Expansion

I think from the ACCs perspective, we needed the additions to keep the 3 schools actively working against the conference from destroying our media deals. My understanding is that if the conference drops below 15, ESPN can renegotiate. Redoing that deal sans Clemson, FSU, and UNC would vaporize the ACC. With the west coast schools, either the 3 traitors are locked in until the 2030s per the GOR or they leave and ESPN is over paying for the rest of the ACC until the contract is up.
 
Among the 133 FBS schools in the US News & World Report Best University rankings, by adding Stanford, Cal, SMU, (counting Notre Dame) the ACC will have 17 of the 40 best schools, the top 2, 4 of the top 7, and 8 of the top 15.
 
Does this mean WSU and OSU hold the rights to the old PAC10 games?
 
1000001629.jpg
 


Certainly the ACC will put us in the pod with these 3.

So? Easy from Atlanta to Dallas, with SMU being about 20 miles from the airport. Palo Alto/Berkeley (pretty much the same trip) is further, but not a bad flight.

I doubt scheduling would put all three as away games for any one team. There are a lot of teams in the ACC now +ND. I'm guessing ND will request Stanford every season.
 
So? Easy from Atlanta to Dallas, with SMU being about 20 miles from the airport. Palo Alto/Berkeley (pretty much the same trip) is further, but not a bad flight.

I doubt scheduling would put all three as away games for any one team. There are a lot of teams in the ACC now +ND. I'm guessing ND will request Stanford every season.
I have no problem with the additions, but there is no way in hell I will go to San Francisco for any reason these days.
 
Among the 133 FBS schools in the US News & World Report Best University rankings, by adding Stanford, Cal, SMU, (counting Notre Dame) the ACC will have 17 of the 40 best schools, the top 2, 4 of the top 7, and 8 of the top 15.
Best in foosball? Does anything else matter?
 
Back
Top