Football Tweets

00Burdell said:
When there are multiple alternatives, absolute metrics take a back seat to relative metrics.

When there is a single alternative, there is no relative metric so revert to absolute metrics.

So, if one, she's a 10 (or 8 or 3 or whatever). If many, they need to know how to line up.
Click to expand...

also... this being ST.. anything above a 6 is a really just a "solid 7"
 
GoGATech said:
The difference in the way people rated pics wasn't about what the ratings meant. The ratings have always been the "order," not a 1-10 hotness scale. The argument was always about whether you are numbering them as you see them in the pic, or are you numbering them as an order in which you think they are hottest. For instance, if you had 4 individuals in a pic, and your ranking was "4, 1, 2, 3" some folks interpret that as the far left is #4 (least hot), next person is #1 (hottest), next is #2, and the far right is #3. Other people take it as "person 4 (far right) in the pic is hottest, followed by person 1 (far left), then person 2, and last person 3."
Click to expand...
Those people that do it the latter way are dumb as öööö.
 
00Burdell said:
When there are multiple alternatives, absolute metrics take a back seat to relative metrics.

When there is a single alternative, there is no relative metric so revert to absolute metrics.

So, if one, she's a 10 (or 8 or 3 or whatever). If many, they need to know how to line up.
Click to expand...
In a good Stingtalk way,... why not both?
I offered two ways to rate, both provide useful data. Together, they provide the most data.
 
BuzzCzar said:
In a good Stingtalk way,... why not both?
I offered two ways to rate, both provide useful data. Together, they provide the most data.
Click to expand...
And if you include a third row that adds the first two rows together, you get even more data.
 
ZhUzk6.gif
 
GoGATech said:
The difference in the way people rated pics wasn't about what the ratings meant. The ratings have always been the "order," not a 1-10 hotness scale. The argument was always about whether you are numbering them as you see them in the pic, or are you numbering them as an order in which you think they are hottest. For instance, if you had 4 individuals in a pic, and your ranking was "4, 1, 2, 3" some folks interpret that as the far left is #4 (least hot), next person is #1 (hottest), next is #2, and the far right is #3. Other people take it as "person 4 (far right) in the pic is hottest, followed by person 1 (far left), then person 2, and last person 3."
Click to expand...
Those other people are wrong.
 
00Burdell said:
When there are multiple alternatives, absolute metrics take a back seat to relative metrics.

When there is a single alternative, there is no relative metric so revert to absolute metrics.

So, if one, she's a 10 (or 8 or 3 or whatever). If many, they need to know how to line up.
Click to expand...
More to this point, let’s say you had to choose between 3 solod 7s… hence ranking.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top