2nd worst defensive performance in GT history

Paul Johnson said:
“And part of the issues are nobody beats a block, nobody tackles anybody, nobody covers anybody. That about covers it.”
Click to expand...

What's the other part, there, coach?
 
If I had gif skills and time, I'd chop op a part of the first drive. I think it was a play before their first TD, somebody comes around the right side, I think it was a TE, and blocks two whole freaking defenders. One with each hand. Not even hyperbole.
 
ThisIsAtlanta said:
If I had gif skills and time, I'd chop op a part of the first drive. I think it was a play before their first TD, somebody comes around the right side, I think it was a TE, and blocks two whole freaking defenders. One with each hand. Not even hyperbole.
Click to expand...

I know exactly the play you're talking about. It was Davis and Mitchell.

Roof is their position coach, too, by the way.
 
GT1992 said:
20 points and multiple turnovers looked great? This is the problem with medical marijuana.
Click to expand...

This is getting ridiculous. If we score 3, 7, 10, 17, or 20 in the second half, what goddamn difference does it make in yesterday's outcome?

We didn't have the 2nd worst defensive performance in schoool history because of the offense so why do you numbnuts keep bringing it up in every thread about the shitty defense?
 
Hoffie7 said:
Not surprising. Painful to watch . Offense again looked great.
Click to expand...
Wait what? Which part of scoring only 20 points in spite of a lot of yards gained, fumbling the ball 4 times (thankfully only turning it over 2 of those times), is "looking great?" We had 5 possessions in the second half and only the first ended in points and that was only a FG. The offense didn't even look "good" much less "great." The object of offense is to score points, not rack up first downs or yards and that's all we did.

Of course the defense was epically bad as well so I agree with that part also being painful to watch.
 
ElCidBUZZingFAN said:
This is getting ridiculous. If we score 3, 7, 10, 17, or 20 in the second half, what goddamn difference does it make in yesterday's outcome?

We didn't have the 2nd worst defensive performance in schoool history because of the offense so why do you numbnuts keep bringing it up in every thread about the ööööty defense?
Click to expand...
Offense did not look great.
 
ThisIsAtlanta said:
If I had gif skills and time, I'd chop op a part of the first drive. I think it was a play before their first TD, somebody comes around the right side, I think it was a TE, and blocks two whole freaking defenders. One with each hand. Not even hyperbole.
Click to expand...
Or how about when our offensive lineman decided that blocking was too much of a chore and went blocking nobody on one of Mills runs while the guy he clearly saw made the tackle? That replay showed me how much Sewak sucks.
 
GT1992 said:
Offense did not look great.
Click to expand...

No shit.

The offense put up great numbers outside of points. We totally shit the bed in the redzone. Yesterday wasn't a Clemson or Miami effort where the offense couldn't stay on the field or cough up idiotic turnovers on a short field inflating the D's numbers.

The offense would have to be pristine perfect for us to even have a chance yesterday. That's an absurd standard to win a football game.
 
One thing I noticed is that instead of trying to avoid UNC's offensive blockers, our defenders were initiating the contact. One of our pass rushers could've easily dodged the blocker but chose to initiate the contact.
 
ElCidBUZZingFAN said:
No öööö.

The offense put up great numbers outside of points. We totally öööö the bed in the redzone. Yesterday wasn't a Clemson or Miami effort where the offense couldn't stay on the field or cough up idiotic turnovers on a short field inflating the D's numbers.

The offense would have to be pristine perfect for us to even have a chance yesterday. That's an absurd standard to win a football game.
Click to expand...
So why did we hire Paul Johnson? Did you see Navy run the clock out against a team who kicked our ass last year?
 
rsmith88 said:
One thing I noticed is that instead of trying to avoid UNC's offensive blockers, our defenders were initiating the contact. One of our pass rushers could've easily dodged the blocker but chose to initiate the contact.
Click to expand...

Been yelling at my TV about this for a while. Our guys look like they were trained on how to defend by looking at the opposing team's game plan and then just executing it rather than scheming around it.
 
ElCidBUZZingFAN said:
The öööö kinda question is that? Jesus.
Click to expand...
One that shows Johnson's skills and effort have diminished. Once you realize that it is a boat race, you don't try a field goal on 4th and 3. He doesn't believe in the offense anymore.
 
GT1992 said:
One that shows Johnson's skills and effort have diminished. Once you realize that it is a boat race, you don't try a field goal on 4th and 3. He doesn't believe in the offense anymore.
Click to expand...

Lets look at the scenarios when we kicked FGs:

Down 17-7, 4th and goal from the 6. There is no decision other than to kick the FG in this scenario.

Down 27-17, 4th and 3 from the 20. You take the FG and make it a one score game again.

Both time, we cut it from 2 scores to 1 and kept us in the game a little longer.

If you truly believe we should've done anything else in these scenarios, you are as dumb as your online persona.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top