gth816f
Dodd-Like
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2006
- Messages
- 12,766
Someone help me understand the "money" argument. Assuming an 8-team playoff, you have 4 1st round games, 2 semifinals and a championship game for a total of 7 games vs. 5 BCS bowl games under the current system. Seven games will generate more television revenue than 5 - the networks will buy it.
Now, if you want to tell me there's reduced revenue because most fans aren't going to be able to drop everything 3 weeks IAR (actually, 2 since you'll have a month or so to plan for the 1st round game) to follow a team through the playoffs, I'll grant you that. But most of the revenue is driven by the TV contracts.
From what I know, bowls are all non profit events put on by the city, so they make no money from TV contracts. The money is made from the influx of cash and tourists into the cities. So many people make long vacations out of these games, especially bowls like the Rose Bowl or the Sugar Bowl. Not only would the short notice hurt this, but the time and the expense factor would undoubtedly kill this. Most people will splurge on one vacation, figuring it's a relatively unique opportunity. Most people can't do that four times in a row. That probably wouldn't be as much as a problem with a four team model. You could stage the first round at home stadiums, but that leaves a couple BCS bowls out in the cold with bad and meaningless matchups.