i see things havent changed that much

Xihix said:
fraternities are safe havens for sexual assault, rape and racism. white people who involve themselves in them are gross. i honestly do believe the benefits they claim of them (networking, philanthropy, etc.) is just a giant cover up for the mentioned things they do. evil öööös
Click to expand...

dumbass post

by an overwhelming margin at Georgia Tech the #1 reason why people joined fraternities was that it provided a support structure to help you academically, especially with WORD

Greek mens GPA average was always higher than non-Greek. AEPi and Betas were always 1 & 2, not necessarily in that order
 
TechPhi97 said:
So the IFC, which has to report to the Dean of Students or whomever, keeps a copy of the charter for each fraternity that specifically calls out discrimination. Nobody from that office says anything about it, it never gets brought up, and yet you're able to track down this information while hammered in the middle of the night?

Seems 100% true.

I was in a fraternity, I would say there were racist members and not racist members. To me the percentages were similar to what I saw on campus both inside and outside other fraternities, although I think some of the houses had a higher concentration of racism.
Click to expand...

it was more convoluted than that, but i am not going to detail it because i am only willing to admit to the misdeeds that i performed, and not detail the possible ethical or legal violations of others
 
Xihix said:
college athletics are safe havens for sexual assault, rape and racism. people who involve themselves in them are gross. i honestly do believe the benefits they claim of them (networking, philanthropy, school pride) is just a giant cover up for the mentioned things they do. evil öööös
Click to expand...

Let me fix that for you...

Seriously, sexual assault is an issue specifically at fraternities, but sports is the same type of club. You're pretty much gross for participating.
 
BuzzCzar said:
it was more convoluted than that, but i am not going to detail it because i am only willing to admit to the misdeeds that i performed, and not detail the possible ethical or legal violations of others
Click to expand...

Well that's a fantastic way to make a claim, assert proof, and then not have to actually produce the proof. :lol:

Seriously, I'm in part messing with you but in part not believing you. you don't need to convince me that there are racists in fraternities at Georgia Tech, or that there is pressure not to admit black students into white fraternities.
 
TechPhi97 said:
Let me fix that for you...

Seriously, sexual assault is an issue specifically at fraternities, but sports is the same type of club. You're pretty much gross for participating.
Click to expand...

My biggest issue is why wont the sororities ever sexually assault us guys? I mean seriously, fair and balanced please!
 
i am fine with you not believing me, but you might realize that there was a vested interest on the part of AEPi to discover which fraternities on campus had an active anti-semitic policy. #TechMossad
 
BuzzCzar said:
i am fine with you not believing me, but you might realize that there was a vested interest on the part of AEPi to discover which fraternities on campus had an active anti-semitic policy. #TechMossad
Click to expand...


As I have previously mentioned, we loved that jewish pizza!
 
Xihix said:
the internets are safe havens for sexual assault, stupidity and racism. white people who involve themselves in them are gross. i honestly do believe the benefits they claim of them (networking, philanthropy, etc.) is just a giant cover up for the mentioned things they do. evilshits
Click to expand...
ftfy
 
BuzzCzar said:
i am fine with you not believing me, but you might realize that there was a vested interest on the part of AEPi to discover which fraternities on campus had an active anti-semitic policy. #TechMossad
Click to expand...

That just backs up what I'm saying - if it was in a charter that you all had access to and knowledge of, and you have a vested interest in weeding out discriminatory behavior, why was no action taken? And publicly, at that.

Serious question - does AEPi take into account a members religion during the rush process?
 
TechPhi97 said:
That just backs up what I'm saying - if it was in a charter that you all had access to and knowledge of, and you have a vested interest in weeding out discriminatory behavior, why was no action taken? And publicly, at that.

Serious question - does AEPi take into account a members religion during the rush process?
Click to expand...

re: first paragraph- we wanted to find out, but it was illegal to do what we had to do to find out. and it would have meant likely expulsion for one of our members. why would we force any action to be taken? we were not trying to get them kicked off campus, we just wanted to know. we saw it as a vested interest in determining facts so that we could properly interpret the actions and statement of other groups, not to get them in trouble. or ourselves in trouble

re: second paragraph- that changed over time depending on the brothers. it was often debated before the rush process if we would offer non-Jews bids. during my time there it was always yes. i know that for some time during the early 80s they had decided not to. but that had changed again by the time i entered Tech in '88

once that general decision was made by the brothers, no specific person's religion was in any way relevant to whether they would get a bid. that was purely decided on how they fared in the group and how much their family could give in monetary support. ha, i kid. money was also not considered. BUT GRADES WERE! we took great pride in being top GPA and were serious about maintaining that
 
TampaBayJacket said:
Yes, SAE is universally hated. I didnt realize the ATOs hated them too, though. I thought those two were in bed together?
Click to expand...

there was actually some bad blood between them at the time i was there, the result of some fight after one of the ATOs parties where they dug a pool into their yard and had a big slide into it.

the rift between the ATOs and the Betas that had been there was healed by mutual aggression toward the SAEs

DTD and Betas would lob fire-crackers at each other, but it was a fun rivalry, not a hateful one. the practice helped while providing aerial cover for the de-felination of the SAE yard.
 
EffinDane said:
Now they're rich.
Click to expand...

doubt it.

i dont think they will get any money for getting expelled. its protected free speech relative to jail and the law, but OU can have any policy they want to enforce a non-hostile environment and they likely have wording in the paperwork you sign as a student to be able to enforce that

i bet he conferred with university lawyers before doing this

also, would you sue the school in order to be pariah and stand up and say in public that you have the right to say those things? hopefully shame with stop them from even trying
 
BuzzCzar said:
doubt it.

i dont think they will get any money for getting expelled. its protected free speech relative to jail and the law, but OU can have any policy they want to enforce a non-hostile environment and they likely have wording in the paperwork you sign as a student to be able to enforce that

i bet he conferred with university lawyers before doing this
Click to expand...

The only people with a hostile environment claim would be people on the bus. However, being on that bus has nothing to do with going to the school, so that's a pretty weak argument.

BuzzCzar said:
also, would you sue the school in order to be pariah and stand up and say in public that you have the right to say those things? hopefully shame with stop them from even trying
Click to expand...

Everybody in the country should support these guys if they sue the school. You don't get to throw people out of school for speech. You cannot have successful higher education without free speech, otherwise you wind up like Liberty University.

These guys are jerkoffs, but freedom of speech is worth suffering jerkoffs.
 
EffinDane said:
Everybody in the country should support these guys if they sue the school. You don't get to throw people out of school for speech. You cannot have successful higher education without free speech, otherwise you wind up like Liberty University.

These guys are jerkoffs, but freedom of speech is worth suffering jerkoffs.
Click to expand...

i believe in free speech, but i do not believe in promoting an atmosphere of intolerance in a group and creating a potential for real hostility. i would not support them

if it was one guy making statements, or the group was on campus with a permit, then im fine with it. i also think it would be ok for them to do it in the privacy of their own location, without broadcasting it into the public

i dont think you have the right to incite violence, or act this way in leading a group with hostile behavior, and this qualifies, imo. i would not support them
 
Xihix said:
fraternities are safe havens for sexual assault, rape and racism. white people who involve themselves in them are gross. i honestly do believe the benefits they claim of them (networking, philanthropy, etc.) is just a giant cover up for the mentioned things they do. evil öööös
Click to expand...

how did no one :bigcry: this post?
 
Good job OU, you have stopped a few guys from saying hurtful things who were part of a group that unofficially was not open to all students. That is hurtful and hateful. Now, repent completely by donating that frat house to the office of minority affairs that will official discriminate against your students.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top