Michael Cunningham

I seem to be one only a few people that have ZERO problem with CPJ's attitude and answers in the the post-game presser.

Also:

CPJ bristles when he gets opinionated statements from reporters instead of actual questions.

Nearly every time there is controversy about something CPJ said it usually starts with a reporter (frequently KQ) posing an opinionated statement as a question...

/
 
I don't know the tone with which it was delivered, and I think CPJ is pretty annoyed by KQ most of the time... but at heart it was a very fair question. TO had done everything asked of him and scored a couple of TD's. Suddenly we get to a passing down and he never sees the field again.

I think TQM did a good job in the game, and I don't think the QB change had much impact on the final outcome. Nevertheless, it was a reasonable question.
I think CPJ knows his personnel. Oliver had not thrown a pass or made may pitches, so when the passing down showed up, he put Marshall back in. That is what I wanted during the time-out. It looked to me that USF made an adjustment at the start of that series bring more players into the box.
 
In context the interview was pretty fair and civil both ways. PJ was spot on with several of his comments and KQ was great with his questions. I forgot about the dropped interception.

I honestly think putting TQ back in was not the issue. The defense had shown an adjustment to the speed option with Oliver and I think the magic was about used up with his 3 or 4 plays that he was capable of running. PJ should have just been honest and explained his logic instead of being snarky.
I'm snarky when I lose.
 
Cunningham bringing that fire!!!


Weekend Predictions: Boring Bulldogs roll, Tech and Falcons bounce back

Georgia Tech (minus-4 1/2) at Pittsburgh

Georgia Tech is not boring, and I don’t mean that as a positive for the Yellow Jackets. They blew a 10-point lead over the final 12-1/2 minutes at South Florida and lost by 11, this despite gaining 602 yards. Impressive, but Tech is the gold standard for empty yards and blown leads so it wasn’t nearly bad enough to qualify for worst loss.

The Jackets gained 655 yards against Tennessee last season (605 in regulation) and lost after leading by two touchdowns in the second half. That Tech meltdown featured special-teams gaffes, a lost fumble and a defensive surrender. Same thing happened at South Florida but at least Paul Johnson’s offense gained lots of yards.

You can make the case that USF’s two kickoff returns for TDs are outliers and that losing the fumble was bad luck. I’ll buy that, if only because I’m admittedly biased in favor of the metrics, which peg the Jackets as a two-touchdown favorite at Pitt.

Tech wins and covers. At least I know I’ll probably feel good about that pick for three quarters.

https://www.ajc.com/blog/mike-check...d-falcons-bounce-back/G6vLYrqY91sArj1mZJIcCJ/
 
Cunningham bringing that fire!!!


Weekend Predictions: Boring Bulldogs roll, Tech and Falcons bounce back

Georgia Tech (minus-4 1/2) at Pittsburgh

Georgia Tech is not boring, and I don’t mean that as a positive for the Yellow Jackets. They blew a 10-point lead over the final 12-1/2 minutes at South Florida and lost by 11, this despite gaining 602 yards. Impressive, but Tech is the gold standard for empty yards and blown leads so it wasn’t nearly bad enough to qualify for worst loss.

The Jackets gained 655 yards against Tennessee last season (605 in regulation) and lost after leading by two touchdowns in the second half. That Tech meltdown featured special-teams gaffes, a lost fumble and a defensive surrender. Same thing happened at South Florida but at least Paul Johnson’s offense gained lots of yards.

You can make the case that USF’s two kickoff returns for TDs are outliers and that losing the fumble was bad luck. I’ll buy that, if only because I’m admittedly biased in favor of the metrics, which peg the Jackets as a two-touchdown favorite at Pitt.

Tech wins and covers. At least I know I’ll probably feel good about that pick for three quarters.

https://www.ajc.com/blog/mike-check...d-falcons-bounce-back/G6vLYrqY91sArj1mZJIcCJ/
Hope dude's not expecting an invitation to Kaitlyn's wedding.

Also, he should be talking about Pitt in this preview of the match-up, and using that to justify a prediction, rather than re-hashing the previous melt-down at USF which he already documented admirably.
 
Also:

CPJ bristles when he gets opinionated statements from reporters instead of actual questions.

Nearly every time there is controversy about something CPJ said it usually starts with a reporter (frequently KQ) posing an opinionated statement as a question...

/

Why should CPJ be exempt from the same things every other coach puts up with as part of their job?
 
Let's hope the team plays well today and gives Cunningham something more positive to write this week.
 
Let's hope the team plays well today and gives Cunningham something more positive to write this week.

Cunningham coming in HOTT!!

PITTSBURGH —
I was wrong about Georgia Tech football. The Yellow Jackets are not better than expected. They are worse than I could have imagined, and new coordinator Nate Woody’s defense isn’t the only problem.

After all, Tech allowed three points to Pitt after halftime Saturday. The Jackets lost 24-19 because Paul Johnson’s offense couldn’t deliver in crucial moments, early or late. Worse for the Jackets, Johnson doesn’t seem to have confidence that they can run the ball when they want.

That’s a problem when Tech’s offensive identity is built around Johnson’s option. The Jackets have been known to run the ball effectively when its opponents load up to stop it. This Tech team doesn’t even try.

It’s one thing for Tech to be outclassed by ACC-heavyweight Clemson, which comes to Bobby Dodd Stadium on Saturday. It’s another thing to lose to South Florida of the American Athletic Conference and to Pittsburgh, which was steamrolled by Penn State last weekend on this field.

The Jackets trailed Pitt 21-0 before they showed any life. Is their morale low?

“I don’t really know,” quarterback TaQuon Marshall said. “Everybody is going to be down the next couple days. It sucks. That’s another game we should have won, honestly.”

But the Jackets never led, and their final points came with 37 seconds left. That was after they tried to pass the ball on two critical plays that went awry.

The Jackets trailed 21-0 at halftime, but pulled within 24-12 early in the fourth. After a three-and-out by Pitt and a good punt return, Tech had a third-and-6 at Pitt’s 31-yard line.

Johnson called for a pass, which Pitt intercepted at the 1-yard line when receiver Jalen Camp stopped short and Marshall threw long.

“We weren’t on the same page,” Marshall said. “I think that kind of blew the game right there.”

The Jackets passed when they could have taken two cracks at gaining six yards with the run. The way Johnson saw it, the Jackets couldn’t execute a simple pass play.

“I could have hammered that thing in there against nine (in the box), and then you’d want to know why I didn’t throw it,” Johnson said.

I doubt that. If the Jackets couldn’t gain six yards in two plays running the ball, then I’d give them credit for trying to do what they do best. I’ve seen the Jackets try to pass, and it’s usually not pretty.

When the protection doesn’t break down (which happens often) then the passes are inaccurate, or the intended targets drop them. And yet the Jackets keep trying to pass when they could run.

They also did it when trailing Pitt 14-0 in the second quarter. On fourth-and-5 at Pitt’s 23-yard line, Marshall’s pass for Camp sailed high. Pitt, aided by a 60-yard pass on a flea flicker on first down, scored another TD four plays later.

I get why Johnson went for it there on fourth down. Tech’s kicking game is suspect, and it was looking like another long day for the defense. But passing in that situation was another sign that Johnson has little confidence that his offense can do what it’s supposed to do best.

To Johnson, it was another case of the Jackets failing to make a simple pass play.

“I thought it was a ‘gimme’ and it was,” he said. “You’ve got to able to do that when there’s nine guys in the box and it’s one-on-one outside. You’ve got to be able to do that. It’s college football.”

It’s not typical for Tech football, though. If Johnson wants to pass in those situations, then maybe the Jackets need to try different personnel. It’s either that, or figure out how to run the ball even when defenders are aligned to stop it.

We saw the same lack of faith in the running game during Tech’s defeat at South Florida. When the Jackets needed a touchdown to go ahead late, Johnson had Marshall passing behind his leaky line (it did not go well). That was after USF couldn’t stop Marshall’s backup, Tobias Oliver, from running.

Tech has a lot of issues, and Johnson doesn’t seem to have answers for them. When Tech’s defense doesn’t appear overmatched, its offense looks unsure of itself, and that includes the coach.

Maybe that’s why Johnson called a fake punt with Tech trailing Pitt 7-0 and facing fourth-and-7 at its 33-yard line. It wasn’t a shocking decision because Johnson is known to gamble on fourth down. The surprising part was the snap went to Antwan Owens, a defensive end who looked like one while trying to run with the ball.

Pitt dropped Owens for a loss of two yards, then needed only three plays to go 26 yards for another touchdown.

“I’ll eat that one,” Johnson said. “That one is on me.”

If Johnson doesn’t trust the Jackets to run when they want, and they can’t pass when they must, and the defense can’t get off the field when Tech needs the ball ... well, that’s a formula for failure. Tech has lost two games as the favorite. Soon the betting markets will catch up with the reality that the Jackets just aren’t that good.

My optimism about Tech in 2018 was based largely on the assumption that Johnson’s offense would improve because of more experience. There was little sign of that Saturday.

“Right now, for us, it has to be almost perfect,” Johnson said.

Right now the Jackets are passing it when they could run it, and that might be the most troubling sign for them among many.

https://www.ajc.com/blog/mike-check...-crucial-yards-needed/QDjYexdLlv53jbvBNLDHLP/
 
I think he's sure as hell going to try.

I wonder how many games since Butker left that we'd win if we had Butker.
I wonder if Matthew Jordan had not been injured last year and had won the job in the spring would we have had a better record in 2017, or if Lucas Johnson not been injured would we have a viable passing threat this season.
 
I wonder if Matthew Jordan had not been injured last year and had won the job in the spring would we have had a better record in 2017, or if Lucas Johnson not been injured would we have a viable passing threat this season.

My guess to that is 'yes'; but that all goes back on CPJ. As I said in another thread, we should have a Tevin Washington type qb as a minimum at this point. And we should also have a big B-back who can pound the ball. I agree with Cunningham that CPJ doesn't seem confident in the offense, and why should he, the current personnel can only run about 40% of it well; and when that is the case it isn't that hard to defend against.
 
Cunningham coming in HOTT!!

PITTSBURGH —
I was wrong about Georgia Tech football. The Yellow Jackets are not better than expected. They are worse than I could have imagined, and new coordinator Nate Woody’s defense isn’t the only problem.

After all, Tech allowed three points to Pitt after halftime Saturday. The Jackets lost 24-19 because Paul Johnson’s offense couldn’t deliver in crucial moments, early or late. Worse for the Jackets, Johnson doesn’t seem to have confidence that they can run the ball when they want.

That’s a problem when Tech’s offensive identity is built around Johnson’s option. The Jackets have been known to run the ball effectively when its opponents load up to stop it. This Tech team doesn’t even try.

It’s one thing for Tech to be outclassed by ACC-heavyweight Clemson, which comes to Bobby Dodd Stadium on Saturday. It’s another thing to lose to South Florida of the American Athletic Conference and to Pittsburgh, which was steamrolled by Penn State last weekend on this field.

The Jackets trailed Pitt 21-0 before they showed any life. Is their morale low?

“I don’t really know,” quarterback TaQuon Marshall said. “Everybody is going to be down the next couple days. It sucks. That’s another game we should have won, honestly.”

But the Jackets never led, and their final points came with 37 seconds left. That was after they tried to pass the ball on two critical plays that went awry.

The Jackets trailed 21-0 at halftime, but pulled within 24-12 early in the fourth. After a three-and-out by Pitt and a good punt return, Tech had a third-and-6 at Pitt’s 31-yard line.

Johnson called for a pass, which Pitt intercepted at the 1-yard line when receiver Jalen Camp stopped short and Marshall threw long.

“We weren’t on the same page,” Marshall said. “I think that kind of blew the game right there.”

The Jackets passed when they could have taken two cracks at gaining six yards with the run. The way Johnson saw it, the Jackets couldn’t execute a simple pass play.

“I could have hammered that thing in there against nine (in the box), and then you’d want to know why I didn’t throw it,” Johnson said.

I doubt that. If the Jackets couldn’t gain six yards in two plays running the ball, then I’d give them credit for trying to do what they do best. I’ve seen the Jackets try to pass, and it’s usually not pretty.

When the protection doesn’t break down (which happens often) then the passes are inaccurate, or the intended targets drop them. And yet the Jackets keep trying to pass when they could run.

They also did it when trailing Pitt 14-0 in the second quarter. On fourth-and-5 at Pitt’s 23-yard line, Marshall’s pass for Camp sailed high. Pitt, aided by a 60-yard pass on a flea flicker on first down, scored another TD four plays later.

I get why Johnson went for it there on fourth down. Tech’s kicking game is suspect, and it was looking like another long day for the defense. But passing in that situation was another sign that Johnson has little confidence that his offense can do what it’s supposed to do best.

To Johnson, it was another case of the Jackets failing to make a simple pass play.

“I thought it was a ‘gimme’ and it was,” he said. “You’ve got to able to do that when there’s nine guys in the box and it’s one-on-one outside. You’ve got to be able to do that. It’s college football.”

It’s not typical for Tech football, though. If Johnson wants to pass in those situations, then maybe the Jackets need to try different personnel. It’s either that, or figure out how to run the ball even when defenders are aligned to stop it.

We saw the same lack of faith in the running game during Tech’s defeat at South Florida. When the Jackets needed a touchdown to go ahead late, Johnson had Marshall passing behind his leaky line (it did not go well). That was after USF couldn’t stop Marshall’s backup, Tobias Oliver, from running.

Tech has a lot of issues, and Johnson doesn’t seem to have answers for them. When Tech’s defense doesn’t appear overmatched, its offense looks unsure of itself, and that includes the coach.

Maybe that’s why Johnson called a fake punt with Tech trailing Pitt 7-0 and facing fourth-and-7 at its 33-yard line. It wasn’t a shocking decision because Johnson is known to gamble on fourth down. The surprising part was the snap went to Antwan Owens, a defensive end who looked like one while trying to run with the ball.

Pitt dropped Owens for a loss of two yards, then needed only three plays to go 26 yards for another touchdown.

“I’ll eat that one,” Johnson said. “That one is on me.”

If Johnson doesn’t trust the Jackets to run when they want, and they can’t pass when they must, and the defense can’t get off the field when Tech needs the ball ... well, that’s a formula for failure. Tech has lost two games as the favorite. Soon the betting markets will catch up with the reality that the Jackets just aren’t that good.

My optimism about Tech in 2018 was based largely on the assumption that Johnson’s offense would improve because of more experience. There was little sign of that Saturday.

“Right now, for us, it has to be almost perfect,” Johnson said.

Right now the Jackets are passing it when they could run it, and that might be the most troubling sign for them among many.

https://www.ajc.com/blog/mike-check...-crucial-yards-needed/QDjYexdLlv53jbvBNLDHLP/
Cunningham's a pretty good read, but I don't think CPJ has lost faith in his running offense. I think Cunningham misunderstands that CPJ's offense is not just run-it-whenever-you-want, but rather an option offense, which depends on selecting favorable match ups for success. So you've got to be able to pass it when you have an open guy for first down, and you have to be able to run it when they get scared and drop into coverage, etc. It's not a matter of running or passing whenever you want, but of doing whatever the defense gives you.

I don't think the problem was play calling, but execution. If TQM can't hit open receivers, or receivers can't catch balls thrown to them, we're gonna suck. And obviously it's on CPJ to recruit/coach up QB's and WR's to do that. Maybe he should be spending more time practicing those plays, even though they're gimme's.
 
Cunningham's a pretty good read, but I don't think CPJ has lost faith in his running offense. I think Cunningham misunderstands that CPJ's offense is not just run-it-whenever-you-want, but rather an option offense, which depends on selecting favorable match ups for success. So you've got to be able to pass it when you have an open guy for first down, and you have to be able to run it when they get scared and drop into coverage, etc. It's not a matter of running or passing whenever you want, but of doing whatever the defense gives you.

I don't think the problem was play calling, but execution. If TQM can't hit open receivers, or receivers can't catch balls thrown to them, we're gonna suck. And obviously it's on CPJ to recruit/coach up QB's and WR's to do that. Maybe he should be spending more time practicing those plays, even though they're gimme's.

I would bet trying to teach Marshall to make option reads eats up practice time and the passing is suffering because of it.
 
I would bet trying to teach Marshall to make option reads eats up practice time and the passing is suffering because of it.
Absolutely. We've never had a QB that could be relied on to make the gimme throws. Some QB/WR combos have been better than others (JFN/DT, and JT5/Smelter come to mind), but passing has always been an adventure. An obviously practice time is a big part of that.
 
Cunningham could absolutely trigger CPJ during the weekly presser, if Cunningham decides to ask some tough questions. Time for reporters to stop lobbing softballs
 
Absolutely. We've never had a QB that could be relied on to make the gimme throws. Some QB/WR combos have been better than others (JFN/DT, and JT5/Smelter come to mind), but passing has always been an adventure. An obviously practice time is a big part of that.

CPJ indicated as much yesterday in the post-game presser, complaining of our inability to make 'gimme' throws when 'they have 9 in the box and man coverage outside'.

Tough to get mad at a guy who is a converted RB though. TQ is doing the best he can. I feel for the kid - he's just not a QB.
 
CPJ indicated as much yesterday in the post-game presser, complaining of our inability to make 'gimme' throws when 'they have 9 in the box and man coverage outside'.

Tough to get mad at a guy who is a converted RB though. TQ is doing the best he can. I feel for the kid - he's just not a QB.

If CPJ weren’t so stubborn he could put in a shotgun snap and help his QB make the “gimme” throws.
 
If CPJ weren’t so stubborn he could put in a shotgun snap and help his QB make the “gimme” throws.

you know my feelings on that subject. not sure why CPJ seems determined at times to make completing passes as difficult as possible.
 
If CPJ weren’t so stubborn he could put in a shotgun snap and help his QB make the “gimme” throws.
Well, that certainly would make it a little clearer to everyone what we were going to do. And of course a different snap mechanism would require a lot of practice to not screw up. How many times a season do we see centers sky the ball over the QB's head? On badly coached teams, it seems to happen with some frequency.
 
Back
Top