Every few years some idiot makes this “College NC could beat the <worst pro team>” and it is an idiotic statement. The worst NFL team would ööööing SMASH a college team. It wouldn’t be close.
I think we had 2 DL transfer commits switch to other teams over last spring didn't we? Or was that over the season after Collins was fired?
You somehow read something into my comment that is t there. As for depth, it shouldn't take more than 5-7 years to build the depth to compete with anybody.
lehighfootballnation.blogspot.com
I’m a professional arm chair QB, so does that count?
I remember a conversation about this same thing from Hugh Douglas on a 92.9 segment about the dwags last year. He said they’d get shut out because the speed of the NFL game would dominate them.
“Harvard has a financial aid policy which states that if your parents make less than $65,000 a year, if you apply and pass Harvard's stringent academic requirements, you can attend school for free.”Then basically the entire Ivy League is "cheating." There's plenty of literature out there if you're actually interested in learning more, but in a nutshell, athletes at Ivies are generally receiving a ton of financial aid, to the extent that the lack of an athletic scholarship is basically a technicality.
.How The Ivy League Is Able To Break the NCAA's Scholarship Limits and Still Consider Themselves FCS
Since 2003, my blog is the unofficial place for Lehigh football news, commentary, as well as the Patriot League.
Depends, would you have won the Super Bowl for the Falcon's, given a 28-3 lead in the 3rd?
If that is all you saw in that article, there is a zero percent chance anyone at Cornell wanted you. I know 3rd graders with better reading comprehension.
I have stayed away from this öööö show for the last however many pages it's turned into crap, but damn it is very evident and has been pointed out to you in several threads now that your reading comprehension is severely lacking. Do you even know what you are arguing about? It appears you do not. The basis of that article linked above and the basis of the argument presented to you in this thread is this:
You'll be OK. It's the offseason. There are literally only a few active football threads right now.
Don't know how things might be different than in 1996-2000 but in that time frame no athletics scholarships were given. Each student's parents submitted financial statements and each and every student was given some amount of a grant and the parents had a "responsibility", as the school termed it. All income based.
Never doubt Harvard's desire to defeat Yale at football, baseball, rowing......there have always been scholarships given based on "beat Yale" and vise versa
I understand they don't call them "athletic" scholarships. That is their loophole. But they are 100% recruiting athletes, many of whom they know will fall in the "low-income" bracket and be eligible for full or nearly full-tuition grants.
Pretty much almost everyone falls into "low income" when it comes to affording an Ivy League school.
Yes, that's probably how they all work out. I was merely pointing out that all students were given grants based on family income and we all know how they parse their definition based their desired sports outcomes.
