gt2690b
Dodd-Like
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2010
- Messages
- 10,376
also the article does some math and concludes ESPN would cost $40 / month and concludes nobody would pay that much.. i don't think $40/month is that unreasonable in todays marketOne point that loses me is that I paid for ESPN as part of a bundle when I had cable. I've since cut the cord and have YouTubeTV streaming, where I am paying for ESPN as part of a bundle. How is ESPN losing? Is the article predicting the coming of ala cart streaming and that is what will kill ESPN? Or is it that many of the streaming options don't include ESPN and many cord-cutters are choosing those options?