ah, ok. I didn't see that timeline and other facts. That's pretty bad, but at the same time (CONJECTURE), he could technically say the violation was "impossible" because he talked to the players and they said it wasn't true...he took there word that the possible violation was rendered impossible...just another guess feel free to correct it, I don't really care, but apparently bearing people's faults on the internet is something that gets you off. I like to give the benefit of the doubt where possible. And in a case that really is very insignificant...(~$5000 of tatoo services and payment for memorabilia...maybe $10,000 don't want to get google policed again)...I really don't think it's a huge deal. Not to mention that perhaps a misunderstanding of the rules really was at fault. They said their compliance office needs work too. Maybe they weren't sure that selling memorabilia like trophies wasn't allowed. They weren't university sponsored items. They were trophies. Can a player never sell his trophy? I guess the obvious response is just not while he's a player, but my comeback to that is, but he can never sell his jersey because it's the university's, not because he's receiving benefits for his playing...a trophy is technically his...