sep 16, 2019.

  1. THWG247

    THWG247 Varsity Lurker

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2015
    Messages:
    245
    Loc:
    Temple, GA
    Team:
    Georgia Tech
    Bill Callahan took over at Nebraska
     
  2. gtchief

    gtchief ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2015
    Messages:
    2,187
    Loc:
    Alpharetta
    Team:
    GT
    I think the ineptitude after the first quarter was enough to shut down any lofty notions of trying something different this year. I mean what could be a more obvious message than what you're calling isn't even working against an FCS team? What the hell were the coaches seeing in practice to think the passing playbook was even on the table? Does the defense not go full speed in practice and leave guys open? No stopwatch to let a guy know when he'd be sacked?

    My biggest fear is that the coaches know we can't execute the passing packages but the alternative is a run game that can't gain yards without cut blocking and triple option formations.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  3. BigDanT

    BigDanT Actually John Goodman

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2015
    Messages:
    2,503
    Loc:
    Lawrenceville
    Team:
    Yellow jackets
    That’s exactly true. They are trying to display what the offense will be for recruits. If we had 1 QB that could do it all he would be out there the whole time.

    It’s all about recruiting. This really is year 0
     
  4. gtchief

    gtchief ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2015
    Messages:
    2,187
    Loc:
    Alpharetta
    Team:
    GT
    It isn't about one guy being able to do everything. The only things that worked were some QB scrambles and some pitches, neither of which is part of the new look. We can't even display a semblance of an offense against an FCS team. Our OL couldn't open up holes against an FCS front even if we wanted to run every down, and the passing was laterals for two yard losses and incompletions to FCS - smothered tight ends. We had a nice jump ball for the long touchdown pass where our guy was turned around in the end zone waiting for it, but we had that over the past 11 years.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  5. WracerX

    WracerX Dr. Dunkingstein

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2004
    Messages:
    14,813
    Loc:
    Somewhere in the early 80's
    Team:
    GT
    Oops. My memory was off. But they definitely went from option to west coast, which is a complete mismatch for the personnel.
     
    • Dislike Dislike x 1
  6. WracerX

    WracerX Dr. Dunkingstein

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2004
    Messages:
    14,813
    Loc:
    Somewhere in the early 80's
    Team:
    GT
    I don’t know. The plays Oliver was running were plays Temple used. I’m not sure I want a recruit who isn’t smart enough to see we are using what we have.
     
  7. ibeattetris

    ibeattetris Varsity Lurker

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2011
    Messages:
    266
    Loc:
    Seattle
    Team:
    Georgia Tech
    After the coaches repeatedly talked about suiting the offense to the personnel I assumed an offense based around Malzahn's concepts was a no brainer. It gets to shotgun which Patenaude seems to prefer but still allows us to take advantage of the minor strengths our team had.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  8. Tampa Jacket

    Tampa Jacket Varsity Lurker

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2018
    Messages:
    248
    Loc:
    Tampa
    Team:
    Georgia Tech
    better players and recruiting classes that finish closer to 25 than 125 is the key
     
    • Like Like x 3
    • Dislike Dislike x 1
  9. THWG247

    THWG247 Varsity Lurker

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2015
    Messages:
    245
    Loc:
    Temple, GA
    Team:
    Georgia Tech
    Yep and i think they did finish like 8-7 or something, but he mostly aborted the West Coast passing game at some point in the season and went run heavy.
     
  10. Olgoldandwhie

    Olgoldandwhie Varsity Lurker

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2019
    Messages:
    150
    Loc:
    McRae, GA
    Team:
    Georgia Tech
    You are correct, Sir!