Next GT head Coach

Steve Sarkisian

boog.0.gif
 
This is from the Ivan Allen College of Liberal Arts:
Analytical abilities are a fundamental strength of all Georgia Tech students. To help them develop those skills, Tech students are required to take differential calculus, integral calculus, and linear algebra. However, most liberal arts students have an alternative math option more closely aligned with their majors. With the help of their advisors, Ivan Allen students select one of these sequences. About half of IAC undergraduates take each path.

https://www.iac.gatech.edu/
https://www.iac.gatech.edu/students/undergraduate/faq - take a look at the response to the fourth question

I don't think it's splitting hairs to point out that a Survey of Calculus course is quite different than three courses of calculus (diff, int, linear algebra).

Survey of calculus = pussy calculus <> no calculus
 
Good. Despite playing one of the weakest schedules in all of P5, Cutcliffe still has a losing record at Duke. We're pretty much the best team they've beaten the last few years, and I don't mean that as a compliment to them.

Feeling better not.
 
Mike McIntyre is 5-1 at Colorado this season with the one loss at USC west. He has more collegiate head coaching success than any of the other coach's with Tech ties. He has national recruiting experience which I think is a key to signing better players. Colorado plays at Washington on FOX in a few minutes.
I am not sure we could convince him to come here. Who ever we get will be a gamble. I would rather have someone who comes here because of their ties to Tech than someone who comes here because they have no other P5 opportunities.
 
Mike McIntyre is 5-1 at Colorado this season with the one loss at USC west. He has more collegiate head coaching success than any of the other coach's with Tech ties. He has national recruiting experience which I think is a key to signing better players. Colorado plays at Washington on FOX in a few minutes.
I am not sure we could convince him to come here. Who ever we get will be a gamble. I would rather have someone who comes here because of their ties to Tech than someone who comes here because they have no other P5 opportunities.
He also has 4 losing seasons in 5 years at Colorado. He literally finished last place in his division every single season but one. No thanks.
 
What about Jim Mora? We could do much worse. Not sure if he liked Atlanta or not though?
 
Mike McIntyre is 5-1 at Colorado this season with the one loss at USC west. He has more collegiate head coaching success than any of the other coach's with Tech ties. He has national recruiting experience which I think is a key to signing better players. Colorado plays at Washington on FOX in a few minutes.
He also has 4 losing seasons in 5 years at Colorado. He literally finished last place in his division every single season but one. No thanks.
Point counterpoint
 
He also has 4 losing seasons in 5 years at Colorado. He literally finished last place in his division every single season but one. No thanks.
And any self respecting person with Tech ties should know better than to go anywhere near 5 down getting, phantom blocking call getting, national championship stealing ööööfaced colorado. öööö him.
 
He also has 4 losing seasons in 5 years at Colorado. He literally finished last place in his division every single season but one. No thanks.
Colrado was 1-11 the year before he arrived. His fourth season at Colorado, he went 10-4 and won the PAC South with wins over Stanford and UCLA. They dropped back to 5-7 last year but he appears to have them back on track this season.
San Jose State was 2-10 the year before he arrived. His fourth season at San Jose State, he went 10-2 and left for Colorado.
I think he is as likely to succeed as any of the other potential options.
 
Just looking at conference records, since OOC is misleading due to huge variation in opponent quality:

MacIntyre conference records:
1-8
0-9
1-8
8-1
2-7

Johnson conference records;
5-3
7-1
4-4
5-3
5-3
5-3
6-2
1-7
4-4
4-4

We should fire the guy who's had losing seasons 10% of the time to hire the guy who's had losing seasons 80% of the time?
 
Just looking at conference records, since OOC is misleading due to huge variation in opponent quality:

MacIntyre conference records:
1-8
0-9
1-8
8-1
2-7

Johnson conference records;
5-3
7-1
4-4
5-3
5-3
5-3
6-2
1-7
4-4
4-4

We should fire the guy who's had losing seasons 10% of the time to hire the guy who's had losing seasons 80% of the time?
We should only force a change if our AD believes he has a better option. We will not have any guaranteed winners lining up for the position.
 
Back
Top