Disappoint.

Discussion in 'Football' started by Dirty Jacket, Aug 30, 2019.

  1. GTWannaBee

    GTWannaBee Dodd-Like

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2006
    Messages:
    5,114
    Loc:
    Vidalia, GA
    Team:
    GT of course
    We shouldn't be playing with Johnson's players either, but we don't have a choice.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  2. gtfan088

    gtfan088 Dodd-Like

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2004
    Messages:
    15,431
    Loc:
    Greensboro, NC
    Team:
    Georgia Tech
    We weren't running flexbone. Is any offense that doesn't pass 30 times suddenly PJ's offense? Read option, zone read, etc. out of the shotgun are commonplace all over college football, and right now our personnel is more equipped for that than the "NFL-based" offense CGC mentioned in his opening presser. The quarterbacks and linemen we're going after in recruiting should be a good indication that that's not the plan long-term.
     
    • Like Like x 3
  3. gtfan088

    gtfan088 Dodd-Like

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2004
    Messages:
    15,431
    Loc:
    Greensboro, NC
    Team:
    Georgia Tech
    Yes, exactly. And while the passing game did look better with Graham in (combined with a slight drop-off in talent with Clemson's backups), the lack of pass protection should also help clue people into why we're not dropping back to pass a ton right now.
     
  4. vapspwi

    vapspwi Dodd-Like

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2002
    Messages:
    3,791
    Loc:
    Fayetteville, GA
    Well, they said we were going to an NFL offense. Just happened to be the Falcons’ offense in the red zone...

    JRjr
     
    • Like Like x 3
  5. ramblinwise1

    ramblinwise1 beware the zealot

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2001
    Messages:
    14,779
    Loc:
    1805 Land Lottery Territory
    Team:
    Georgia Tech
    I am disappoint we made so many BIG mental mistakes, but otherwise this outcome is about what was to be expected. I've only seen a few lowlights on the news. Really disappointing stuff: punt return muff, interception on goal line, giving up long runs to Etienne. Lucas Johnson must not be the answer. Its Graham or nothing it appears. Oliver could run some short yardage stuff from under center, but otherwise he's not the QB answer either apparently.
     
  6. jacket67

    jacket67 Dodd-Like

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2008
    Messages:
    8,357
    Loc:
    Tech Motel
    Team:
    Georgia Tech
    We will see next week what changes CDP makes for a less dominant opponent. I can understand the challenge of coming up with a strategy for Clemson, and trying to run on them with TO at QB was probably as good an idea as any. We might have had a better chance of success if the QB was under center, instead of the shotgun, running from 5 yards behind the line of scrimmage, but then our fans' heads would have exploded because they were promised a pro style look.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  7. GEETEELEE

    GEETEELEE Dodd-Like

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2002
    Messages:
    26,184
    Loc:
    Hog Mountain, GA
    Team:
    Ga Tech!
    Guys, even Johnson's offense took 3-4 games to really start clicking. While disappointed in the overall play, I saw reasons to be encouraged. This was a tough team to start out with a new coach.
     
  8. BrentwoodJacket

    BrentwoodJacket Damn Good Rat

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2007
    Messages:
    1,124
    Loc:
    Brentwood, Tennessee
    Team:
    Georgia Tech
    I was concerned about playing Oliver so much and Johnson so little. This morning, I think I know the reason. We were not going to win this game barring multiple miracles. We did not want to lose our best QB options for the season in this game. This is especially true for Johnson coming off of a major injury. Therefore, Oliver took most of the snaps against Clemson's first string D and Johnson saw minimal action. If Oliver plays this much against USF, I will be disappointed.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  9. Diseqc

    Diseqc Dodd-Like

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2008
    Messages:
    37,620
    Loc:
    :bigcry:
    lol
    You’re in denial. Johnson isn’t the best QB.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  10. TechAKnee

    TechAKnee Varsity Lurker

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2017
    Messages:
    280
    Loc:
    no clue
    Team:
    GT
    Not sneaking it on 3rd and 4th down with a foot or so to go with Oliver at QB was ridiculous play calling period. I’m not completely off the Oliver wagon. He’s got to have more pocket presence, and I think he will as the competition changes. If he makes a few easy passes, we were showing signs of moving the ball.
     
  11. GT18YJjr.

    GT18YJjr. Dodd-Like

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2006
    Messages:
    2,914
    Loc:
    Charlotte
    Team:
    Georgia Tech
    Going to answer this even if it is sarcasm.
    Yes, we have these ‘terrible’ olinemen from last year that blocked in an offense that was efficient for short yardage situations.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  12. The M-Train

    The M-Train Helluva Engineer

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2009
    Messages:
    2,266
    Loc:
    Atlanta
    Team:
    GT
    Game wasn't close, but the score could have been closer. No muffed punt and get rid of the stupid fumble we had inside their 30, plus either Swilling scores on the INT or the offense punches it in. Final score then is 38-21 and appears much more respectable. On the flip side, if it had been 14-7 or 21-7 at the half, Clemson would have kept their foot on the accelerator...

    Defense will be okay, special teams was so-so (although it's not their fault that we called for a punt on the 36 yard line), offense is, predictably, a nightmare.
     
  13. Diseqc

    Diseqc Dodd-Like

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2008
    Messages:
    37,620
    Loc:
    :bigcry:
    And how’d they do last year against Clemson?
     
    • Like Like x 1
  14. taxjacket

    taxjacket Varsity Lurker

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2018
    Messages:
    28
    Loc:
    Atlanta
    Team:
    Georgia Tech
    Neither is Oliver.... Shoot, it's got to be Graham after last night
     
    • Like Like x 1
  15. johncu

    johncu Dodd-Like

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2011
    Messages:
    7,210
    Loc:
    Greenville, SC
    Team:
    Georgia Tech
    I'm just not sure that I agree with that. Talented players are talented players. Very few CPJ recruits actually ran the option in high school. We just recruited the best athletes we could get into GT and taught them option football. Talent is fine at the skill positions, but we do have a lack of talent at OL. I don't think it's a system issue as much as it is pure lack of depth and talent, that was really hurt by the departure of our best OL in the offseason.

    I think we will look dramatically different when we play against teams of similar talent (i.e. everybody else in the ACC).
     
    • Like Like x 1
  16. Architorture23

    Architorture23 Austere Religious Scholar

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2011
    Messages:
    22,899
    Loc:
    Sec 111
    Team:
    Georgia Tech
    The OL actually wasn't as bad as I thought it would look last night. I'm only disappointed that Lucas didn't get more time and we didn't have more passes to TE and slot.

    I'm also disappointed in Special Teams. Muffed punt, letting punts hit the ground, poor KO returns on the ones that were returnable.

    But yes, Clemson is very good. We'll know more next weekend.
     
  17. BeeStorm

    BeeStorm The Dark Side of the Force Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2001
    Messages:
    18,174
    Loc:
    Not Conyers
    Team:
    GT
    49 - 21 against confirmed National Championship team > 52 - 14 against potential National Championship team

    gave up less points. scored more points.

    so I am going to say better last year.

    hope that answers your question.
     
    • Like Like x 3
    • Big Cry Big Cry x 1
  18. daBuzz

    daBuzz Dodd-Like

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2009
    Messages:
    19,226
    Loc:
    Woodstock, GA
    Team:
    Georgia Tech
    Yep, very true. Glad you pointed this out because I had forgotten that last year was the first year for the Paul Johnson offense and Paul was coaching an inherited roster of recruiting classes that ranked in the high 40's to low 50's in the country. Now that I remember that, it makes me realize it really is an apple-to-apple comparison.
     
    • Like Like x 3
    • Big Cry Big Cry x 1
  19. BrentwoodJacket

    BrentwoodJacket Damn Good Rat

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2007
    Messages:
    1,124
    Loc:
    Brentwood, Tennessee
    Team:
    Georgia Tech
    I did not say Johnson was the best QB. I was just trying to explain why Graham and Johnson did not play as much and why Johnson's time was so limited. Based on what I have seen, Graham should be the starter with Johnson as the backup. Oliver should be used primarily as a RB/WR. I would like to see Johnson get some snaps over the next two games.
     
  20. BeeStorm

    BeeStorm The Dark Side of the Force Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2001
    Messages:
    18,174
    Loc:
    Not Conyers
    Team:
    GT
    some coaches may have looked at the roster and implemented new schemes but keeping older situational ones that their personnel is built for.. then over time, they phase out the old as their personnel changes.. those coaches probably win more games in their first year.. but apparently not scoring from the 1 yard line in the shotgun formation is more attractive than scoring with a non NFL scheme..
     
    • Like Like x 3