F
fljacket
Guest
You clearly do not understand how this game is played. Until your team has fully analyzed every weakness of the NCAA report and decided on the best avenue for appeal, you play it a bit conciliatory while still insisting on your version of the facts. The lawyers (and thank god the idiot Randy Nordin who got us into this mess, in part, is no longer involved) will dissect the thing into little tiny pieces and decide how to proceed. Every thing you say at the press conference could be used by the NCAA to shoot down your appeal, so you don't say too much until you know what approach to take to the appeal.
The issue seems to be that we had relied on a lawyer who wasn't experienced with NCAA investigation, who then took the typical obstructionary lawyer approach to investigations, and the NCAA got pissed about it and stretched themselves to put us on probation. Do I have that right?
My guess is DRad is regretting not going with experienced outside counsel instead, but he probably thought it was unnecessary for freaking $312 of clothes from a relative.