Did Bbbuzzzooooffff call it quits...

As a poster on both stingtalk and bbuzzoff I will say that none of my posts on BO have ever been nuked, whereas on stingtalk they rarely stay up for a day. By the way BJ67, thanks for taking me off your ignore list!
 
yellowbritchies said:
As a poster on both stingtalk and bbuzzoff I will say that none of my posts on BO have ever been nuked, whereas on stingtalk they rarely stay up for a day. By the way BJ67, thanks for taking me off your ignore list!
Click to expand...

I had one post nuked as you call it by BB. It was a post where I was giving MsTA hades for one of her post. Many people jumped the thread and also lambasted her. BB deleted the post and that was it. No more nor less.
 
By the way BJ67, thanks for taking me off your ignore list!
Click to expand...

Lol. Can't say I'm not for second chances, hehe.

Way to dodge it for a fifth time, OF. You trip me out.
 
clapper said:
In the end? Certainly not a sporting event to the extent that my sole existence lies in seeing that the head coach is fired for reaching the wrong bowl game or losing the conference championship or whether we sign the next two and a half-star recruit that looks at us cross-eyed. There a ****loads of things that matter in the end. Sports isn't one of them.
Click to expand...

I was referring to Gailey's job performance, not the overall aspect of life.
 
If you call that post where you supposedly quoted Jim, to me that was not stalking just telling you how he feels. Maybe you call it stalking, I think otherwise. Now give me more quotes of PM and or emails and I'll read and think about them. Stalking to me is when someone, any one sends many emails/pms not just one, and makes threats, insinuates something etc. I was not dodging you, just thought it was not worth responding to.

RM does the Ursus sound good to you, remember European beer is 1/2 liter and a little stronger.

Also has anyone discovered is BO ever coming back?
 
I suppose now we get to have an argument about what the definition of "Stalking" is, so you can defend your Cult of Personality?

You're pathetic.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult_of_personality

I probably knew what a cult of personality was before you were born. Now lets hear your version of stalking. To me one email or pm does not constitute stalking. I guess people who get restraining orders against someone for stalking does not get one for someone just walking behind someone else. If they do you better watch out who you happen to walk behind. Maybe BB thinks you are an a-hole, would you rather he post it for every one to read or just email it to you. Lets hear from L-Bee as to what constitutes stalking in the eyes of the law.
 
Last edited:
two words.....

Animal Farm

(I'm sure even 'zoffers can figure that one out) ;)
 
If I considered it illegal, or it caused me any distress, I'd call the cops. It caused me no distress, so it fails the litmus test for illegality. That does not mean the BeeBad's not a schlong for doing it.

To me one email or pm does not constitute stalking.
Click to expand...
To me, using private information against it's intent in order to harass someone is stalking.

I could, for instance, look John Davis up in the phonebook, get his phone number, and call him on the phone to call him an asshole because he posted something I disagreed with on Stingtalk. That would be stalking. Even if it was only once. And even if it wasn't legally 'stalking' it's still a pretty lame thing to do.

ESPECIALLY if he had an unlisted number, and you had to go through a private internet database to get it.

If someone at your phone company got your personal info and used it to send you a letter calling you an asshole, they'd be fired.

If someone at your bank used your financial data to get your wife's cel phone number, to call her a bitch, they'd be fired.

If someone at the GTAA used your donation info to show up at your high school reunion to call you a cocksucker, they'd be fired.

AND YET, when BeeBad does it, it's totally fine as far as the Cult is concerned.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult_of_personality

PATHETIC.
 
Maybe BB was right. Did I say I agreed with his emailing you? No I did not! I do not agree with it nor do I think it was right. If I wanted to call you something similar I'd PM you. Again I don't agree he should have emailed you but if you were banned he had no other way to communicate his feeling to you. Again I don't agree with his email to you. Oh yes by the way your examples are HARASSMENT not stalking but nice try! Now get over this crap, it's over and done and no need to respond to your "stalking" again.

And get over this cult of personality crap. He is not Hitler, Stalin or Saddam Hussein, just a moderator on a board.
 
BBO and the posters on his board have been right about many things and wrong about many things as well. Just like all 3 boards! Whose up on the scoreboard of right? I don't know and could care less. Plus there are many posters with an assortment of views.

As far as censorship Bee has done some of that just like every board has. It has been my experience he has done it way less than the hive.

I think it was a great board that emphasized defending whatever view you could back up no matter how much the view was in the minority. All voices were allowed except on occasion when Bee would get in a bad mood, but that was the exception IMO. As a moderator overall he was great IMO. As a poster he made a lot of great/correct post, wrong post, and some just to stir the pot post. Overall he always made you think and defended his perspective well. Great poster as well. He will be missed! Like him or not a Legend dies!
 
Last edited:
Tech Head said:
Like him or not a Legend dies!
Click to expand...

I surely hope that board is gone, as they literally became a magnet for a number of antisocial misfit posters that no other GT board even wanted. Enough negative waves for one lifetime.

Onward and upward for GT now! :fingersx:
 
And get over this cult of personality crap. He is not Hitler, Stalin or Saddam Hussein, just a moderator on a board.
Click to expand...

He's a asshole of a moderator whose motivation is to undermine the ability of GT's head coach to do his job. You watch: if he hasn't already, he'll be going after PJ. It's how he gets his willies, it's how he gets traffic for his board.
 
GEETEELEE said:
He's a asshole of a moderator whose motivation is to undermine the ability of GT's head coach to do his job. You watch: if he hasn't already, he'll be going after PJ. It's how he gets his willies, it's how he gets traffic for his board.
Click to expand...

The BO moderator's motivation was not to undermine gailey's ability to do his job. And if you are a GT grad then you should turn in your diploma for thinking and saying something as dumb as that.

If you don't understand why gailey is no longer our coach then that''s reason no. 2 why you should forfeit your diploma. gailey would have been toast without the internet.
 
LongforDodd said:
The BO moderator's motivation was not to undermine gailey's ability to do his job. And if you are a GT grad then you should turn in your diploma for thinking and saying something as dumb as that.

If you don't understand why gailey is no longer our coach then that''s reason no. 2 why you should forfeit your diploma. gailey would have been toast without the internet.
Click to expand...

LFD, you must understand one thing, GTL was/is Gaileys number one fan. He supported him no matter what. He is the kind of fan that Tech in reality does not need. I could not support Gailey because of his inability to coach at the D1 level. GTL supported the guy even when it was evident to most that Tech needed to go in a different direction. GTL always said who can we get, as you saw we could have gotten anyone we really wanted. So yes GTL if he has a degree from Tech should turn it in.
 
Oh yes by the way your examples are HARASSMENT not stalking but nice try! Now get over this crap, it's over and done and no need to respond to your "stalking" again.
Click to expand...

...Except you seem to have dodged the issue about whether BeeBad is a tool.

Again.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top