acc agreement

Sources have suggested Clemson and Florida State would be among the biggest winners of this brand-based distribution, though North Carolina and Miami are others expected to come out with a higher payout. Georgia Tech was actually the ACC's highest-rated program in 2024, based in part on a Week 0 game against Florida State and a seven-overtime thriller against Georgia on the final Friday of the regular season.
Click to expand...

:giggity:
 
I should wait for the details before commenting, but why not suppose. It would appear Phillips is so far doing a good job. He seems to have locked up things until 2030 for the conference and who the heck knows what is going to happen after that. The new TV contracts for SEC and BIGI could make the ACC long term TV contract a big loser or even possibly a big winner. No way to know.

I assume all the conference members have voted on the proposal and it was accepted. Would be interesting to know Ga Tech positions on proposal (likes/dislikes) as well as other schools positions. It will come out.
 
Time to do what we all want and wish for....Time to schedule Auburn, Tennessee, Alabama, Ohio State, Michigan, Florida as non conference opponents in various years and drop the small schools. Would be a tough schedule but TV ratings would be gold.....
 
mookie43 said:
Time to do what we all want and wish for....Time to schedule Auburn, Tennessee, Alabama, Ohio State, Michigan, Florida as non conference opponents in various years and drop the small schools. Would be a tough schedule but TV ratings would be gold.....
Click to expand...
good point on scheduling
 
mookie43 said:
Time to do what we all want and wish for....Time to schedule Auburn, Tennessee, Alabama, Ohio State, Michigan, Florida as non conference opponents in various years and drop the small schools. Would be a tough schedule but TV ratings would be gold.....
Click to expand...
I'm sure Auburn would be for it. Maybe Tennessee and Florida
 
mookie43 said:
Time to do what we all want and wish for....Time to schedule Auburn, Tennessee, Alabama, Ohio State, Michigan, Florida as non conference opponents in various years and drop the small schools. Would be a tough schedule but TV ratings would be gold.....
Click to expand...
We should at least try. I think Auburn especially might be willing.
 
mookie43 said:
Time to do what we all want and wish for....Time to schedule Auburn, Tennessee, Alabama, Ohio State, Michigan, Florida as non conference opponents in various years and drop the small schools. Would be a tough schedule but TV ratings would be gold.....
Click to expand...
Surprised if non conference games count toward viewership for splitting conference money but if so I like the idea of playing SEC and even
Big10 teams. Would like if we tried to drop ND in football since they are not in the conference and I don't want to help them. We are better off
scheduling the surrounding SEC teams than those leaches.
 
fatmike91 said:
per ESPN:

"Georgia Tech was actually the ACC's highest-rated program in 2024."

"This new revenue-distribution model -- or "brand initiative" -- is based on a five-year rolling average of TV ratings."

/
Click to expand...
So then what I’m hearing is that we all need to buy season tickets, but then stay at home to watch the games on TV to get the most money….
 
So we were actually the highest rated school in the past season, we don’t benefit in the proposed distribution but Clemson, FSU, UNC and Miami do, and the distribution plan is based on brand demonstrated by ratings. Sounds like an ACC plan to me. I suggest we sue the ACC to leverage a positive settlement.
 
mookie43 said:
Time to do what we all want and wish for....Time to schedule Auburn, Tennessee, Alabama, Ohio State, Michigan, Florida as non conference opponents in various years and drop the small schools. Would be a tough schedule but TV ratings would be gold.....
Click to expand...
Yes. Trade games with UNC, WF, NCST, and Duke for those teams.
 
77GTFan said:
So we were actually the highest rated school in the past season, we don’t benefit in the proposed distribution but Clemson, FSU, UNC and Miami do, and the distribution plan is based on brand demonstrated by ratings. Sounds like an ACC plan to me. I suggest we sue the ACC to leverage a positive settlement.
Click to expand...
By my reading, they're just guessing on who will "benefit" from the brand distribution. I'm assuming our strong showing last year will cancel out one of the down Clown years and we'll be around average to start off. Keep up our momentum and we'll be set to have an above-average distribution going forward.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top