GoldZ
Dodd-Like
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2002
- Messages
- 6,254
I think this is going to make a bigger difference at the bottom/middle of our recruiting class than at the top. While we can compete for better players at the top, we still have to get them here. But when we miss, the door stays open for some solid guys further down the list that might not ordinarily have gotten a look. Our tendency now is to take guys who are perceived to have more flaws athletically, but not academically, to fill in the gaps on our recruiting roster. Now, we consider a guy with less athletic downside, but not considered to be an NFL prospect, who may need more classroom help. We wouldn't have been able to look at him before. That's going to improve depth.
Well, the way this has helped in the past, is at the top---otherwise we have no legacy to speak of.