CPJ Radio Show

Did CPJ say at any point that he is to blame for this debacle? Clearly he is, but I doubt he has the stones to admit it.
 
05GTCorndog said:
Paul, some friendly advice... when you are winning the gruff, smartest guy in the room answers are funny. However, on a 3 game losing streak, not so much.
Click to expand...

What exactly is the thing to say when your team is riding a three-game losing streak that will make you feel better?

Other than, perhaps, "I invented a time machine and I will now go back in time and not call those plays".
 
Allen Koholic said:
What exactly is the thing to say when your team is riding a three-game losing streak that will make you feel better?

Other than, perhaps, "I invented a time machine and I will now go back in time and not call those plays".
Click to expand...

You are on a 3 game losing streak. You know the fans are antsy. Maybe dial up a little more coach speak and put blame on staff rather than continuing to defend play calling that didn't work the last 35 minutes of the game. The play calling wasn't brilliant because it didn't work. Who cares about how great schematically the play design was if it didn't work?
 
Sorry to compare PJ with Richt in this thread, but have you noticed how Richt gives way too much of a öööö about what the fans think he should do with players? He benched his QB in the second quarter vs Alabama cause the fans would give him hell if he didn't. I'm thankful PJ doesn't listen to us dumbasses telling him he needs to call different plays. The radio show is kinda dumb.

That being said, I do agree with Corndog that PJ can put the blame on the coaches. The blocking being bad one week may be a player issue. Three weeks in a row is a coaching issue in my opinion. But either way, take the heat. You're the man in charge
 
Shiiiiiiiiiiiiiii...

He beat Georgia last year. He can do no wrong. Amirite?
 
05GTCorndog said:
You are on a 3 game losing streak. You know the fans are antsy. Maybe dial up a little more coach speak and put blame on staff rather than continuing to defend play calling that didn't work the last 35 minutes of the game. The play calling wasn't brilliant because it didn't work. Who cares about how great schematically the play design was if it didn't work?
Click to expand...

Didn't we score 31 points against UNC? The most they've given up in a game and the first time anyone's gone over 20 against them?

We held the ball for 40 minutes, punted twice, and had one incredibly costly fumble.

How exactly was it the offensive playcalling's fault we lost this game? Because we failed at scoring from inside the 5 one time during the game and then got the ball back anway?

Going for another score at the end of the half was gutsy, but considering how quickly UNC got down the field anyway, without using timeouts I doubt they needed them anyway, not to mention to that point they had only one sustained drive against the defense.
 
cyptomcat said:
CPJ: All those guys tweeting me and messaging me about playcalling, I would take y'all a lot more seriously if you knew slot receiver is ineligible.
Click to expand...

I'll admit that when I was watching from the stands I couldn't tell that the slot was ineligible, but that's the thing that is confusing to me about CPJ's answer to the question. He said he was trying to confuse the D, the safety in particular, and they were running off that read.

First, I don't see how a 'blocker' lined up that far from the O-line gives the offense an advantage and I didn't hear it from his explanation.

Second, if they were trying to confuse the Safety, it didn't seem to be working, because he was leaving the slot receiver wide open as if he recognized that the guy was ineligible, which brought him much closer to the box giving them the numbers against the run.

Can somebody explain what I'm missing here?
 
clapper said:
Second, if they were trying to confuse the Safety, it didn't seem to be working, because he was leaving the slot receiver wide open as if he recognized that the guy was ineligible, which brought him much closer to the box giving them the numbers against the run.
Click to expand...

This is really the part about CPJ that drives me nuts. He states "We're gonna do what we're gonna do" and it FEELS like there is rarely any adjustment to what the actual defense is doing.

I like CPJ, he can win here and does, I just don't understand his stubbornness.
 
Why is someone ineligible referred to as a "receiver"?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk
 
YankeeBuzz said:
This is really the part about CPJ that drives me nuts. He states "We're gonna do what we're gonna do" and it FEELS like there is rarely any adjustment to what the actual defense is doing.

I like CPJ, he can win here and does, I just don't understand his stubbornness.
Click to expand...

Yeah, he'd never try something completely new offensively after two losses, like, you know, run no-huddle the whole game or something.
 
05GTCorndog said:
You are a great GT fan.

I'm not even talking öööö about him. I'm just saying some stuff that is true. I'm not going out of the way to take extra shots at him... but the 'if they hold the blocks/execute' things will work excuse is weak. We all know it is true, but the head coach using it to deflect criticism is pretty lame. Dial up a little more coach speak and take some of the heat off the players i.e.'I have to prepare these guys better and get plays called that they can execute effectively.' I was chatting about this with a few USNA grads tonight and this was pretty much the one criticism they had about him.

tldr; IIWII
Click to expand...

lol you idiot i was defending you.
 
Being a Georgia Tech fan is SOOOO tiresome. Whining and bitching, bitching and whining. Over analyzing again and again and again. All of it coming from people who don't know if a football is blown up or stuffed.

Coach Johnson has a track record, and it's a öööö good one. He can only call the plays that will work if executed. he can't go out and execute them. He didn't forget how to coach in the off-season, no more than you guys forgot how to masturbate while watching Bill Nye or seeing a picture of Neil DeGrasse Tyson.
 
veerbone said:
Being a Georgia Tech fan is SOOOO tiresome. Whining and bitching, bitching and whining. Over analyzing again and again and again. All of it coming from people who don't know if a football is blown up or stuffed.

Coach Johnson has a track record, and it's a öööö good one. He can only call the plays that will work if executed. he can't go out and execute them. He didn't forget how to coach in the off-season, no more than you guys forgot how to masturbate while watching Bill Nye or seeing a picture of Neil DeGrasse Tyson.
Click to expand...

K...
 
veerbone said:
Being a [insert any football team] fan is SOOOO tiresome. Whining and bitching, bitching and whining. Over analyzing again and again and again. All of it coming from people who don't know if a football is blown up or stuffed.

[insert coach name] has a track record, and it's a öööö good one. He can only call the plays that will work if executed. he can't go out and execute them. He didn't forget how to coach in the off-season, no more than you guys forgot how to masturbate while watching Bill Nye or seeing a picture of Neil DeGrasse Tyson.
Click to expand...

ftfy
 
veerbone said:
Being a Georgia Tech fan is SOOOO tiresome. Whining and bitching, bitching and whining. Over analyzing again and again and again. All of it coming from people who don't know if a football is blown up or stuffed.

Coach Johnson has a track record, and it's a öööö good one. He can only call the plays that will work if executed. he can't go out and execute them. He didn't forget how to coach in the off-season, no more than you guys forgot how to masturbate while watching Bill Nye or seeing a picture of Neil DeGrasse Tyson.
Click to expand...

I think you have your points (although I imagine most fanbases are similar), but don't be that guy that tries to start a schism between alumni GT fans and sidewalk GT fans.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top