GT1992
Dodd-Like
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2006
- Messages
- 27,721
That might be an embarrassingly low number of plays in 4th and 1 situations.
Isn't that a criticism of the OL and backs moreso than Tevin?
That might be an embarrassingly low number of plays in 4th and 1 situations.
Isn't that a criticism of the OL and backs moreso than Tevin?
Hard to do that when he checks out of them...or runs out of the pocket...or picks the wrong gap....or isn't quite strong enough....or athletic enough...you see where I am going? It's not that easy.
The qb put himself in a situation he couldn't deal with.
Why does our level of recruiting put limits on our success? It's easy to respond that Kansas State is comparable to Tech in recruiting, but they are performing well this year. Miami has had exceptional recruiting for years, but they were embarrassed by KSU. It's easy to single out one game and try to claim that it proves your opinion is valid, but in a few weeks he'll probably use a different game as evidence of the opposite opinion. It's just blah, blah, blah to fill up some space and sell ads.
Mark should run for politics cause I've never seen someone write something as long as this and as flip-floppy and at the end makes absolutely no sense.
The points he makes in sequence:
1. Says CPJ's offense wasn't at fault
2. Says Al Groh's defense wasn't at fault
3. It's Paul Johnson
4. Coaching same way as he always had been
5. It's cause Nesbitt left
6. Tevin sucks
7. But it's not Tevin's fault
8. Without '08 '09 players offense functions
9. Offense still functions with '12 players
10. But offense can't kill clock
11. Defense was missing tackles, but not defense's fault
12. Tech beat wake in '09 with go-ahead TD in OT
13. '09 CPJ chose to go for 4th and short, it worked
14. '12 CPJ chose to go for 4th and short, it didn't work
15. "Same coach, same bold choice. Different players, different result."
16. Running pro-style offense will leave GT last in league.
17. We just have a "stylized" offense and that's it.
No I am pretty sure nesbitts Oline was equally as putrid. Had folks recruited at RB and WR playing Oline then.
Coach makes the call to go for it. That comes with some level of QB risk that needs to be factored into the decision.
Mark should run for politics cause I've never seen someone write something as long as this and as flip-floppy and at the end makes absolutely no sense.
The points he makes in sequence:
1. Says CPJ's offense wasn't at fault
2. Says Al Groh's defense wasn't at fault
3. It's Paul Johnson
4. Coaching same way as he always had been
5. It's cause Nesbitt left
6. Tevin sucks
7. But it's not Tevin's fault
8. Without '08 '09 players offense functions
9. Offense still functions with '12 players
10. But offense can't kill clock
11. Defense was missing tackles, but not defense's fault
12. Tech beat wake in '09 with go-ahead TD in OT
13. '09 CPJ chose to go for 4th and short, it worked
14. '12 CPJ chose to go for 4th and short, it didn't work
15. "Same coach, same bold choice. Different players, different result."
16. Running pro-style offense will leave GT last in league.
17. We just have a "stylized" offense and that's it.
Don't forget our talent level is "closer to Georgia Southern's than Georgia's"!
A really really bad article.
The truth
I only recall one converted TE, not backs and wide receivers. If your offense relies on Oline, why haven't you recruited it better? He's had 4 years now. Why haven't you recruited a big qb who can survive with inept line play?
Even if recruiting hasn't improved under CPJ, it certainly hasn't gotten any worse. Weird for anyone to characterize it as a new problem as the esteemed Mr Bradley has chosen to do here. His points about the adaptiveness of CPJ's play calling are odd too, given the ample criticism from many other sources that CPJ has become disastrously more conservative in that arena, even in the last game. But what's weirdest about the article is that the framing of it is essentially "it's not Tech's offense that is causing it to lose". There's just one blurb in the whole thing about the defense not being Alabama, and the rest of it is about Paul Johnson's play calling and recruiting.
Seems like since Paul Johnson lost a game, lots of people feel like whatever issues they have with him must absolutely be the case, and if you have a problem with it, SCOREBOARD! There are some valid criticisms to be had but this is pretty dumb. Everyone is just in such a hurry to be right, though, that my worst fear is we'll never know, one way or the other. I'm glad that remains a seemingly outside shot, for the moment.
I am not CPJ but thanks anyway. We are seeing that CPJ missed on recruiting a qb the first couple of years. This isn't the NFL where he can just go pick one up.
Bark Madley's writing talents are closer to Heather Dinich's than Furman Bisher.
I only recall one converted TE, not backs and wide receivers. If your offense relies on Oline, why haven't you recruited it better? He's had 4 years now. Why haven't you recruited a big qb who can survive with inept line play?