Official NYD Bowl Thread

JJacket said:
I think he lifted his heel to establish inbounds
Click to expand...
I assume the whole foot that was out has to be off the ground before you can reestablish. Similar to how if your toes come down in bounds first it's not a catch if your heel then comes down out of bounds.
 
andrew said:
I assume the whole foot that was out has to be off the ground before you can reestablish. Similar to how if your toes come down in bounds first it's not a catch if your heel then comes down out of bounds.
Click to expand...

That’s not true, as lots of TDs have been called with only toes dragging the ground before the guy touches out of bounds.
 
The B1G is a joke. They would not be one of the “top” conference without constant ESPN propaganda
 
Don’t have a preference but would be sweet to hear the gaggers cry they should have been there if Michigan could thump Bama.
 
Surprised at Michigan’s team speed … usually Big Ten can’t match SEC speed but Michigan looks fast.
 
verdi said:
The B1G is a joke. They would not be one of the “top” conference without constant ESPN propaganda
Click to expand...
They make a great foil for their product especially with all the contractually obligated bowl matchups.
 
Alabama runs the ball for a TD. Obviously, throwing the ball is the plan now.
 
coit said:
That’s not true, as lots of TDs have been called with only toes dragging the ground before the guy touches out of bounds.
Click to expand...

I don't think so. Definitely if the toe touches first, then comes off the ground, then he hits the ground -- touchdown. Or if the toe touches inbounds, no other part of that foot touches out of bounds, and then another part of his body touches out -- touchdown.

But not if the toe touches first and then the heel comes down out without that foot leaving the ground first. If that happens, it's considered being out of bounds even though the front part of the foot hit inbounds first.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top