GoldenIsle
Damn Good Rat
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2017
- Messages
- 1,414
can take some shots he took tonight and turn around and stick his nose right back in there.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The dual threat is always better. Unless you have an absolutely INCREDIBLE QB and line. It is just another thing the other team has to deal with. I liked how the Fridge had some triple option in his O. You can't do it in the Pro's because your QB will be crushed.He’s a tough runner. Buster forgets he can run for quarters at a time.. we really need the dual threat scheme to win more ball games
What was the explanation on that again? It sounded like "he didn't intend to do it", but seems to me like most targeting infractions are unintentionalIn the post game show they showed him in the locker room. He had bruises all over his face. Probably from that BS no target call.
If there’s not an announcement from the ACC office tomorrow that they blew the call and #90 is suspended for their next game, Batt and Cabrera should be sending letters.What was the explanation on that again? It sounded like "he didn't intend to do it", but seems to me like most targeting infractions are unintentional
Yeah that was bizarre. “Yes it was targeting but the defender is really, really sorry.”What was the explanation on that again? It sounded like "he didn't intend to do it", but seems to me like most targeting infractions are unintentional
I had the sound turned off at the time, but gathered the announcers thought it was obvious targeting the way they kept going back and re-showing it even several plays later. What was their reaction?Yeah that was bizarre. “Yes it was targeting but the defender is really, really sorry.”
öööö they zoomed in on him when showing the replay and even he looked like he knew he was busted.
They kept asking for explanations cause they both thought it was obvious targetingI had the sound turned off at the time, but gathered the announcers thought it was obvious targeting the way they kept going back and re-showing it even several plays later. What was their reaction?
He has bruises on his face after every game. He’s a tough kid.In the post game show they showed him in the locker room. He had bruises all over his face. Probably from that BS no target call.
Everyone knows it was targeting.They kept asking for explanations cause they both thought it was obvious targeting
You can’t run King 25 times a game; Buster calls for the QB runs when we need it mostHe’s a tough runner. Buster forgets he can run for quarters at a time.. we really need the dual threat scheme to win more ball games
We get 15 for a baby push on the sidelines, our QB gets high lowed with a targeting and the ACC office remembers to öööö GT.What was the explanation on that again? It sounded like "he didn't intend to do it", but seems to me like most targeting infractions are unintentional
We could call for a pass to the TE.You can’t run King 25 times a game; Buster calls for the QB runs when we need it most
That "baby push on the sidelines" was as bad as the non-targeting call. Momentum of both players carried them both out of bounds with the hit that followed. No way that should have been a penalty. It almost changed the outcome of the game.We get 15 for a baby push on the sidelines, our QB gets high lowed with a targeting and the ACC office remembers to öööö GT.
True but to his point, we go 3 and out several possessions in a row before he uses it again. Then magically the offense is working againYou can’t run King 25 times a game; Buster calls for the QB runs when we need it most