CPJ Radio Show

cyptomcat

cyptomcat

Hibernating
Joined
Nov 19, 2007
Messages
69,984
CPJ: All those guys tweeting me and messaging me about playcalling, I would take y'all a lot more seriously if you knew slot receiver is ineligible.
 
What happened to the CPJ that was ballsy enough to pass to a wide open player regardless of eligibility? We're so screwed.
 
Paul, some friendly advice... when you are winning the gruff, smartest guy in the room answers are funny. However, on a 3 game losing streak, not so much.
 
EffinDane said:
At the show. He really doesn't like folks questioning his play calling.
Click to expand...


Care to elaborate for people not able to listen? Or are we just going to wait on texstinger to show up and say he should be game planning and not wasting time on stupid radio show callers?
 
The Jacket said:
Care to elaborate for people not able to listen? Or are we just going to wait on texstinger to show up and say he should be game planning and not wasting time on stupid radio show callers?
Click to expand...

A guy asked a question about the formation and asked if he was setting something up with a throw over there after shifting the slot guy off the line. PJ got hella defensive and started with a typical I'm so smart, my offense can't be stopped when we execute response. While maybe true... the team isn't executing and the offense was stopped on key plays. I like CPJ, but this isn't a good look on a losing streak IMO.
 
The Jacket said:
Care to elaborate for people not able to listen? Or are we just going to wait on texstinger to show up and say he should be game planning and not wasting time on stupid radio show callers?
Click to expand...

Caller called in with a follow up saying that leaving a receiver ineligible gave them the numbers advantage. CPJ squirmed in his chair and tried to interrupt the guy until he finished, then gave him a smartass yet very informative explanation about how if was still causing them problems and how it really was working a lot.
 
05GTCorndog said:
Paul, some friendly advice... when you are winning the gruff, smartest guy in the room answers are funny. However, on a 3 game losing streak, not so much.
Click to expand...

If you're man enough you should call in and say that.
 
05GTCorndog said:
A guy asked a question about the formation and asked if he was setting something up with a throw over there after shifting the slot guy off the line. PJ got hella defensive and started with a typical I'm so smart, my offense can't be stopped when we execute response. While maybe true... the team isn't executing and the offense was stopped on key plays. I like CPJ, but this isn't a good look on a losing streak IMO.
Click to expand...



EffinDane said:
Caller called in with a follow up saying that leaving a receiver ineligible gave them the numbers advantage. CPJ squirmed in his chair and tried to interrupt the guy until he finished, then gave him a smartass yet very informative explanation about how if was still causing them problems and how it really was working a lot.
Click to expand...


Word and heard, thanks. I honestly don't think it's something he can turn off. At least he gave the guy a legitimate answer, even if he acted like it was beneath him while doing so.
 
The Jacket said:
I just called, I think I'm on some weird three-way-hold and I hear this guy mumbling "Dwayne from Rochester.. different fabric on the throwbacks.. Vad Lee.."
Click to expand...

It's a portal to a parallel dimension.
 
The Jacket said:
I just called, I think I'm on some weird three-way-hold and I hear this guy mumbling "Dwayne from Rochester.. different fabric on the throwbacks.. Vad Lee.."
Click to expand...

öööö it! How many times do I have to tell you? A three way should never include an extra Johnson.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top