texstinger
Dodd-Like
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2002
- Messages
- 8,816
The other thing to think about- Would Jeff be able to recruit as good as Paul?
Dear God!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The other thing to think about- Would Jeff be able to recruit as good as Paul?
I have no problem with Monken if he is personal and gets marketing a bit, can recruit, wants to recruit and has proven he will recruit. And if he has friends who want to recruit, I'd be fine with him. He seems like a very good coach.
In the words of George Carlin... "Think about how dumb the average guy is. Then think about the fact that half the people are dumber than him."Y'all are unbelievably naive if you think that Tech's STEM curriculum doesn't weed out a huge percentage of potential recruits, some because Tech won't let them in but a lot more because they don't want to do the work. I teach HS pre-engineering courses and I just had one of my 4 year pre-engineering students who was recruited by Tech (no offer - he's not really a D1 athlete) tell me last year that he didn't want to go to GT because it would be too hard for him. He could handle it if he wanted to, but he didn't have that drive. OTOH, many of my non-engineering, non-honors students have to use a calculator to do things like double digit addition or subtraction. They don't know how to solve for X, they don't know what the pythagorean theorem is, most understand percentages but will struggle to calculate them, and some can't even calculate the average of a set of data points. It's not just my school - we're above average for the state. Y'all really think that is Georgia Tech material? Because that is the average D1 football recruit.
There's so much academic support for GT athletes (in the words of Adam Gotsis: "You really have to try to fail") that this is only a perception thing. Not that 'perception things' aren't important, they are.
Right. IMO there are two ways to improve recruiting without making widespread curricular changes:But perception becomes reality. As @johncu noted earlier in the thread, a lot of those kids don't have the drive. Most of the athletes (there are a few exceptions) are much worse students than the average student coming into GT. I think that some of the fonts don't understand how shallow the pool is for GT recruiting in this state.
Whomever the new coach is really needs to have better support from TStan in the way of resources ($$$) to cast a wider net on the national level.
*WhoeverBut perception becomes reality. As @johncu noted earlier in the thread, a lot of those kids don't have the drive. Most of the athletes (there are a few exceptions) are much worse students than the average student coming into GT. I think that some of the fonts don't understand how shallow the pool is for GT recruiting in this state.
Whomever the new coach is really needs to have better support from TStan in the way of resources ($$$) to cast a wider net on the national level.
Group projects probably explain the ibeeballin / jacketforlife feud.My experience with Tech athletes during the Gailey years, including several future NFL players, was that not one of them was an idiot. In fact, they were all engaged in their school work for the most part and worked like the rest of us to get a grade. I also found football players to be better in group projects than just regular students - they got their stuff done and did not leave other group members holding the bag on an unfinished task.
I'm sure you're right, but that does not reflect the typical D1 football player. Do you think students at UGA would say the same about athletes in their classes?My experience with Tech athletes during the Gailey years, including several future NFL players, was that not one of them was an idiot. In fact, they were all engaged in their school work for the most part and worked like the rest of us to get a grade. I also found football players to be better in group projects than just regular students - they got their stuff done and did not leave other group members holding the bag on an unfinished task.
No, because I met Leonard Pope one time in Athens.I'm sure you're right, but that does not reflect the typical D1 football player. Do you think students at UGA would say the same about athletes in their classes?
There absolutely are. There are enough 4 and 5 star athletes out there willing and able to do the work at GT that we could win a national championship. We're just fighting massively against the odds trying to find them and sign them.No, because I met Leonard Pope one time in Athens.
My bigger point is that there are nfl caliber athletes out there who are capable of doing the work at Tech. It’s defeatist to think otherwise.
I'm sure you're right, but that does not reflect the typical D1 football player. Do you think students at UGA would say the same about athletes in their classes?
In the words of George Carlin... "Think about how dumb the average guy is. Then think about the fact that half the people are dumber than him."
There's so much academic support for GT athletes (in the words of Adam Gotsis: "You really have to try to fail") that this is only a perception thing. Not that 'perception things' aren't important, they are.
exactly. I mean, Gotsis didn't even speak english and he graduated.In the words of George Carlin... "Think about how dumb the average guy is. Then think about the fact that half the people are dumber than him."
There's so much academic support for GT athletes (in the words of Adam Gotsis: "You really have to try to fail") that this is only a perception thing. Not that 'perception things' aren't important, they are.